This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Ive been told by various clinicians they think AI will negatively impact me, doesn't help reading stuff like this. I could always switch to IM during prelim and do cards/GI. I like radiology and would love to be a radiologist RIGHT NOW, but dang the future has me worried
Eh my department is pretty pro-AI. We have had quite a few grand rounds from big places that are leading the AI research and from using the tools daily, I don’t see anything happening soon. I definitely would not listen to the pre med who keeps posting stuff out of their knowledge base. I see a lot of areas where AI can help us with work list integration, helping us do the awful cancer follow ups, and characterizing things that our eyes are not the best at seeing. Look at the fda cleared algorithms on ACR, I don’t think any of the current known algorithms are trying to replace radiologists.

Can it lower our reimbursements and job market in the future? Sure. No one knows. Keep in mind, midlevels are a bigger threat to physicians than AI at the moment. For many fields, AI+ midlevels will likely be a huge threat, especially for your example of general cardiology. As for GI, as a prelim I was allowed to do colonoscopies and endoscopies almost solo and surgeons can do them too so… I’m sure people can be trained to do them.

If you truly believe the AI hype and are scared, do something surgical. Running to IM and fellowship won’t do that much for you.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
reach out to as many experts as you can. reach out on twitter, linkedin etc.

try to get a well rounded, informed opinion from those with a real pulse on current state of affairs and where things are likely headed.

i can only answer for myself -- no, i would not choose radiology if i was a med student. that is how i feel. others obviously disagree. to each their own. but imo spending 6 years training for something when already in heaps of debt is just too big of a risk for me to stomach.
What would you recommend then?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I don't need to prove that I understand Fourier Transform ( or how I applied it ) to some anonymous person. But I am really appalled that there is no moderation in this forums for personal insults. If the moderator read most of my messages, it is about facts that I even asked to cross check with experts, apologetic when I was wrong and acknowledged when there was valid point in counter argument. I think we need Doctors who care for society and patients than being insecure and fight hard to stay relevant. People could always retrain if they have open mind.
The issue is that you don’t actually have a clue what a radiologist does and how complex it is. I can show you three different MSK radiologists and they would have 3 different levels of sensitivity for calling, say, rotator cuff tendinosis vs tear, and they would each have different ideas of what makes the impression to help guide clinician decision making. There are so many variables, and having someone on the other end to talk to a clinician about what their findings mean/don’t mean and having that radiologist give his or her opinion is invaluable. The whole process is much more complex than you realize, and people seem to think it’s just look at pictures -> spit out findings, but it’s far more difficult than that and AI is unlikely to be able to recreate/replace/significantly reduce load for a very long time if physicians have to go back and read the AI prelim reports anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The issue is that you don’t actually have a clue what a radiologist does and how complex it is. I can show you three different MSK radiologists and they would have 3 different levels of sensitivity for calling, say, rotator cuff tendinosis vs tear, and they would each have different ideas of what makes the impression to help guide clinician decision making. There are so many variables, and having someone on the other end to talk to a clinician about what their findings mean/don’t mean and having that radiologist give his or her opinion is invaluable. The whole process is much more complex than you realize, and people seem to think it’s just look at pictures -> spit out findings, but it’s far more difficult than that and AI is unlikely to be able to recreate/replace/significantly reduce load for a very long time if physicians have to go back and read the AI prelim reports anyways.
Again people wanted to write something before understanding what is written. Please read all my posts again. There are more things I mentioned about AI growth, Silicon technology etc., than threat to Radiology itself. But thanks for your explanation.
 
Last edited:
Become a plumber, AI can’t do that. And no, I don’t mean a vascular surgeon.
That is the paradox of AI to currently how society function. As cost of intelligence goes low, the manual labor like Plumber, Construction worker and Gardener could be in demand than General Physician, Lawyer and Programmer. As of now, Humanoid robots are expensive or even not possible to built to be a plumber or gardener than building some machine going through volumes of medical journal/clinical reports and giving diagnostic suggestion.
 
Again people wanted to write something before understanding what is written. Please read all my posts again. There are more things I mentioned about AI growth, Silicon technology etc., than threat to Radiology itself.
Bro. I’m not going back to read all of your posts again. It’s fine. I’m just explaining why radiology residents and physicians will mostly roll their eyes at you.
 
Bro. I’m not going back to read all of your posts again. It’s fine. I’m just explaining why radiology residents and physicians will mostly roll their eyes at you.

Maybe just best to let him spin his wheels.

I guess the AI zealotry does serve to decrease the competition for those people who truly love radiology, weeding out the other specialists who in ten years will look back at the opportunity with lament, and try to convince everyone else then how they made the right decision by not going into a field that looks better than the one they picked out of fear. Because AI is “just around the corner,” or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Maybe just best to let him spin his wheels.

I guess the AI zealotry does serve to decrease the competition for those people who truly love radiology, weeding out the other specialists who in ten years will look back at the opportunity with lament, and try to convince everyone else then how they made the right decision by not going into a field that looks better than the one they picked out of fear. Because AI is “just around the corner,” or something.
Isn’t there an IM guy who lurks here and does this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You pale pixel lovers rang? Don't make me post a link to another TED talk . . .
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Top