D
deleted103644
I'll vote for shortnsweet, just so I can get that much closer to not dying...
I'll vote for shortnsweet, just so I can get that much closer to not dying...
One way to defend yourself would be to say what your role was. You don't even have to say the details, just the character name is fine. We just don't want to lynch a good guy, especially not one with an important role.To be honest, this is my first WW game so I wouldn't even really know how to defend myself. Trying to read through the forum now to catch up, but pretty far behind.
I suppose if someone has to be lynched it makes sense for it to be me since I've invested the least time... Short first game though. :/
One way to defend yourself would be to say what your role was. You don't even have to say the details, just the character name is fine. We just don't want to lynch a good guy, especially not one with an important role.
And what's the point of teams? (Really a complete noob, sorry. Just couldn't resist the GoT theme.)
We don't have a list but are trying to base it off what people with GoT knowledge think.Do we have a list of the roles anywhere? I wouldn't even know if someone were good or bad based off of their character name alone. Almost every character is both good and bad (except for the noble ones who die early).
You can PM your teammates. Don't be super loyal to them though because any of them could be a wolf trying to pump info from you.And what's the point of teams? (Really a complete noob, sorry. Just couldn't resist the GoT theme.)
TW and Lissa are doing a good job of answering your questions. Aside from those, you still need to say "lynch" for your vote to count -- i.e. lynch cuitlamiztli.I'll vote for shortnsweet, just so I can get that much closer to not dying...
TW and Lissa are doing a good job of answering your questions. Aside from those, you still need to say "lynch" for your vote to count -- i.e. lynch cuitlamiztli.
At this point jd, I'd say who you are, unless you plan on being up before 8
Unless your referring to no balls= beggar king
Not no balls = eunuch.
So your thinking varys. Not the other dude.
Oh goodness. I have viserys as definitely not good/probably evil and varys as meh ambiguous and maybe not good but a good investigator. I can't even decide who to vote for. And phew you guys post a lot.
I'm going to vote **** lynch JohnnyDrama******* cause I can't see either V_____ys characters being that good (though if varys is a good investigator I'll wanna slap myself)
Goodnight y'all. Awkward night for foxhunter. Time to sleep
Okay before I go to bed, now is as good a time as any since I don't feel comfortable with any names up for lynching yet.
My main suspicion is Devyn right now and here is why:
Devyn did not nominate herself for King and seemed to not want to be king, while still acting like she did to possibly avoid suspicion. She said she doesn't want to "seem like an ass" by voting for herself. I really does seem like the mayor gets investigated early and it could be a bad spot for a wolf. Also, jj voted for Lissa when the score was tied- possibly to get more votes for Lissa and votes away from devyn? Not sure about it all, but this is what I have to go on for now 🙂
Plus, devyn is still hilarious whether she's in the game or not! 😀
So for now lynch devyn
They used fire to kind of ward the white walkers off. The white walkers don't like fire. I can't remember if fire actually killed them, though. Anyways, I have it on good authority that johnnydrama is not who he claims to be.I think I need to give a primer on the spirit of GoT to the people here who arent familiar. As this falls within the same realm as the move i pulled on the loungers in my Skyrim game. "villagers" can be ambiguous and quite evil, but they remain vilagers. Evil is unquestionably evil. This was the case in my game and I think until we see more names up in red font, we have to assume its the case in this game. Plus it fits the spirit of GoT so well.
SPOILER AHEAD (its minor though)
In Game of Thrones every character is in some way deeply corrupt, except for Ned Stark. Even in that case he is honorable to a deadly fault as he'll choose honor over self-preservation in a world where everyone chooses the opposite. You can argue people with the Stark name are much more "good" than those with the "Lannister" name, but in the end they all have redeeming qualities and reasoning for what they do. The exception everyone points to is Joffrey. Joffrey Lannister is a psychopath. But he is (likely) not evil for the sake of this game. He is a human and likely is aligned against whatever the red-fonts are (wolves/evil/others whatever).
The best way to explain it is this. The guy in my avatar is Petyr Baelish. He is Ned Starks first friend in King's Landing (the capitol) when he arrives and is a bureaucrat of little influence but high ambition. His first piece of advice to Ned Stark is to not trust a god damned person, including Baelish himself. Especially Baelish himself. He tells him that everyone is on his side until you're in their way. Stark only takes the advice half to heart. Petyr works hard to continue to be Ned's best friend and adviser on everything. And when an opportunity to change the power structure of King's Landing arrives Baelish promises his support (and the support of the town guards, whom he owns) to both sides and then turns on whatever side looks weaker when they finally come to arms against each other. He is very literally the catalyst of almost all of the evil in the book in one way or another, and yet he is one of the most charming and outwardly "benevolent" characters there. Its only that we see his constant treachery that we realize he's evil to the core.
