• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Scientifically Silly WW Game Thread

Started by WildZoo
Veterinary Science Graduate Programs from U. of I.
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
PippyPony said:
When nerds try to make the things they do sound sexy

I'm so sad @Crayola227 isn't around for this lol
Click to expand...
It doesnt work in the field of pathology

I want you smeared on a slide

...but I'll need to poke you with a needle first

Come into the gross room so I can examine your Netherlands

...because you really should have that mass biopsied
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Lynch Bryn

For her comments about Coffee?'s votes. She was being overly alarmist without cause, and I don't think her logic there was super village.
 
Animal Midwife said:
Why do you ask?
Click to expand...
Variety of reasons

1. The last game I played with him he had a lot of drunkish-sounding posts until later in the game and curious if that's what he is maintaining here

2. If it'll be his fallback for today

3. Concern for his health (3pm is pretty late for a hangover. I get through mine on ice chips and toast but coffee helps ☕)
 
bryndiana.jones said:
What part about me not wanting a quick bandwagon resulting in lynch closing due to plurity is wolfy?
Click to expand...
PippyPony said:
How so?
Click to expand...

It was specifically the "if both wolves and one more villager jump on she's toast!" comment.

I get being careful with votes in a plurality game, but that was over the top. It didn't feel like legitimate village reasoning, especially the fear that the wolves would see someone with 2 votes on board and say 'Hey, let's lynch them in as sketchy a way as possible on D1!' To me it read like Bryn was adding irrelevant discussion for the sake of adding discussion.
 
Day 1 Please Refrain From Unzipping Your Genes Lynch Tally

coffee? (2) - skil, AM
AM (1) - pip
Skil (1) - SAR
Bj (1) - peebs

@CoffeeQuestionMark you are winning!
Plurality = 5 votes
5/9 voting

Not voting: bj, coffee?, cheezit, dolphin

Deadline: 10pm EST (~6 hours)

kitteh-in-bread-jpg.238807
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
PrincessButterCup said:
It was specifically the "if both wolves and one more villager jump on she's toast!" comment.

I get being careful with votes in a plurality game, but that was over the top. It didn't feel like legitimate village reasoning, especially the fear that the wolves would see someone with 2 votes on board and say 'Hey, let's lynch them in as sketchy a way as possible on D1!' To me it read like Bryn was adding irrelevant discussion for the sake of adding discussion.
Click to expand...
"irrelevant" is subjective, but I certainly don't think it was irrelevant, or I wouldn't have said anything.
 
Animal Midwife said:
What about her is pinging you?
Click to expand...
Kind of what PBC just summed up lol. But just she was seeming overly concerned with the votes and then giving a wolf scenario that they probably wouldn’t do. The best way I can describe it is trying too hard to be adding to the discussion. But I thought I was just going a little insane, so I don’t know if I like PBC agreeing with my brain or find it not good.
 
Plus last game she was pinging my feels a lot and I was so wrong. So I’m not feeling very good about my ability to analyze and read her.
 
PrincessButterCup said:
So you stand by that scenario being highly likely? You want us to avoid having more than one vote on a player . . . ?
Click to expand...
Hahaha that's not what I said in the slightest. I've already said it now like seven times, I just didn't want a quick bandwagon forming, and the way AM hopped on coffee was weird to me. The fact that you are trying to throw shade my way about this is making me raise a brow.
 
PippyPony said:
I don't really get the distinction here
Click to expand...
To me it’s different than referring to something that happened in a past game. I feel it’s still part of this game. Yes I know it happened prior to roles going out, so it can’t give us clues on who is a wolf or not.

Look people, I’m just salty ok! Let me be salty if I want to.

I said it’s not a joke vote because 1) I’m really that salty. 2) to me a joke vote is something you fully intend to come back and change, given this is d1, it’s unlikely that something will happen that will make me strongly feel that someone else is a wolf or that cof? is village, so I do plan on keeping my vote there for today unless one of those unlikely scenarios occur. I’m not going to keep voting due to salt after today, as hopefully there will be more to analyze.
 
bryndiana.jones said:
Hahaha that's not what I said in the slightest. I've already said it now like seven times, I just didn't want a quick bandwagon forming, and the way AM hopped on coffee was weird to me. The fact that you are trying to throw shade my way about this is making me raise a brow.
Click to expand...

Then why did you put forth a scenario where both the current votes for Coffee? were from villagers? This doesn't feel like you building feels for anyone in particular. You're more concerned that someone could be a lazy lynch - which is fair, but they only had 2 votes. Your response is still weird and over the top to me.

