Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
*copies down Pippy lylo tell in WW files*
Not by a long shot given it was almost open the entire cycle.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
End of September Speed Game
Started by Animal Midwife
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
… what about by page length?
That's probably impossible to measure given that I think this is the only 3-player speed game on SDN.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Lol ok. I have no motivation to lie about that because we are currently not playing a game.
Feel like I'm living in that logic puzzle that is like "if Timmy always lies, and Jane always tells the truth... "
Cause if I know the one constant is that you'll always want to kill me, then that game would have ended up with the exact same outcome if I was a wolf who tried to lie 🙄
My point exactly
...so your point is just that I lie all the time even outside of games?
Sure, I would play again!
Okay, so that's 2/3... @SARdoghandler have you decompressed yet?
My boyfriend is back home again and we're trip planning so my heart might not be able to take another round right now
Hm, okay. Anyone else down like snooping @Lawper or @Dr. ForgotToFlush ?
No my point is you always lie in game even if you're playing for the village (although that was a chaos role)
cant im taking a bathroom break
rip i'm gridlocked
It's ok one round was good. I'm sure there will be another game soon.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Welp. You have evidence that I did not lie in this game, so I guess I give up.
I suppose I should amend my statement to say that you can lie in any game you damn well please. And to just take your word for whatever you're trying to prove goes against the whole spirit of the game so I don't understand why you think I should believe you because "you've never lied about getting a mechanistic win"? That's all, I'm not trying to fight dude, just trying to get you to understand where I'm coming from
I didn't say "never." I will probably continue to have a hard time understanding where you're coming from when the implication is that I'm inherently untrustworthy, because I happen to disagree with that assessment and find it somewhat tiresome.