But I imagine whomever has Baelish actually is a very very useful villager. Because all the characters are like him. Wether outwardly evil or good, they are also plenty of the opposite when you evaluate their inner monolouge. Characters are all grey, ethically. So you should high a higher threshold for what might qualify for evil (In my opinion) and be disinclined to assume any human name is evil... until we see evidence in red text suggesting otherwise. Because right now our only confirmed villain is a zombie or an ice demon. Which are monsters, not humans. I still say its a zombie because you dont have to burn the white walkers (using tv terms) to kill them, you have to hit them with an obsidian blade. Its the wights/others/zombies that you need to burn. Unless i missed some of the books lore somewhere that had them burning a white walker
gave the impression that you weren't sure about yourself.Do we have a list of the roles anywhere? I wouldn't even know if someone were good or bad based off of their character name alone. Almost every character is both good and bad (except for the noble ones who die early).
I think I need to give a primer on the spirit of GoT to the people here who arent familiar. As this falls within the same realm as the move i pulled on the loungers in my Skyrim game. "villagers" can be ambiguous and quite evil, but they remain vilagers. Evil is unquestionably evil. This was the case in my game and I think until we see more names up in red font, we have to assume its the case in this game. Plus it fits the spirit of GoT so well.
SPOILER AHEAD (its minor though)
In Game of Thrones every character is in some way deeply corrupt, except for Ned Stark. Even in that case he is honorable to a deadly fault as he'll choose honor over self-preservation in a world where everyone chooses the opposite. You can argue people with the Stark name are much more "good" than those with the "Lannister" name, but in the end they all have redeeming qualities and reasoning for what they do. The exception everyone points to is Joffrey. Joffrey Lannister is a psychopath. But he is (likely) not evil for the sake of this game. He is a human and likely is aligned against whatever the red-fonts are (wolves/evil/others whatever).
The best way to explain it is this. The guy in my avatar is Petyr Baelish. He is Ned Starks first friend in King's Landing (the capitol) when he arrives and is a bureaucrat of little influence but high ambition. His first piece of advice to Ned Stark is to not trust a god damned person, including Baelish himself. Especially Baelish himself. He tells him that everyone is on his side until you're in their way. Stark only takes the advice half to heart. Petyr works hard to continue to be Ned's best friend and adviser on everything. And when an opportunity to change the power structure of King's Landing arrives Baelish promises his support (and the support of the town guards, whom he owns) to both sides and then turns on whatever side looks weaker when they finally come to arms against each other. He is very literally the catalyst of almost all of the evil in the book in one way or another, and yet he is one of the most charming and outwardly "benevolent" characters there. Its only that we see his constant treachery that we realize he's evil to the core.
But I imagine whomever has Baelish actually is a very very useful villager. Because all the characters are like him. Wether outwardly evil or good, they are also plenty of the opposite when you evaluate their inner monolouge. Characters are all grey, ethically. So you should high a higher threshold for what might qualify for evil (In my opinion) and be disinclined to assume any human name is evil... until we see evidence in red text suggesting otherwise. Because right now our only confirmed villain is a zombie or an ice demon. Which are monsters, not humans. I still say its a zombie because you dont have to burn the white walkers (using tv terms) to kill them, you have to hit them with an obsidian blade. Its the wights/others/zombies that you need to burn. Unless i missed some of the books lore somewhere that had them burning a white walker
Actually dyachei said you would know if you were a wolf or not, not if you were good or bad. In the Song of Ice and Fire series, most people are in a gray zone when it comes to morals.It's too early in the morning to be making a tough lynching choice. 🙁 I'm going to have to go with JD, though. If you are a villager, sorry. 🙁
lynch johnnydrama
You're just sending up flags all over the place. You ask if there's a list of roles after Lissa says telling your role would be a good defense, then say you're Viserys, then change to Varys after TW asks some more questions. Plus, dyachei clarified in the thread that everyone should be positive if they're good or bad, but the way you said
gave the impression that you weren't sure about yourself.
Sorry, I was using good and bad as shorthand for villager and wolf. That's how it read to me that JD was using it, in response to this:Actually dyachei said you would know if you were a wolf or not, not if you were good or bad. In the Song of Ice and Fire series, most people are in a gray zone when it comes to morals.
By which you meant villager, I think, but in retrospect JD may not have realized that.One way to defend yourself would be to say what your role was. You don't even have to say the details, just the character name is fine. We just don't want to lynch a good guy, especially not one with an important role.