Seems to me you could poke others who you feel are participating at a subpar levelthe cubs focus feels a bit like deja vu
It sent before I was ready, but I edited my post.I'm confused what you're asking
Everyone who thought starting the game off with a random 8-way for 24+ hours and not making any useful content posts was great.
Yeet Mel
Wow my phone autocorrected yeet to testI clearly do not use hip terminology
Which of these posts is giving you a village tone read @WildZoo? I pulled out only the game-relevant posts, but they look NAI to me at best.Oh whoops sporty isn't playing. Zero reading comprehension
It was probably the HP posts
I'm serious, dubz.It was probably the HP posts
Just saying cubs is like your new capri/Ms P it seems. He made a valid comment that was actually content and the first thing you do is call him a wolf, and I'm not sure I understand the train of thought that led there.
Well I need participation from a few more people before I wax too poetic on my own thoughts. In short, it's an overall posting cadence and not any one post in particular.
Not calling him a wolf yet, but I’m not getting as much village vibes from cubs this game like I was last game
It was "content" in the sense that he admitted he was saying things simply to say things and has yet to do anything else. Don't see the comparison to capri/MsP as I've only unintentionally misyote him once and have correctly caught him every time he was a wolf or exclusive 3p.
My point is this was a very quick jump from cubs making an actual game-related comment to you saying he's howling. I could see it coming later from the disengagement in the discussion, but the immediacy seems odd. My impression is that you are quick to vote for cubs for any reason, just as he often seems quick to focus on you. How often you are intentionally or unintentionally incorrect is not going to mean much to me until I have a read on you.
What differences are you seeing?
Even if I do vote cubs often, isn't it for the best since it seems to help me read him correctly? Me getting a read on another player shouldn't affect your reads unless you plan to sheep me.
Because he was the only one that ignored my question to, instead, make another NAI post.
It affects me getting a read on you 😉
Yes, and like I said I understand that, I was talking about the initial howling comment
I was feeling more of an argumentative tone but then it was pointed out that it was against AM only who wasn’t in the last game so now I’m left thinking about how AI it really is. But either way I still have him more neutral from his tone than last game where I pretty quickly thought village
It's because it's aggro or nothing. Soft comments can't catch hardened wolves.
This feels wishy washy to me
Well now you've jinxed it!
Yeah I have to go to work now where we’ll probably be slammed..... again....
This feels wishy washy to me
Who else was just saying things to say things in this thread?
This is pretty ironic considering you've been sitting on a joke vote without discussing anyone else for almost 36 hours now. Do you think it helps village catch wolves to say things you don't actually mean and discuss Harry?
I will laugh real hard if she's a wolf again
It actually matters more in a plurality game than a majority game. In a majority game, you have to be careful where and when you move to prevent maj or information loss the further the game goes on. With pluarilty, it's better to vote early and often since there literally nothing mechanically negative that can occur from have that extra info sooner.
How do you feel about Cyndia?
You can pressure whoever your voting with enough time for them to respond. Actions speak louder than words and all that. Sharing reads is better than no reads at all but at the end of the day your vote shows what you really want to happen.But what is mechanically positive about having my vote somewhere continuously or immediately at 9am? Im speaking so people know what my reads are, and those change as the day progresses, as do votes. Also, if we learned anything from last game, mechanics are unreliable. Your words, and proven to be correct. So
So you think she and SAR are w/w?
The same way I always have. By doing VCA and reading posts. It's a baseline WW skill everyone should have otherwise they're left begging for a PR every game to understand anything. In fact, I've started teaching Suni to use this strategy instead since it's better for her playstyle.
That is incorrect. Otherwise, every vote would be RNG'd the first cycle if there were nothing to glean about VCA (when, where, and why someone votes where they do). Early and often votes provides this. Joke votes do not.
