Diner WW sign up & game thread

[SARdoghandler]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Why are you wolfreading Barks?

She's been busy, but I usually expect even when she's busy that in the time she has she comes on with some solid reads and content that I'm usually agreeing with. So far today she's made a very wishy washy statement on Cubs where she thinks maybe he's not a wolf yet, but she's not getting village vibes, so he is gonna sit neutral. Then made a comment about Cyndia's read on Coops being wishy washy.

It pinged my feels because I expect more reads from her than that - feels like she is coasting and trying to look like she's put thought in when she's here but without anything of real substance

 

[Animal Midwife]

She's been busy, but I usually expect even when she's busy that in the time she has she comes on with some solid reads and content that I'm usually agreeing with. So far today she's made a very wishy washy statement on Cubs where she thinks maybe he's not a wolf yet, but she's not getting village vibes, so he is gonna sit neutral. Then made a comment about Cyndia's read on Coops being wishy washy.

It pinged my feels because I expect more reads from her than that - feels like she is coasting and trying to look like she's put thought in when she's here but without anything of real substance

So who do you think is her partner then if not Cyndia?

 

[SARdoghandler]

Hmmm. Not a fan of this.

"this" = ?

The Cyndia vote? Some other specific comment? I feel like you mean the way the Cyndia vote is forming, but wanted to make sure I was contexting correctly

 

[SARdoghandler]

So who do you think is her partner then if not Cyndia?

Barks/Cubs could be interesting if you infer the soft defense but then non-commital read could be trying to take some heat away from a wolf partner. Suffers again from Cubs yeeting Barks in the joke phase of voting, but it directly followed my yeet of Barks so could potentially have been intentional distancing

Otherwise, she hasn't had a lot of direct interaction, so I could see a lot of the roster on that pair at this point except for me village reading second taking them off the possible pairing. Mel could be a possibility as well, no real interactions there yet to analyze yet

 

[cubsrule4e]

Just a gut feel observation but this Mel/Coop exchange feels the most "intentional" or "coordinated" of all the interactions ive seen today.

 

[SARdoghandler]

Just a gut feel observation but this Mel/Coop exchange feels the most "intentional" or "coordinated" of all the interactions ive seen today.

So you think it has potential to be w/w?

 

[cubsrule4e]

Barks/Cubs could be interesting if you infer the soft defense but then non-commital read could be trying to take some heat away from a wolf partner. Suffers again from Cubs yeeting Barks in the joke phase of voting, but it directly followed my yeet of Barks so could potentially have been intentional distancing

Otherwise, she hasn't had a lot of direct interaction, so I could see a lot of the roster on that pair at this point except for me village reading second taking them off the possible pairing. Mel could be a possibility as well, no real interactions there yet to analyze yet

On timestamp it looks several minutes after yours, but in real time I was literally typing and had the intent to post it the same time as you because I was still reading through the rest of the page before I actually posted it. So we made the same joke at the same time, mine just looks delayed. As soon as I posted, yours showed up and thats why I had to change mine right after.

 

[cubsrule4e]

So you think it has potential to be w/w?

Thats the implication, but I have no reasons to vote them otherwise. Keeping it in mind for later.

 

[Animal Midwife]

Thats the implication, but I have no reasons to vote them otherwise. Keeping it in mind for later.

Like how much later?

 

[Coopah]

Like how much later?

I mean zero offense but sometimes I think you ask questions just to ask them because I cannot fathom the depths of your internal ruminations

 

[cubsrule4e]

I mean zero offense but sometimes I think you ask questions just to ask them because I cannot fathom the depths of your internal ruminations

Saying things just to say them. AM can do it, just no one else.

 

[cubsrule4e]

Like how much later?

Like an hour? Tomorrow? As the game progresses and more thing happen?

 

[WildZoo]

"this" = ?

The Cyndia vote? Some other specific comment? I feel like you mean the way the Cyndia vote is forming, but wanted to make sure I was contexting correctly

The Cyndia vote

 

[WildZoo]

Like how much later?

Day 5 I bet

 

[Animal Midwife]

I mean zero offense but sometimes I think you ask questions just to ask them because I cannot fathom the depths of your internal ruminations

I'm aware. You've been saying this every game for almost 4 years now.

Like an hour? Tomorrow? As the game progresses and more thing happen?

An hour is not the same as tomorrow. I am curious about how seriously you feel about this since you're voting with them both right now. What's the maximum length of this game, do you think?

