My WWittle Pony: Friendship is MMagic Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Didnt you literally said that at some point you peeked the thread and you thought that people were giving you room to breath for your vacation or somthing and were cool with it?
Yes... so... you see how this translates to "if you vote for her, she will not appear on thread and it is not effective pressure"?
 
Alternatively, MJ. Because at least historically, he rarely does a significant amount of playing and ends up being a frustrating liability when he inevitably survives into later game. You end up having to decide whether you want to risk losing to a close-to-silent wolf or want to kill a cycle getting rid of him, which isn't fun.

(I accept my hypocrisy in posting this after being 100% MIA the first day).
Noted
 
Yes... so... you see how this translates to "if you vote for her, she will not appear on thread and it is not effective pressure"?
The post about you peeking and being easy about it cuz you thought you werent receiving pressure doesnt give me the vibes or 'She will not appear in thread if we vote for her'

Cuz like, if you didnt cared, you wouldnt had peeked the thread. Or at least would be concious of you recieving somewhat of a pressure and saying you didnt care or smth .
 
I will read some MJ meta as time allows. Do you have a particular game to rec, since you are an encyclopedia of SDN WW games? Otherwise it may just be something that I forgo for this game, reasoning that he clearly hasn't been around for at least several months and may be in a different frame of mind than in his past games. I remember hearing about the crazy things he'd pull to avoid getting yeeted, mostly, and the current thread presence doesn't feel very chaotic or dedicated to scum survival.
The 2019 Supernatural features wolf!MJ, but I'm not sure if that's his most recent.

Regardless, I don't see why he'd be pulling crazy things to not be yeeted when he has no votes.
 
Still have this read on Zenge? Can I ask what you're basing it on? I generally have issues reading Zenge, if like every game I've ever villaged wit him is any indication (RIP England, last game)
Wait I thought you said last game that you're good at reading Zenge

Or was that Truey
 
LockW?

Afe?

What is even happening here between you and PSV?
This is weird because I skimmed past that exchange as a joke and now I feel like I either 1. Missed something or 2. You latched a little curiously to a joke
 
Took a quick peek and I was like "no one is pressuring me, almost everyone is forgiving of my in-law vacation hostage situation"

Nope cause voting me wouldn't have gotten me on thread. It would have been sand in the ocean of a tide of life going on. Nothing short of this particular point of day and getting the time to be online was ever going to get me over onto the game thread.

My trouble is that I dont think your approach adds up? Maybe its nitpicky but I get two different vibes from this posts.

In one when you checked the thread you kept in mind if someone was pressuring you, and felt easy because you werent getting pressure.

In the other one you say like, getting pressure wouldnt change a thing for you.

If the second one is true, its like... Weird? To have that in mind when you are peeking the thread tbh
 
Need to come back to thread hut normally I find you a more.opinionated player, quick to be a teacher rather than a student, and I want to iso how common it is for you to ask others to help you read someone rather than explain to noobs what you think of their mannerisms or post style
This view has really solidified. I'm not used to reading this kind of tone or play from Cray and if anything, reading her earlier content hasn't helped.
 
Ah yes, I do find appeals to typos or grammar rather wolfy. Wolf points to PSV.

Who here claims to be able to read PSV? I have them in a category with TN and some other noobs where I often find them wolfy when the village blocc is reading them village. Anyone want to give some insight into PSV meta?
I can usually read PSV. Also I was lightly joking about the typos before I realized it sounded assholey-ish so I stopped.
This feels very premature. Do you have powers of reading those two I don't know about, like to live dangerously, or happen to know something I don't?
I guess the middle? I tend to default village read Dubz and Zenge and I'm sure someday it will bite me in the zonge.
But why does that make them both village? Couldn't they be wolfy friends? Or like w/v? Wolves need friends too, man.

I don't really want a repeat of last game when it comes to them this game tho.
Friends *to me*. As in, won't gobble gobble on villagers.
How did you know that game?
AM already answered but that whole game and theme was my brainchild. I birthed her.
Also, PSV is not an easy misyeet. She's only been misyeeted once.
This is inaccurate. I was misyeeted in Stardew as well.
I'd call myself more a common sus target than an easy misyeet, and TN calling me an easy misyeet last game was one of the wolf pings that I foolishly ignored.
 
