Is there a national ranking list for CT anesthesia programs?
Gathering information from previous posts, seems Cleveland Clinic, Duke and THI are top programs with Columbia, Stanford, MGH/BWH closely following.Is there a national ranking list for CT anesthesia programs?
Was wondering more so for programs that are not as big name institutions. For instance buffalo versus Albany.Gathering information from previous posts, seems Cleveland Clinic, Duke and THI are top programs with Columbia, Stanford, MGH/BWH closely following.
Like ranking for annual snow fall?Was wondering more so for programs that are not as big name institutions. For instance buffalo versus Albany.
Even if this list did exist, I would highly recommend ignoring "prestige" when it comes to making a rank list. Train where you will be the happiest. Train where you want to work in the future. Stop chasing clout.Is there a national ranking list for CT anesthesia programs?
UT Houston is split between Memorial Herman and Methodist. Memorial herman does a lot more bread-and-butter cases. Methodist does a lot of transplants and "bigger" cases. They are an up-and-coming program. The fellows are well trained. It's compared to BCM/THI a lot just because they are across the street from each other. You mainly sit your own cases there.Can anyone comment on this program? Is it comparable to Baylor?
Is there a national ranking list for CT anesthesia programs?
PM me with your contact info and I can discuss in much more detail. Are you applying in this cycle?Was wondering more so for programs that are not as big name institutions. For instance buffalo versus Albany.
I think you mainly should focus on what you want out of the fellowship.Is there a national ranking list for CT anesthesia programs?
In case it's unclear, the list of "best cardiac anesthesia fellowships" on a "CARDIOLOGY FELLOW" website should not be trusted.Best Cardiac Anesthesia Fellowships Ranking List | Cardiology Fellowships
Find out what the 10 best cardiac anesthesia fellowships are and read our application tips and some common mistakes people make when applying to programs.www.cardiologyfellowships.net
That is certainly unique. Very cool. I hung out with the cardiologist while they did the structural heart echoes but did none myself. We were pretty low volume for things like mitra-clips and valve-in-valve cases etc.I sometimes read this forum and can’t help but jump in with a controversial take with something I figured out during my fellowship interview process. For the record I did both residency and fellowship at BIDMC.
I started by applying widely for ACTA, had a very competitive application, and received interviews to almost everywhere I applied. I went on interviews to Duke, Columbia, THI, etc. All these programs were powerhouses in the fact you will get to do really big cases – lots of transplants, LVADs, lines, circ arrests, research, etc. They will all prepare you to practice in a similar environment and do these cases.
The thing they are all missing and where I felt BIDMC is different - structural heart. Even as a CA2 I was in the room holding the probe with Mahmood over my shoulder doing ASD closure, VSD closure, PVL closure, mitraclip, Watchman, TAVR with 3D TEE (sizing valve, coronary heights, etc), valve-in-valve mitral/tricuspid, etc. As a fellow you do this room 1-2 times per week and it’s the best TEE training on the planet. The volume of structural heart is immense and anesthesia residents/fellows get to hold the probe and are intimately involved throughout these cases. As a fellow you will learn with interventional cardiology, etc.
The big wakeup I remember (coming off a CA2 month doing TEE - essentially following Dr Mahmood around) was following other fellows in the OR during interviews. By that time, I knew more about TEE than the Jan/Feb/Mar fellows I shadowed in the OR during these interview days. What I perceived as lack of TEE skill in the second half of fellowship at the above programs was mind-blowing and concerning. And I’m sure they studied up at the end of the year and passed TEE boards without any issue. But the nagging feeling I left with that the TEE training at all these programs was garbage in comparison - was a feeling I couldn’t shake the entire rest of the year and the reason I stayed at BIDMC.
I’m now in private practice and director of a big structural heart program. When the cardiologists are having difficulty with imaging a mitraclip they call me. When they need TEE sizing for TAVR with high Cr they book around my schedule. I am integral the success of the program and these relationships have meant the world during hospital contracts, committees, etc.
I think I am equally as comfortable doing the type A on call, transplant, or LVAD as anyone from any of those above programs although my case numbers would likely be less than any of those above programs.
Just realize there are pluses and minuses to everything you pick and there is a reason BIDMC would be seen as #1 on a cardiology website and it’s for very good reason. A reason that may be more likely to translate to professional success for the rest of your career than many of the other programs mentioned. Good luck during the fellowship interview and matching process.