 

[kaydubs]

Day 1 Vote/Yeet Tally
SAR (2) - DubZ, Cyndia
Cyndia (4) - Barks, cubs, Coops, Mel
Coopah ()
Mel ()
cubs (1) - AM
Barks (1) - SAR
AM ()
DubZ ()

8/8

@Cyndia - you are winning.

Missing: N/A

Deadline closes TODAY at 10pm (~55 minutes)

 

[cubsrule4e]

I'm aware. You've been saying this every game for almost 4 years now.

An hour is not the same as tomorrow. I am curious about how seriously you feel about this since you're voting with them right now. What's the maximum length of this game, do you think?

I swear. I get pressed for providing "no game content" and then when I see something that I feel may be a little off I put it on thread for discussion, see if others feel the same, and then I get hammered about what is the deeper meaning of it and then need to give 6 reasons why I said what I said when I explicitly stated it wasnt proof of anything. Its like im being framed for trying to hedge on something that I never was trying to use as solid evidence of anything. Its completely ridiculous.

 

[kaydubs]

(When I mod solo, I have to be present for the painstaking last 10 minutes....or do I )

 

[Coopah]

(When I mod solo, I have to be present for the painstaking last 10 minutes....or do I )

Nah, it's a small enough game that we can handle it 😉

 

[Melchizedek]

Could you clarify attempt to make "discussion"? I think she did actually generate discussion

Nah she put something out there, saw it was explained and wasn’t sketchy, then she backtracked said that the thing she originally pointed out was actually village. It’s all reading like smokescreen

 

[Animal Midwife]

I swear. I get pressed for providing "no game content" and then when I see something that I feel may be a little off I put it on thread for discussion, see if others feel the same, and then I get hammered about what is the deeper meaning of it and then need to give 6 reasons why I said what I said when I explicitly stated it wasnt proof of anything. Its like im being framed for trying to hedge on something that I never was trying to use as solid evidence of anything. Its completely ridiculous.

Discussion shouldn't involve others actually replying because it's all a frame job. Good to know.

 

[cubsrule4e]

Discussion shouldn't involve others actually replying because it's all a frame job. Good to know.

What does this even mean? You didnt opine on what I actually said, if you agree, disagree, thoughts on either player in general - just made some comment just to comment which you know theres no answer for.

 

[WildZoo]

@Animal Midwife Now that it has played out, my coop read was fake. Was seeing how she would react to it. The complete acceptance and reciprocal read gives her a wolf point. But I'm hesitant to vote there based on reaction test alone.

 

[Animal Midwife]

What does this even mean? You didnt opine on what I actually said, if you agree, disagree, thoughts on either player in general - just made some comment just to comment which you know theres no answer for.

Let me break it down.

cubs: can someone comment on my thoughts?
AM: *comments on thoughts*
cubs: why are you always scrutinizing everything I say?

 

[Animal Midwife]

@Animal Midwife Now that it has played out, my coop read was fake. Was seeing how she would react to it. The complete acceptance and reciprocal read gives her a wolf point. But I'm hesitant to vote there based on reaction test alone.

Okay, interesting. Have any of her posts outside of the reciprocation from today bothered you?

 

[WildZoo]

Okay, interesting. Have any of her posts outside of the reciprocation from today bothered you?

Posts about Cyndia and Mel seem a bit at odds with vote placement, otherwise nothing glaring.

 

[cubsrule4e]

Let me break it down.

cubs: can someone comment on my thoughts?
AM: *comments on thoughts*
cubs: why are you always scrutinizing everything I say?

I see no comments made by you. Just some pointless question thats not even related to the content of what I posted.

 

[Cyndia]

Welp. Disappeared for dinner and now I’m leading. I was trying not to get too invested in this game because I knew I’d be the easy d1 vote after last game but it’s still annoying. I’m vanillager. Eyeing Mel for his responses, but also I’m a few glasses of wine in so haven’t had a chance to read into the most recent posts carefully. I’m staying on SAR for now.

 

[Animal Midwife]

I see no comments made by you. Just some pointless question thats not even related to the content of what I posted.

Can you just talk to me without criticizing my playstyle every other post? It's not changing my strategy and it prolongs any debates we have. Even when you claim to village read me, this stuff still come up and delays progress regarding my read of you. It got old a year ago.

