- Joined
- Dec 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,814
- Reaction score
- 11
👍
I also thought there was a prevented attack because of the garlic. That's what the write up made it sound like.
So now this is where I'm confused. First we are told to not talk the write-ups seriously, and then we do take it seriously and then we're told not to. So which is it? Which write-ups are we supposed to take facts from and when were we not supposed to? Or am I missing what the whole "read the write-ups" argument was about in the first place 😕😕