It is great that you found a job that lets you maximize your training, but the reality, as abolt mentioned, is that cardiologists do the structural heart echos and they refuse to share in most parts of this country. It is not about who has the skillset, but about the political landscape. I also trained at a place (not bid) where we held the probe and I felt very comfortable doing it by the end of my fellowship, but at least in the city that I am limited to, the echos are all done by the cardiologists, and they will never let me hold the probe until the political landscape changes.I sometimes read this forum and can’t help but jump in with a controversial take with something I figured out during my fellowship interview process. For the record I did both residency and fellowship at BIDMC.
I started by applying widely for ACTA, had a very competitive application, and received interviews to almost everywhere I applied. I went on interviews to Duke, Columbia, THI, etc. All these programs were powerhouses in the fact you will get to do really big cases – lots of transplants, LVADs, lines, circ arrests, research, etc. They will all prepare you to practice in a similar environment and do these cases.
The thing they are all missing and where I felt BIDMC is different - structural heart. Even as a CA2 I was in the room holding the probe with Mahmood over my shoulder doing ASD closure, VSD closure, PVL closure, mitraclip, Watchman, TAVR with 3D TEE (sizing valve, coronary heights, etc), valve-in-valve mitral/tricuspid, etc. As a fellow you do this room 1-2 times per week and it’s the best TEE training on the planet. The volume of structural heart is immense and anesthesia residents/fellows get to hold the probe and are intimately involved throughout these cases. As a fellow you will learn with interventional cardiology, etc.
The big wakeup I remember (coming off a CA2 month doing TEE - essentially following Dr Mahmood around) was following other fellows in the OR during interviews. By that time, I knew more about TEE than the Jan/Feb/Mar fellows I shadowed in the OR during these interview days. What I perceived as lack of TEE skill in the second half of fellowship at the above programs was mind-blowing and concerning. And I’m sure they studied up at the end of the year and passed TEE boards without any issue. But the nagging feeling I left with that the TEE training at all these programs was garbage in comparison - was a feeling I couldn’t shake the entire rest of the year and the reason I stayed at BIDMC.
I’m now in private practice and director of a big structural heart program. When the cardiologists are having difficulty with imaging a mitraclip they call me. When they need TEE sizing for TAVR with high Cr they book around my schedule. I am integral the success of the program and these relationships have meant the world during hospital contracts, committees, etc.
I think I am equally as comfortable doing the type A on call, transplant, or LVAD as anyone from any of those above programs although my case numbers would likely be less than any of those above programs.
Just realize there are pluses and minuses to everything you pick and there is a reason BIDMC would be seen as #1 on a cardiology website and it’s for very good reason. A reason that may be more likely to translate to professional success for the rest of your career than many of the other programs mentioned. Good luck during the fellowship interview and matching process.
What a laughable list ....wowIn case it's unclear, the list of "best cardiac anesthesia fellowships" on a "CARDIOLOGY FELLOW" website should not be trusted.
Abolt where you do fellowship?That is certainly unique. Very cool. I hung out with the cardiologist while they did the structural heart echoes but did none myself. We were pretty low volume for things like mitra-clips and valve-in-valve cases etc.
Of note, when I went to echo week in Atlanta last year, they were talking all about structural heart stuff before they eventually said "Raise your hand if the anesthesiologists are doing the echo at your institution for structural heart cases" and it was easily less than 10% who raised their hands, as cardiology is doing these at the large majority of institutions.
So, while doing a bunch of structural heart likely develops awesome echo skills, it is likely not essential to 90+% of practicing cardiac anesthesiologists. (Same could be said for LVADs, lung txps, etc. I realize)
Not saying someone shouldn't want to do it, just that it does not necessarily need to be a deal-breaker for someone.
same boat lol, couldn't be bothered to Grind that hard again after CA1 ITE and Basic. I heard some places ask for it anyone know where?Does CA2 ITE matter? Went down a lot from last year
Why would you go back to being a fellow after making 650-700k a year? Itch is just an itch. Don’t do it. Only do it if it literally kills you from the inside that you are not doing these cases.I did a crit care fellowship. I keep having this itch to go and do a CT fellowship but I make about $650-700k and that alone makes it hard to go back . I really do like cardiac a lot and enjoy those cases
Let me be clear there’s like a 5% chance I go back. Wish I could thoughWhy would you go back to being a fellow after making 650-700k a year? Itch is just an itch. Don’t do it. Only do it if it literally kills you from the inside that you are not doing these cases.