Didn't one of the wolves jump on that vote though and it helped us find them? Wasn't it visc?

Not saying we should do a repeat, but I do think it's good to mix things up and do different things and see what happens.
...but yeeting a consensus village person just to try and catch a wolf?? Feels like a waste of a cycle.
Coming back to this real quick before I forget, but still reading thread, I remembered what else seemed not-wolfy about MJ:

I've only seem him play as a scum faction, not a villager, but he was SUPER aggressive and taunting. The kind of play I bristle at and for a hot minute earlier in this game's pages, thought Santy was going to pull out on PSV & Cray before I saw that Santy just has a very engaged sense of humor and that he wasn't actually going to be a bit of a bully. So the lack of aggression in MJ's posts is standing out to me.
He also hasn't really been here to come off as any way, tbh. He just petted Dubz and ghosted.
 
Multiball exactly counts you weaklings. Scum is scum is scum, and it can be found. Even if said scum kills wolves. Intent to deceive and all that jazz.
One post of normal Cray.
Ah yes, I do find appeals to typos or grammar rather wolfy. Wolf points to PSV.

Who here claims to be able to read PSV? I have them in a category with TN and some other noobs where I often find them wolfy when the village blocc is reading them village. Anyone want to give some insight into PSV meta?

This feels very premature. Do you have powers of reading those two I don't know about, like to live dangerously, or happen to know something I don't?

@Crayola227 Can you explain why you directly questioned PSV's play right after you asked for help with a meta read? You seem to have made up your own mind and coasted right on by.
 
My trouble is that I dont think your approach adds up? Maybe its nitpicky but I get two different vibes from this posts.

In one when you checked the thread you kept in mind if someone was pressuring you, and felt easy because you werent getting pressure.

In the other one you say like, getting pressure wouldnt change a thing for you.

If the second one is true, its like... Weird? To have that in mind when you are peeking the thread tbh
Maybe you just think you understand my thought process when you don't.

You have me very involved in the game. "Oh let's see who's voting me. All clear? Okay. Good. I'll come back later."
It's more like "skim quickly, back to fam. Click notifications, if it's a note from someone who isn't going to need follow up asap respond, go back to not being on thread." You are insistent, right now, on seeing a contradiction of intent where there absolutely is not one. Also a very weird misunderstanding for you to be digging your teeth into and shaking around.
 
I'm not sure I follow your point in this instance.
I'm pointing out that maybe we shouldn't act like voting certain players early game is some kind of crime or something, because as I've said before it can 1) prevent them from being an early NK if there is a lil sus 2) give opportunities for wolves to act opportunistic and 3) it can punish players voting there that aren't acting as opportunistic wolves for just doing their thing and playing. It can be discouraging overall. And this is assuming the person being voted is even village, which, whatever happened last game is irrelevant to Aff this game.

Also besides the fact alissa didn't play that game, not only is she not responsible for changing her play this game to suit that, even if she had, she still wouldn't be under obligation.
 
I'm pointing out that maybe we shouldn't act like voting certain players early game is some kind of crime or something, because as I've said before it can 1) prevent them from being an early NK if there is a lil sus 2) give opportunities for wolves to act opportunistic and 3) it can punish players voting there that aren't acting as opportunistic wolves for just doing their thing and playing. It can be discouraging overall. And this is assuming the person being voted is even village, which, whatever happened last game is irrelevant to Aff this game.

Also besides the fact alissa didn't play that game, not only is she not responsible for changing her play this game to suit that, even if she had, she still wouldn't be under obligation.
Noting that you changed your tone to a more familiar, pedagogical tone after I called out your tone shift. But that you didn't address any of my remarks on it or try to directly engage me.
 
Maybe you just think you understand my thought process when you don't.

You have me very involved in the game. "Oh let's see who's voting me. All clear? Okay. Good. I'll come back later."
It's more like "skim quickly, back to fam. Click notifications, if it's a note from someone who isn't going to need follow up asap respond, go back to not being on thread." You are insistent, right now, on seeing a contradiction of intent where there absolutely is not one. Also a very weird misunderstanding for you to be digging your teeth into and shaking around.
Yeah, I see the bolded line of thought from you. But if things werent 'clear' when you checked, I dont think you would be like 'I'll come back later anyways' and said something.

