- Joined
- Nov 24, 2002
- Messages
- 23,757
- Reaction score
- 12,106
Actually, vag bleeding is a sign (provided there is blood there). It's not a symptom.Chest pain, vaginal bleeding, headaches are all symptoms.
/quibble
Actually, vag bleeding is a sign (provided there is blood there). It's not a symptom.Chest pain, vaginal bleeding, headaches are all symptoms.
As for your other questions, trauma is a diagnosis that is generally managed by surgeons. Chest pain, vaginal bleeding, headaches are all symptoms. If a patient is having an MI, you will call cardiology, an ectopic pregnancy, you will call on/gyn, an intracranial hemorrhage, you will cal neurosurgery. You will not try and figure out if they hemorrhage is from amyloid, hypertension, AVM, tumor, etc - you will leave that to the neurosurgeon.
[...]
Like I said, I am all in favor of ED doctors learning trauma and learning it well. Many level 2 and level 3 centers will rely on them. However, once trauma activation arrives at the level 1 center, surgery should be in charge.
"Trauma" really isn't a diagnosis, either.
And there's the rub: EM needs to learn to manage trauma, and do it well. Meanwhile, all the surgeons feel they should be the ones managing it at the level 1 center, where most of the EM residencies are. Is watching someone else do something the best way to learn to do it? We're also the ones who will be managing it our entire careers, and see it just about every shift of every month of residency, while the majority of surgeons will gladly leave it behind forever once they graduate.
I've done more trauma as a resident than I care for (and I'm on 4th of July trauma call tomorrow, fml), and the workup and eval is very algorithmic and I honestly don't see what is so special about it that a surgeon has to run the initial trauma... Someone should be ATLS certified, but doing the abcde of the primary survey and following the algorithm for the appropriate workup doesn't require a surgeon, and on the inpatient world, the surgeon that does the initial eval is hardly the person providing the inpt care (that's the interns, apn's, and the rounding attending)... As the chief resident I'm responsible for all the in pts, not just the ones I admitted. I can get a turnover /sign-out from anyone and then assume the care.
We just ran a trauma (july 1st at 3am) that ended up with 80u prbc, 60 ffp, 30 platelets, fiba, cryo, at one point an ffp and fibrinogen drip. I get the value in those, that those even 5 minutes that would be delayed to get the surgeon involved would mean the pt wouldn't have made it out of the ed to the or (where we had to ligated the portal vein among other things... Im so jealous I didn't get in on that case). Last I checked pt was still alive too. But priority 2 traumas, even those don't REALLY need a surgeon to workup... But I'm also biased and jaded and hopeful I can sleep tomorrow nightThe point about continuity is that when you take care of trauma patients in the hospital you become familiar with complications/missed injuries that ED doctors never learn about.
Most initial traumas can be done by anyone. The difficult level one traumas need someone proficient at thinking quickly and acting quickly (i.e. lines, chest tube, pounding blood, etc). I've never seen a non-surgeon do that well except for an occasional anesthesiologist here and there. Otherwise, even medicine and anesthesia CC people are not as capable of massive resuscitation the way trauma surgeons are. I'm clearly biased.
The point about continuity is that when you take care of trauma patients in the hospital you become familiar with complications/missed injuries that ED doctors never learn about.
Most initial traumas can be done by anyone. The difficult level one traumas need someone proficient at thinking quickly and acting quickly (i.e. lines, chest tube, pounding blood, etc). I've never seen a non-surgeon do that well except for an occasional anesthesiologist here and there. Otherwise, even medicine and anesthesia CC people are not as capable of massive resuscitation the way trauma surgeons are. I'm clearly biased.
I agree, level 2's don't need a surgeon.But priority 2 traumas, even those don't REALLY need a surgeon to workup... But I'm also biased and jaded and hopeful I can sleep tomorrow night
As a member of the SONOS (Society of Non-Operative Surgeons), we intend to blur the lines between trauma surgeon and EM trauma attending.
By making trauma surgeons train and work less (with trauma patients) or make the EM attending train and work more?
I'll take "Things I don't say or do as an EM attending" for $200, Alex.By using the word "shop" a lot and wearing scrub tops tucked into khakis/cargo pants.
Ha!I'll take "Things I don't say or do as an EM attending" for $200, Alex.
Only here on SDN. True story. I have never once heard it anywhere in the "real world". Now, granted, that may be the "fallacy of anecdote" ("I've never seen it, so it doesn't exist"), but, as I say, IRL, nah.Ha!
But you can't deny that a lot of your colleagues do use the word "shop" to refer to the physical place they work.
Only here on SDN. True story. I have never once heard it anywhere in the "real world". Now, granted, that may be the "fallacy of anecdote" ("I've never seen it, so it doesn't exist"), but, as I say, IRL, nah.
That is the "ER mullet". I put a percentage on that of about 80%, if not wearing scrubs. I am one of the 20%. Dress pants, subtle aloha ("Hawai'ian", for you haole mainlanders) shirt, and white coat.How about scrub tops tucked into pants?
How about scrub tops tucked into pants?
I actually very rarely see that in the emergency department at my institution. Most of the residents or attendings just wear scrubs. Seems like that is more of a radiologist thing where I am at.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
We use it all the time. I understand some people get riled by the idea of our workplace being compared to a blue-collar vs. professional workplace but that's never bothered me. On the other hand I still get irrationally bothered by it being referred to as an emergency "room". The contagiousness of your attendings' cultural pathology is impressive.Only here on SDN. True story. I have never once heard it anywhere in the "real world". Now, granted, that may be the "fallacy of anecdote" ("I've never seen it, so it doesn't exist"), but, as I say, IRL, nah.
We use it all the time. I understand some people get riled by the idea of our workplace being compared to a blue-collar vs. professional workplace but that's never bothered me. On the other hand I still get irrationally bothered by it being referred to as an emergency "room". The contagiousness of your attendings' cultural pathology is impressive.
I confess to being guilty of the ER mullet in residency. It's a good look on exactly no one. I would say that most of my colleagues wear plain scrubs with some occasional white coat+scrub or the ubiquitous "night shift female doc apparel" of scrubs+hoodie.