•••quote:•••Originally posted by RT:
• •••quote:•••Originally posted by Tweetie_bird:
• •••quote:•••Originally posted by RT:
•Post-2ndary: Publications
What would you do if your citation for publications is more than the space allowed (510 chars). Mine is ~1290 chars. I'm a bit unwilling to disregard any one of those pubs, including the ones that are in preparation.
I've already put them in the format that's usually appeared in C.V.
RT•••••I am having the same issue. I think it might be best if we put down our hypotheses/observations of the paper. I don't think it should take that much space. Plus, if you leave them a bit in the dark (eg: just tell them hypotheses) it might be a good interview topic. 🙂 Any other suggestions? 🙄 •••••I've decided to split my pubs into two entries, though I'm still seeking for advice. I have "primary author" and another "non-primary author" entries. It's only because I need more space than allowed for all of the pubs citation. I'm not sure whether this's a good idea????•••••RT,
I don't get what you're saying. How many pubs do you have total? I have 4 and one conference, and I think i will keep it as five different experiences. i have about a line or two, along with the citation in each desc. section which seems to work perfectly for me.
I have a ? -- what are you doing for pubs that are only submitted or are accepted, but not yet in print?? do you say "submitted" or "accepted" ?? so far, I only have one in print. Rest all are either submitted or accepted to come out end of this year.
What do you think?
Tweetie