I voted for you and then was asked to explain my vote further. I'm not trying to force shade onto you, I've been responding to your questions and Pip's.

bryndiana.jones said:
It's related to you voting for the only person who had any votes, and saying you will learn as you go but will likely make some mistakes. I get the later half but I'm guessing this game has two wolves, if you and skim aren't ones then all coffee needs are the wolves to hop on her lynch and one more villager, and she's toast. Correct me if I'm wrong, but my definition of checking in, is that the person hops on thread and posts something. So up to this point, you, Pip, Skim, Mel, SAR, and myself are the only ones who have checked in. I guess your vote could be artful, but my concern is about the potential speed at which this could gain steam, and result in a mislynch of someone who has yet to even post on thread.
Click to expand...
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Melchizedek said:
is this supposed to be a poly A tail?
Click to expand...
I'm not going to explain my superior humor to you

Melchizedek said:
lol you make it sound like I'm constantly inebriated...
I'm here, did you need something?
Click to expand...
No, we would never think that. You wanna maybe vote for someone before you ...go out again... tonight...?
 
Day 1 Please Refrain From Unzipping Your Genes Lynch Tally

coffee? (2) - skil, AM
AM (1) - pip
Skil (1) - SAR
Bj (1) - peebs
Peebs (1) - cheezit

@CoffeeQuestionMark you are winning!
Plurality = 5 votes
6/9 voting

Not voting: bj, coffee?, dolphin

Deadline: 10pm EST (~5 hours)

kitteh-in-bread-jpg.238807


~There's a non-zero chance I will be drunk for close if it doesn't happen early. Maybe even if it does happen early.~
 
PrincessButterCup said:
Then why did you put forth a scenario where both the current votes for Coffee? were from villagers? This doesn't feel like you building feels for anyone in particular. You're more concerned that someone could be a lazy lynch - which is fair, but they only had 2 votes. Your response is still weird and over the top to me.

I voted for you and then was asked to explain my vote further. I'm not trying to force shade onto you, I've been responding to your questions and Pip's.
Click to expand...
It was just speculation, but I am ready to move on and discuss other things.
 
PrincessButterCup said:
Then why did you put forth a scenario where both the current votes for Coffee? were from villagers? This doesn't feel like you building feels for anyone in particular. You're more concerned that someone could be a lazy lynch - which is fair, but they only had 2 votes. Your response is still weird and over the top to me.

I voted for you and then was asked to explain my vote further. I'm not trying to force shade onto you, I've been responding to your questions and Pip's.
Click to expand...
Oh, and to add to the above, I did say that AM voting that way was weird, which is exactly building feels for someone. I do have some for you as well cause this feels like how you wolfed a couple games back
 
bryndiana.jones said:
Coffee came on, made some comments about nerd stuff and how anyone could be a wolf, and left. Dolphin commented on me and that's it.
Click to expand...
How about SAR who also got on, defended me, then left?
Or Mel who came on, said he was hungover, came back to vote w/o reasons or discussions, and now is gone again?

Did you pick dolphin over these two because she mentioned your name?
Did you pick me because I have a cute dog and am rather punny?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
CoffeeQuestionMark said:
How about SAR who also got on, defended me, then left?
Or Mel who came on, said he was hungover, came back to vote w/o reasons or discussions, and now is gone again?

Did you pick dolphin over these two because she mentioned your name?
Did you pick me because I have a cute dog and am rather punny?
Click to expand...
This is true, but I feel I have a better idea of how Mel plays compared to the two of you. I wasn't trying to shade either of you, just trying to see what PBC thinks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

apoptosis09
JaWWs WW - Summer SWWashers Series #1 - GAME THREAD
22 23 24 25 26
Replies
1K
Views
27K
Clem J
Clem J
katiemcat
TWWilight (game thread)
14 15 16 17 18
Replies
893
Views
8K
beans2020
beans2020
kaydubs
Snack WWars (Game Thread)
55 56 57 58 59
Replies
3K
Views
82K
katiemcat
katiemcat
WildZoo
Supernatural: Angels & Demons WW Game Thread
121 122 123 124 125
Replies
6K
Views
177K
GoSpursGo
GoSpursGo
Zenge142
Zenge's Casino 2: WWhat HaWWpened To All That MoWWney?! - WW Game Thread
128 129 130 131 132
Replies
7K
Views
114K
mkg323
mkg323