Dang they pay intensivists that much? I did not know lolLet me be clear there’s like a 5% chance I go back. Wish I could though
DM for detailsDang they pay intensivists that much? I did not know lol
Well, one could make the same argument for a CA-3 to not do fellowship and go straight into private practice. The only real difference is that the CA-3 hasn't had any lifestyle inflation or experienced how nice it is to not be a trainee.Why would you go back to being a fellow after making 650-700k a year? Itch is just an itch. Don’t do it. Only do it if it literally kills you from the inside that you are not doing these cases.
I’d say it’s more that programs fall on a spectrum between those two extremes. There are plenty of balanced programs where your time is divided between resident supervision and doing your own cases.Well, one could make the same argument for a CA-3 to not do fellowship and go straight into private practice. The only real difference is that the CA-3 hasn't had any lifestyle inflation or experienced how nice it is to not be a trainee.
Any fellowship year is a ~half million dollar opportunity cost whether you do it right after residency or years later.
There are advantages to going back to fellowship after some time as an attending. Most of us who've done that are glad we did.
Anyway, the only other thing I'd add to the discussion of evaluating fellowship programs is that they can be divided, very broadly, into two types of fellowship: the "echo fellowship" in which the fellow does mostly supervisory work with residents and/or floats from OR to OR to do TEE, and the "workhorse fellowship" in which the fellows sit their own cases start to finish.
I was not personally impressed with the idea of doing an echo fellowship, so I chose a non supervisory program. The upside was I got amazing training and spent a lot of time in the OR. The downside was that at 5 PM on June 30th they had my slave ass in an OR doing a case.
I'm sure that's true. I didn't look closely at a large number of programs, but the ones I did were very tilted one way or the other. I think I can count on one hand how many times I worked with a resident during my fellowship - just a couple of transplant cases on call.I’d say it’s more that programs fall on a spectrum between those two extremes. There are plenty of balanced programs where your time is divided between resident supervision and doing your own cases.
If you are a type of fellow that would just bail after induction and echo and just want to coast through the fellowship, what pgg said is absolutely true. If you are a motivated fellow that treats every case as your own, you get the best of the both worlds by going to a fellowship that lets you supervise 60-70% of the time. How much educational value does a case offer during CPB? You can use that time to go to another room for more exposure.I'm sure that's true. I didn't look closely at a large number of programs, but the ones I did were very tilted one way or the other. I think I can count on one hand how many times I worked with a resident during my fellowship - just a couple of transplant cases on call.
When I was applying, I figured that every day I wasn't in an OR doing my own cases was going to be a day that left useful experience on the table. I was leaving practice as an attending and was going to be a geographic bachelor for the year, so I was giving up a lot for the experience. I wanted to squeeze every bit of benefit possible out of the year.
I feel pretty strongly that when it comes to learning and improving, supervision is inferior to doing cases yourself (incidentally - this is one of my primary dissatisfactions with ACT work in general). I think residents and fellows should be in ORs for long hours, not breezing in and out to do a bit of this and that here and there. I was also very put off by one of my interviews at a supervisory fellowship and decided I didn't want to be like them or a product of their system.
Usual caveats - anyone can coast through just about any fellowship and graduate. What you look like on the other side depends more on you and the case load you're exposed to than how the fellowship is structured.
Hey, that's my job as the attendingIf you are a type of fellow that would just bail after induction and echo and just want to coast through the fellowship, what pgg said is absolutely true. If you are a motivated fellow that treats every case as your own, you get the best of the both worlds by going to a fellowship that lets you supervise 60-70% of the time. How much educational value does a case offer during CPB? You can use that time to go to another room for more exposure.
. How much educational value does a case offer during CPB? .