 

[Coopah]

@Animal Midwife Now that it has played out, my coop read was fake. Was seeing how she would react to it. The complete acceptance and reciprocal read gives her a wolf point. But I'm hesitant to vote there based on reaction test alone.

Ooooooo fascinating. So does that mean you think I'm sketch?

 

[Coopah]

Posts about Cyndia and Mel seem a bit at odds with vote placement, otherwise nothing glaring.

In what way does it seem odd with vote placement? I voted where I said I'd vote, I got on when I could.

 

[WildZoo]

I'm sentimental and having a hard time pulling the trigger on either coop or Mel D1 when they haven't played in a while

 

[SARdoghandler]

I'm sentimental and having a hard time pulling the trigger on either coop or Mel D1 when they haven't played in a while

I think I'm offended that you would pull the trigger on me instead 😛

 

[WildZoo]

In what way does it seem odd with vote placement? I voted where I said I'd vote, I got on when I could.

Switching off of Mel and then still talking about why he's sketchy, and voting for Cyndia despite thinking she was generating discussion

 

[WildZoo]

I think I'm offended that you would pull the trigger on me instead 😛

You've played more recently!

 

[WildZoo]

Ooooooo fascinating. So does that mean you think I'm sketch?

That is typically what wolf points mean

 

[SARdoghandler]

You've played more recently!

Fine. I will temper my offense

 

[Animal Midwife]

I haven't had any success discussing anything with Mel so I'm feeling bummed.

 

[Coopah]

Switching off of Mel and then still talking about why he's sketchy, and voting for Cyndia despite thinking she was generating discussion

That's an interesting perspective, but offering counter arguments to statements is not the same thing as thinking someone is sketchy. I do think she was generating discussion, that does not preclude her from being a wolf. I have said before I'm not sure about Mel, (he seems weird) therefore it seems logical to put my best read forward.

 

[Coopah]

That is typically what wolf points mean

Oh boy I'm so excite!

 

[SARdoghandler]

I haven't had any success discussing anything with Mel so I'm feeling bummed.

Does that affect your read on him?

 

[Animal Midwife]

Does that affect your read on him?

I don't know.

 

[Coopah]

That's an interesting perspective, but offering counter arguments to statements is not the same thing as thinking someone is sketchy. I do think she was generating discussion, that does not preclude her from being a wolf. I have said before I'm not sure about Mel, (he seems weird) therefore it seems logical to put my best read forward.

Furthermore, those statement regarding cyndia were questioning my other sketch read and seemed like a reasonable line of thinking to further investigate him.

 

[Coopah]

~TEN MINUTE COUNTDOWN~ (so kaydubs doesn't have to)

 

[WildZoo]

Furthermore, those statement regarding cyndia were questioning my other sketch read and seemed like a reasonable line of thinking to further investigate him.

So what made you choose Cyndia over staying with the Mel vote?

 

[kaydubs]

Day 1 Vote/Yeet Tally
SAR (2) - DubZ, Cyndia
Cyndia (4) - Barks, cubs, Coops, Mel
Coopah ()
Mel ()
cubs (1) - AM
Barks (1) - SAR
AM ()
DubZ ()

8/8

@Cyndia - you are winning.

Missing: N/A

Deadline closes TODAY at 10pm (~9 minutes)

 

[Coopah]

So what made you choose Cyndia over staying with the Mel vote?

Because my Mel read is based on much less (in my opinion) than my cyndia read. Cyndia is backtracking and trying to earn cred (again in my opinion) by saying "that's what I would do as a wolf" and other things whereas Mel is much more "lol it was a reaction test idk". So yeah I went with Cyndia.

 

[Coopah]

So what made you choose Cyndia over staying with the Mel vote?

I will also say however I really don't like Mel's vote. It feels weird. If she flips village I'm going there next as a potential pack would be SAR/Mel

 

[Cyndia]

Because my Mel read is based on much less (in my opinion) than my cyndia read. Cyndia is backtracking and trying to earn cred (again in my opinion) by saying "that's what I would do as a wolf" and other things whereas Mel is much more "lol it was a reaction test idk". So yeah I went with Cyndia.

Fyi that’s just how I reason and play. Not trying to earn cred, just thinking through my opinions on thread to be transparent and get discussion going.

 

[Coopah]

Fyi that’s just how I reason and play. Not trying to earn cred, just thinking through my opinions on thread to be transparent and get discussion going.

If in the future I come back and you come back I'll keep that in mind (assuming you flip village, if not you sneaky sneak)