- Joined
- Apr 6, 2010
- Messages
- 149
- Reaction score
- 0
I've got a question regarding U of T MMI. Are we scored by the interviewers based on a standard, or are we scored relative to all other interviewees?
If we are scored based on a standard, then our marks reflect how good we are in absolute terms. A 70 is a 70 and a 90 is a 90. But if we are scored relative to all other interviewees at that time, then no matter how good you are, if others are better than you, you get a bad score; conversely, no matter how bad you are, if others are worse than you, then you can receive a pretty decent mark.
I think the interviewers compare your respnses to the person before you and after you and give you a mark. I think somebody already said something about seeing their score as the inteviewer marked it down but I believe he/she was marking the candidate before them. Í am just speculating but I think it makes sense to do it that way. For example, if you are the first person being interviewed your response might be good but if two others following you dont even fully comprehend the scenario let alone the answer, then your response becomes great and vice versa. So in a way I believe that it is standardized but it is all based on your ability to give fully developed yet concise responses. I MIGHT BE WAYYY OF HERE!!😉