Quantcast

please help to rank these programs

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dretrowemma

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have hard time to rank among these four programs: U. Iowa, U. Florida, John hopkins Bayview and U. cincinnati? Could you guys provide some insights? I hope to have the opportunity to do hem/onc fellowship in a good place later. And which one provide better residency training? Thanks.
 

Da Vinci2

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2003
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Iowa is the best out of the bunch, rep wise. Location is another issue though.
 

Kalel

Membership Revoked
Removed
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
792
Reaction score
3
I agree, Iowa is probably the best training/prestige-wise. U Florida seems to do well in fellowship placement though, as does Hopkins Bayview (many from there seem to end up in prestigious hostpitals). My main problem with Bayview is that it's such a small program and hospital, and I think that they are kind of looked upon as a second-rate Hopkins program (although the residents there told me that they aren't treated any differently then the main Hopkins program). I don't know very much about U Cinncinati other then I've heard that they have a prestigous peds program. Just remember to go with your gut instinct when ranking programs, you should go wherever you think that you will be most happy. Any one of those program will allow you to get into a decent heme onc fellowship.
 

dretrowemma

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Thanks, kalel and Da Vinci2. I agree with you about bayview. Though they seem to do well for fellowship placement, but many feel they are second rate of hopkins. I like U iowa, but the town is not very appealing. Many seniors members also told me to go with my gut feeling, guess that is what I have to do. Hope you all do well matching.
 
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
Top