Fire Emblem: Three HoWWses Game Thread

[WildZoo]

---

Members don't see this ad.

everyone had two lives

Oh I love that kind of setup hehe

 

[Wiisp]

Sure, there could be factionless people to muddy the waters, but it still feels like a lot of clearing going on?

Unless you're getting at something else.

my statement wasnt meant to discredit yours, I still agree that randomized wolves is easier to balance then having canon wolves, when certain people in the houses know all the members

 

[alleycat03]

Hey I’m alive

Sorry for ghosting the past few days.
I’ve been traveling and I start school tomorrow so WW has not been a top priority

If someone could give a tldr that would be great

 

[Zenge142]

Screw it. He’s been super twisty in the way he’s presented my posts.

Yeet Lawpy

 

[WildZoo]

Hey I’m alive

Sorry for ghosting the past few days.
I’ve been traveling and I start school tomorrow so WW has not been a top priority

If someone could give a tldr that would be great

I uh

....

Guys is a tl;dr even possible right now?

 

[chicandtoughness]

very confused by this. i thought you said the answer to april's question was that wolves are in their own separate faction

At this point we should just ignore the info that AM got. Of course wolves are their own faction. That's how they win WW games.

Right now folks are making the mistake that flavor = faction and I've been cautioning against that since Day 1.

YES we can assume wolves win on their own (the definition of a faction).

NO we cannot assume that we are split into factions corresponding with flavor, e.g. the Black Eagles all win together, the Blue Lions all win together, the Golden Deer all win together, and the Ashen Wolves all win together.

Is it POSSIBLE? Of course.
Can we confirm it and play our game based on it? No.

You could have 5 folks all with Ashen Wolf flavor PMs, but 3 of those could be village, 1 could be a wolf, and 1 could be 3p.

So until we get more info that clarifies the setup, I'm just going to treat the answer that AM got as trash and proceed with wolfhunting as per usual.

 

[samac]

Oh I love that kind of setup hehe

No
that was a nightmare as a wolf lol

 

[samac]

Screw it. He’s been super twisty in the way he’s presented my posts.

Yeet Lawpy

Do you have a big reason for the fluff stuff

 

[WildZoo]

No
that was a nightmare as a wolf lol

Okay but wolves have won BOTH times I've run games like that so?!?!

 

[justafluff]

I uh

....

Guys is a tl;dr even possible right now?

I know! I tried to answer but then I was like… where do I start?

 

[Lawpy]

Because I’ve spent most of the day pouting that I don’t get to vote who I want to vote for and feel worst about.

I have found PSV Wolfy. But I don’t trust myself on PSV.

Nate has pinged me, but I’m paranoid now that Fluff wants us to vote for Nate and it’s all a set up.

I’m also mulling Lawpy. I didn’t care for Zuri, and Lawpy has repeatedly been twisty in his responses to me.

“Repeatedly”

You’ve been pretty unclear and inconsistent in your stance that made it difficult for several people outside of me to understand, with at least one agreeing they read the same way as i did in an earlier post. You also inaccurately used the term antispew earlier that gave a misleading picture on your overall fluffy and nates arguments.

But i frankly don’t care much if you’re sussing me because you fell deep into my wolfreads pretty early on in D2 and now it’s only clearer you’re looking for something to target your focus on.

 

[Zenge142]

Do you have a big reason for the fluff stuff

Yes

 

[samac]

Yes

unyeet april
yeet fluff

 

[holdthemayo]

Screw it. He’s been super twisty in the way he’s presented my posts.

Yeet Lawpy

I feel like...


this might not be the best defense for tonight?


Even if you are sus of Lawpy, self prez or make a real case against him?

 

[samac]

Because it seemed interesting to me. Also I need to better evaluate samac's slot since she subbed in and I did already have a few village points for Nate so he didn't go down my list as far

Edit: also the timing of his vote felt more wolfy to me, followed by samac

Wut

 

[holdthemayo]

Yes

Or make a vote to back up your case

Also make the case

 

[NateTheLesser]

Self prez time

Unyeet April
Yeet Zenge

Also haven't liked his approach to fluff.

 

[holdthemayo]

unyeet april
yeet fluff

Why?

 

[Lawpy]

Screw it. He’s been super twisty in the way he’s presented my posts.

Yeet Lawpy

And there it is

 

[holdthemayo]

Self prez time

Unyeet April
Yeet Zenge

Also haven't liked his approach to fluff.

Go ninja, go ninja, go ninja, go

 

[Wondalfy]

unyeet april
yeet fluff

This is the most confusing interaction I've seen all game

 

[holdthemayo]

And there it is

Thoughts?

 

[NateTheLesser]

Yes

(Like more than you just think she's been inconsistent? That was the impression I was getting)

 

[Zenge142]

“Repeatedly”

I said she hadn’t posted enough yet for me to feel comfortable committing to a read on her.

This is like a clickbait headline version of what I actually said.

This is so twisty I don’t even know where to begin.

Yes Lawper. Twice at least. That’s repeatedly that you’ve twisted my words to make it seem like I said things I didn’t say.

 

[WildZoo]

unyeet april
yeet fluff

I guess this answers my question about your fluff read?

 

[alleycat03]

Oh apparently genny didn’t die and now Mayo and Samac are playing

Cool, cool

I’m just going to vibe and try to figure out why the leading yeet contenders are wolfy

 

[SportPonies]

because u go about it in such a trash way, its no wonder people cant ****ing understand u

Stop it

I kindly ask that y’all try to maintain a level of civility. If you cannot, I will be most vexed.

