Is anyone else concerned about the ability to specialize coming out of Roseman? The combination of no ranking, no GPA, and P/F NDBE leaves little room to stand out objectively. I got a great vibe when I visited for my interview, but the fact that Roseman is such a new school that hasn't graduated a class yet worries me. While schools like UCSF have a great reputation to back up their P/NP grading system, Roseman is too new to have any reputation yet. Some schools have even altered the P/NP to include an Honors distinction.
My interviewer told me it's all up in the air and the students that enter postdoctoral programs from the first graduating class will make or break the school's reputation. Why would a PD choose a Roseman student over a top 10 ranked student, high GPA student, or a student graduating from a tried and true d-school? Yes, externships and other ec's will help, but they aren't the deciding factor. Also, my interviewer said PDs love the "bragging rights" of a highly ranked student coming from University of This Prestigious D-School. Roseman has neither the rep nor the ability to differentiate students, and now the P/F NDBE eliminates an even playing field on the national level.
Don't get me wrong, I love the non-competitive nature of Roseman. It was a huge plus for me. I love the school in general and I want to want to go there, but this is my major concern. Does anyone applying this cycle want to specialize? I'd love to hear your thoughts.