So you later being like 'Putting pressure on me while Im not in thread is bad' doesnt seem very.. real? Or maybe a little delusional or idk how to describe it well.

Do you think Im wolfy for questioning you about this? Why?
 
Yeah, I see the bolded line of thought from you. But if things werent 'clear' when you checked, I dont think you would be like 'I'll come back later anyways' and said something.

So you later being like 'Putting pressure on me while Im not in thread is bad' doesnt seem very.. real? Or maybe a little delusional or idk how to describe it well.

Do you think Im wolfy for questioning you about this? Why?
When did I say that. Quote it. Go.
 
Yeah, I see the bolded line of thought from you. But if things werent 'clear' when you checked, I dont think you would be like 'I'll come back later anyways' and said something.

So you later being like 'Putting pressure on me while Im not in thread is bad' doesnt seem very.. real? Or maybe a little delusional or idk how to describe it well.

Do you think Im wolfy for questioning you about this? Why?
Pull this alleged quote. Now.
 
Maybe you just think you understand my thought process when you don't.

You have me very involved in the game. "Oh let's see who's voting me. All clear? Okay. Good. I'll come back later."
It's more like "skim quickly, back to fam. Click notifications, if it's a note from someone who isn't going to need follow up asap respond, go back to not being on thread." You are insistent, right now, on seeing a contradiction of intent where there absolutely is not one. Also a very weird misunderstanding for you to be digging your teeth into and shaking around.
I am specifically asking cause what Im bolding here implies that imo
 
@Santygrass Until you have something more concrete to tell me, I am entirely disengaging from your hyperfixation on my use of my personal time. You are welcome to scream at a wall all you want. Bring up something new. You're wrong and you're welcome to continue to be as wrong as it pleases you to be.
 
Pull this alleged quote. Now.
Its the whole reason this interaction started cuz you reacted with 'angry' to a post in where I said that making you a wagon for a wake up call was also a good idea.
 
Its the whole reason this interaction started cuz you reacted with 'angry' to a post in where I said that making you a wagon for a wake up call was also a good idea.
You are taking emojis way too seriously. It is not uncommon on this forum for people to angry or sad react votes on them. I also directly engaged that post (at this point, to where it is distracting from wolf hunting). Do you have anything else?
 
I am trying to see where your mindset comes from, maybe you see it as 'fixiation' but I think it is somewhat needed cause you are a lynch candidate for today.

Tho if you see other things that are more worth doing you arent obliged to talk with me ig /?
 
BoilingForsakenConch-size_restricted.gif
 
Nope cause voting me wouldn't have gotten me on thread. It would have been sand in the ocean of a tide of life going on. Nothing short of this particular point of day and getting the time to be online was ever going to get me over onto the game thread.
You are taking emojis way too seriously. It is not uncommon on this forum for people to angry or sad react votes on them. I also directly engaged that post (at this point, to where it is distracting from wolf hunting). Do you have anything else?

Tbh this was the answer I was expecting when I questioned you but still did it in case I got something different. I dont think that a reaction on a post holds much wheight LOL.

Then I was weirded by the reply of you standing by that reaction and saying that stuff that was in the vibe of 'Voting there was useless cuz nothing would make me get into thread' , when you previously had said that at a time you peeked thread and checked if you were getting pressure.
Do you think that me engaging with you and trying to figure out your alignment hurts wolfhunting? Like you are being voted by someone else too, so me finding you as town would be highly positive for wolfhunting imo. And you are free to do your own wolfhunting and bounce off reads with me too
 
Tbh this was the answer I was expecting when I questioned you but still did it in case I got something different. I dont think that a reaction on a post holds much wheight LOL.

Then I was weirded by the reply of you standing by that reaction and saying that stuff that was in the vibe of 'Voting there was useless cuz nothing would make me get into thread' , when you previously had said that at a time you peeked thread and checked if you were getting pressure.
Do you think that me engaging with you and trying to figure out your alignment hurts wolfhunting? Like you are being voted by someone else too, so me finding you as town would be highly positive for wolfhunting imo. And you are free to do your own wolfhunting and bounce off reads with me too
You're still not pulling this quote because it doesn't exist and you don't want to admit that you are wantonly misinterpreting my words? Okay. Also you're changing it from me allegedly saying pressure is bad to just checking for pressure? Okay.
 
Top