The chances of a student who cannot afford textbooks, housing, or food to somehow end up with a GPA, MCAT score, and ECs required by top schools (as presented by MSAR), must be pretty close to zero.
Think about it, a starving person who ill with hunger pains, not sleeping enough, working a full time job which doesn't cover tuition costs, who is often homeless, coming up with make-shift ways to learn without proper materials....
I wonder:
1. How many people reap the benefits from those programs you described at those "top schools"? It's easy for an institution to offer money if they never have to pay it out! If it's impossible for a student with a qualifying background to get there, top schools won't have to pay a dime.
2. I wonder if there ARE people benefiting from the top school financial programs (you mentioned), but not anyone as bad off as the people I described? There will always be people who can strategically make themselves qualify on paper even if, in reality, they shouldn't qualify (i.e. put your money in grandma's name so fafsa doesn't catch it; decrease taxable income the year before applying to school, etc.).
3. This question might not be easily answered, but OUT OF ALL the people in the world (including those here in the USA) who meet my description of not affording food, housing, or textbooks, what sort of IQ, skill, etc... What would it take for them get into a top school? What's the threshold of intelligence, etc. required by them versus a middle class student?