I love these kind of comments. So unbiased. So you handle the 'crisis' in your room that you recognize and treat all by yourself. I do the same except I get called into the room two minutes into it by the intern/resident/CRNA and have to catch up and figure out what is going on within seconds. But then a different crisis happens in one of my other rooms that afternoon so I actually end up having to manage two crises that day while you only get to manage one. And I'm exposed to way more 'conditions' because I'm covering three rooms, sometimes all over the hospital. But you're the strongest anesthesiologist? Not saying I am either, just saying this belief is ridiculous.I think there’s a ton of value in doing your own cases all day every day for years . In more than one environment so you can get used to all different kinds of conditions. Those will always be the strongest anesthesiologists.
I agree that you can learn a lot from surgeons and a good cardiac anesthesiologist should have a very good understanding of the surgical techniques. But you can talk to the surgeons, and any reasonable surgeon at an academic institution will be happy to explain what they did. You don’t need to spend a few hours sitting the case for it. I learned a ton from our surgeons during fellowship, but it was nice to have the option of doing something more productive during cpb rather than being chained to the room.IMO there is tremendous value in actually watching the surgery all or most of the way through to understand what was done, how it was done, what problems they ran into, what if any plans changed, why it's taking longer or shorter than expected, etc.
There really aren’t any crises in my roomsI love these kind of comments. So unbiased. So you handle the 'crisis' in your room that you recognize and treat all by yourself. I do the same except I get called into the room two minutes into it by the intern/resident/CRNA and have to catch up and figure out what is going on within seconds. But then a different crisis happens in one of my other rooms that afternoon so I actually end up having to manage two crises that day while you only get to manage one. And I'm exposed to way more 'conditions' because I'm covering three rooms, sometimes all over the hospital. But you're the strongest anesthesiologist? Not saying I am either, just saying this belief is ridiculous.
Lol same here. To fix the itch, I took the adult cardiac boards. And passed. The itch is gone.I did a crit care fellowship. I keep having this itch to go and do a CT fellowship but I make about $650-700k and that alone makes it hard to go back . I really do like cardiac a lot and enjoy those cases
Ahh gotcha. Well good for you. Shame though that the best in our field is doing knee scopes and carpal tunnels. Well I’m sure if god forbid a crisis did occur you wouldn’t be rusty at all.There really aren’t any crises in my rooms
Ahh gotcha. Well good for you. Shame though that the best in our field is doing knee scopes and carpal tunnels. Well I’m sure if god forbid a crisis did occur you wouldn’t be rusty at all.
I think what he's getting at is that if you're stamping out one crisis after another, there's probably an issue with anticipating and preventing said crises. Some of that is on the CRNA in the room, but most of it is on the anesthesiologist who made the plan.So you handle the 'crisis' in your room that you recognize and treat all by yourself. I do the same except I get called into the room two minutes into it by the intern/resident/CRNA and have to catch up and figure out what is going on within seconds. But then a different crisis happens in one of my other rooms
All good and well but you obviously don't work in a major academic center with trainees (anesthesia and surgical), traveling CRNA's, and frequent ASA 4's and 5's. It is not just surgical misadventures that pop up, and you can't be in the room all the time and shouldn't be because residents have to learn to troubleshoot. In your job if you're only putting out fires (crises, decompensations, issues, whatever you want to call it) once a year then that's great for your quality of life but may not make you the 'strongest anesthesiologist' that you think you are. It is actually ideal that neither of you work in academics because with your elite preparation skills there would never be any intraoperative issues so trainees would never learn intraop diagnosing/intervening. And it probably looks like you're doing nothing at all in your ASA 2 LMA CRNA room because .... you actually aren't doing anything.“The hardest part of an operation is all well before incision”
a major academic center with [...] and frequent ASA 4's and 5's
in your ASA 2 LMA CRNA room
It is actually ideal that neither of you work in academics
There it is.mix of ASA 4 and 5 decorts, penetrating thoracic trauma, thoracic source control operations for infection
Not sure how competitive it was last year, other than number of applicants slowly dwindling. Is there any data on how many people applied? I definitely do think that the top tier places are always going to be very competitive no matter what. What makes you think that this year is more?Does anyone feel this year’s ACTA match is more competitive than last year?
Not sure how competitive it was last year, other than number of applicants slowly dwindling. Is there any data on how many people applied? I definitely do think that the top tier places are always going to be very competitive no matter what. What makes you think that this year is more?
Does anyone feel this year’s ACTA match is more competitive than last year?