- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 10,910
- Reaction score
- 1,154
Does PBL really suck that bad?
All I hear is negatives about it. I understand the principle of EBM and all, but how is PBL supposed to help one learn? Give us an example of what you have to do. From what I understand, it is about application of what you are supposed to be learning, but I've never seen a real example.
I guess I will be able to either gripe or rave about it this fall.
PBL sucks at OU because it's an educational afterthought that requires you to do busywork that you won't be tested on or receive any credit for in the weeks right before exams. PBL might maybe be okay at some other schools -- I don't know.
Your pbl group is one half of your mod. You show up and watch a video with a patient interview. Then you get some exam and test results. Then everyone stares at the floor for 20 minutes while you're supposed to discuss the case except for the one person who's actually caught up enough in class to have any clue what's going on. Everyone gets assigned a learning issue, which the pbl group is supposed to come up with. You spend 10 minutes researching that for the next session because the next session is the week before exams and again you get nothing for doing quality work and don't really have time anyway. Then you show up, present your stuff, and your group turns in a 1-2 page summary of what you talked about.
If pbl didn't always occur in the week right before exams. If we actually got credit for our work instead of just losing credit for not showing up. If it weren't tacked on as a total aside with no real integration with the rest of the class, etc., etc., etc. There's my pbl rant.
EBM actually sucks more than pbl to give you an idea of its horror. Needless to say I am not liking this week.