I see that my mom and grandma beat me to the bonking this time

 

[Wiisp]

Oh apparently genny didn’t die and now Mayo and Samac are playing

Cool, cool

I’m just going to vibe and try to figure out why the leading yeet contenders are wolfy

jesus how behind are u

 

[chicandtoughness]

I mentioned 99% certain with the info I have from you. I'm not a wolf, so Nate isn't either. That's your hard vouch.

Hard soft whatever. I really don't think Nate's a wolf.

Maybe I'm just overconfident. But I'm not wolf-reading Nate either way and the arguments against him have felt silly.

Your first statement implies that you know Nate's affiliation and can hard clear him.
And then you move into a more waffley statement that you "don't think" they're a wolf and are "not wolf-reading" him.
So what is it? Can you hard clear him or are you just going off your gut?

Is there like a mechanical prohibition for you voting me? I really don’t get it!

I believe Zenge has a read on what your role setup is (specifically, the you/SAR setup), and due to the mechanics of your role it is not beneficial to be yeeting you right now. For the record, Wiisp also believes they know what you are/know the setup too.

To summarize for my own stressed out mind:

- SAR is soft vouching for fluff
- fluff is vouching for Nate
- fluff does not have info on SAR but is willing to vouch for her too?
- Nate has info on fluff and would rather she not die
- Zenge and Wiisp have a read on fluff's role
- I thought I had a read on fluff's role but given some of the new info I am no longer confident

 

[Zenge142]

unyeet april
yeet fluff

No. It’s not going to yield the preferred outcome.

 

[Clem J]

Can you clarify this please?

Yes

Their reaction

It was scummy

Which makes them probably scum

You're welcome

 

[WildZoo]

Oh apparently genny didn’t die and now Mayo and Samac are playing

Cool, cool

I’m just going to vibe and try to figure out why the leading yeet contenders are wolfy

genny didn't die
Vissy was killed
Lawpy, samac, and mayo subbed in
Everything else is confusion

 

[holdthemayo]

jesus how behind are u

Imagine me being the most caught up

 

[Clem J]

@Clem J and @SARdoghandler

Any thoughts on the current wagons?

Arguments for your off wagon votes?

Idk what they are

My argument is they're probably mafia

 

[genny]

Oh apparently genny didn’t die and now Mayo and Samac are playing

Cool, cool

I’m just going to vibe and try to figure out why the leading yeet contenders are wolfy

i'd answer you, but i don't know that i can, really

 

[samac]

I guess this answers my question about your fluff read?

I responded to you with a few questions but no one answered

 

[holdthemayo]

Yes

Their reaction

It was scummy

Which makes them probably scum

You're welcome

What does the rest of the pack think?

Or do you just genuinely not give a ****?

 

[Aprilthearab]

did this happen? It would help

Nope

 

[Lawpy]

Yes Lawper. Twice at least. That’s repeatedly that you’ve twisted my words to make it seem like I said things I didn’t say.

You realize in the one post you quoted, samacs herself agreed with my interpretation of the events.

Like even by your own admission, you’ve been using terms like antispew wrong, and that clouds the picture in what you’re trying to say

You can’t accuse me of being twisty when you yourself are being unclear from the start

 

[WildZoo]

I responded to you with a few questions but no one answered

Oh
I keep missing posts

 

[alleycat03]

Oh apparently genny didn’t die and now Mayo and Samac are playing

Cool, cool

I’m just going to vibe and try to figure out why the leading yeet contenders are wolfy

And Lawpy too??

I’ll keep my catch-up thoughts for after yeet close so I don’t contribute to thread bloat.

jesus how behind are u

40 pages give or take

 

[Clem J]

What does the rest of the pack think?

Or do you just genuinely not give a ****?

I don't understand the question

I know wisp and I think his reaction was scummy, its not that complicated lol

 

[NateTheLesser]

(This is what I have for a tally btw:

Nate 5 (AM, miranda, Veggie, genny, Wisp) Zenge 5 (Lawpy, Poppy, mothy, mayo, Nate) PSV 4 (Dubz, fluff, Wondalfy, SAR) Poppy 3 (April, SOV, chic) April 1 (Santy) fluff 1 (samac) Wisp 1 (Clem) Santy 1 (PSV) Lawpy 1 (Zenge)
)

 

[Wiisp]

clem plz lol

 

[samac]

You realize in the one post you quoted, samacs herself agreed with my interpretation of the events.

Like even by your own admission, you’ve been using terms like antispew wrong, and that clouds the picture in what you’re trying to say

You can’t accuse me of being twisty when you yourself are being unclear from the start

I don’t think you’re a wolf at this point tbh

 

[Aprilthearab]

(This is what I have for a tally btw:

Nate 5 (AM, miranda, Veggie, genny, Wisp) Zenge 5 (Lawpy, Poppy, mothy, mayo, Nate) PSV 4 (Dubz, fluff, Wondalfy, SAR) Poppy 3 (April, SOV, chic) April 1 (Santy) fluff 1 (samac) Wisp 1 (Clem) Santy 1 (PSV) Lawpy 1 (Zenge)
)

I'm sorry you have to tally your own possible death but I appreciate it

 

[Wiisp]

yeet PSV
just gunna follow mother Dubz at this point

@kaydubs

 

[alleycat03]

###yeet PSV###

3 way tie

 

[Clem J]

Oh
I keep missing posts

Same

 

[WildZoo]

Trying to catch up and understand
looks like fluff is hard clearing Nate
and sar us somewhat clearing fluff but that hasn’t been defined.
im unsure how Sar could somewhat clear fluff In this situation.

and didn’t fluff claim to know everyone in her faction earlier? Or am I misremembering

Fluff...said she was hard clearing Nate but I think it's been determined that might not be valid
SAR is gently vouching for fluff or at least saying that we shouldn't kill her (yet?) but has said it doesn't exactly have to do with affiliation

Fluff said she knows everyone in her faction, yes