Go (WW) Plus Ultra - My Hero Academia Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I guess I don't know what to make of the chaos/genny thing. I was curious why chaos voted for me too so quick, but wasn't going to question the vote because I want to be mayor lol.

Him withholding info from genny didn't strike me as wolfy because I don't really see a wolfy motive behind it.
 
Also there is no Tenya Ida on the roster, so I gathered without googling this is a flavor reference.

That would be fine, but the homework comment was taking it too far imo.

But sure, pull a Pippy, April. Happy to have wolves come at me and "read" me wolfy for BS reasons. I invite it. I live for it.
The homework comment was taking it too far? Joking that people could read up on the theme? 😆

But I'm enjoying the pushback after I specifically said I'm not even reading you yet, just taking note.
 
I guess I don't know what to make of the chaos/genny thing. I was curious why chaos voted for me too so quick, but wasn't going to question the vote because I want to be mayor lol.

Him withholding info from genny didn't strike me as wolfy because I don't really see a wolfy motive behind it.
I could see the exchange as w/w. Could also see it as w/v on either side. Wolves have to like, say stuff, yanno, and appear to care about replies. Could fit in that category for either of them.
 
>imagine being so against my existence that an independent read, which says nothing about sheeping me, threatens you
I have no problem with your existence, but goats and other games left deep scars

what concerns me more about that post is the level of confidence about any players alignment so early in game, which always makes me uncomfy.
 
for whatever reason I'm good at reading AM and almost always get her alignment right

if you don't listen to anything else I say this game, listen to me on this. AM is very probably a villager
I won't forget similar words coming from Genny moments before AM and the rest of her pack won
 
I have no problem with your existence, but goats and other games left deep scars

what concerns me more about that post is the level of confidence about any players alignment so early in game, which always makes me uncomfy.
go to MU. read ANY game I've played with AM and you'll see that I just have a good read on her.

idk why specifically AM, but I can read her well.
 
I have no problem with your existence, but goats and other games left deep scars

what concerns me more about that post is the level of confidence about any players alignment so early in game, which always makes me uncomfy.
I appreciate that Goats has now become "multiple games" and that we gloss over how you misread me every game before and after that (even if I exclude your wolf rand). Y'all need to get closure before I start calling ya Tunnel Tele.

You will eventually learn that confidence is a good thing (especially early game) when you have evidence to back it up. Hedging helps wolves, confidence helps village.
 
I appreciate that Goats has now become "multiple games" and that we gloss over how you misread me every game before and after that (even if I exclude your wolf rand). Y'all need to get closure before I start calling ya Tunnel Tele.

You will eventually learn that confidence is a good thing (especially early game) when you have evidence to back it up. Hedging helps wolves, confidence helps village.
I am not wolf reading you right now
 
I can confirm that on MU dy has a reputation for a solid enough reading card on AM that when we were wolfing together as hydras, she was compelled to bus AM and me into the ground 😉

But @dyachei most of these players don't know that or know you so I don't find taking a critical eye to your read all that surprising. People get jumpy about AM. And she (and genny) just swept in the last game.
 
Fair, but for Bread specifically I see it as NAI
Fair enough, and I didn't say anything about that. Just that those sorts of jokey flavor related comments always make me a little unsettled. That's not the same as not following. And this flavor of humorlessness about comments that are flavor related and may or may not be actually game-mechanics related, is common for me.

It's a bit compensatory because I often don't pick up on softs and such. My attempts to watch for game related TMI and the like often leads me to take issue with players like Mayo and Bread who Crack flavor related jokes.
 
I can confirm that on MU dy has a reputation for a solid enough reading card on AM that when we were wolfing together as hydras, she was compelled to bus AM and me into the ground 😉

But @dyachei most of these players don't know that or know you so I don't find taking a critical eye to your read all that surprising. People get jumpy about AM. And she (and genny) just swept in the last game.
I don't expect people to know that. I also don't expect several people to jump down my throat about reading someone early. ffs, you guys are making posts that are alignment indicative at this point. Having reads is not unheard of

and instead of telling me you're going to disregard everything I said, you could have said I'll take it with a grain of salt. Instead it was complete denial

It's like no one wants to think about the reasoning for reads anymore, they just jump to the most paranoid
 
I can confirm that on MU dy has a reputation for a solid enough reading card on AM that when we were wolfing together as hydras, she was compelled to bus AM and me into the ground 😉

But @dyachei most of these players don't know that or know you so I don't find taking a critical eye to your read all that surprising. People get jumpy about AM. And she (and genny) just swept in the last game.
She shouldn't be surprised, because having a reading card for AM in no way would would be AI for someone who is wolfing. It's NAI at best if someone has a reading card and also happens to read an actual villager as villager.
 
She shouldn't be surprised, because having a reading card for AM in no way would would be AI for someone who is wolfing. It's NAI at best if someone has a reading card and also happens to read an actual villager as villager.
True reading cards are always or nearly always (read >95%) AI for the person the read is being directed at. It's why I get stiff about Lawpy and specific kills.
 
She shouldn't be surprised, because having a reading card for AM in no way would would be AI for someone who is wolfing. It's NAI at best if someone has a reading card and also happens to read an actual villager as villager.
it has to do with AM's tone and syntax. I don't want to say more than that because AM hasn't figured it out yet, but I can reliably read her
 
Curious on theory if any of the self voters have history or just want to give honest assessment of yourself if you would go for a position as a wolf, be that regular red or unseerable.

I am pretty random in my choices as a wolf, so I am sure I have gone for it at some point just for the fun of it. hehe
 
I don't expect people to know that. I also don't expect several people to jump down my throat about reading someone early. ffs, you guys are making posts that are alignment indicative at this point. Having reads is not unheard of

and instead of telling me you're going to disregard everything I said, you could have said I'll take it with a grain of salt. Instead it was complete denial

It's like no one wants to think about the reasoning for reads anymore, they just jump to the most paranoid
What I meant is I think it was more about how people feel about AM than how people feel about your alignment (perhaps with the exception of cray) for having the read. Like if you had an early read on someone else there might have been less skepticism. But AM triggers people :laugh:
 
True reading cards are always or nearly always (read >95%) AI for the person the read is being directed at. It's why I get stiff about Lawpy and specific kills.
I meant the person doing the reading. If I can usually correctly read you as village when you are village and I am village, that's great. But if I'm wolf, my correct read of you as a villager when you are village, means a lot less for figuring out my own aff in this example, yes? Reading card holding status is much more useful when you have some sense of the person doing readings aff. Without that, it could just be a wolf protecting a packmate with a village read, or a wolf maintaining meta by village reading a villager they hold a card for.

Can you explain the Lawpy example more specifically? I don't follow.
 
What I meant is I think it was more about how people feel about AM than how people feel about your alignment (perhaps with the exception of cray) for having the read. Like if you had an early read on someone else there might have been less skepticism. But AM triggers people :laugh:
I did have early reads on others but not articulatable reads - gut reads are like that.

but AM i can read pretty well. I didn't realize she was so divisive here
 
Curious on theory if any of the self voters have history or just want to give honest assessment of yourself if you would go for a position as a wolf, be that regular red or unseerable.

I am pretty random in my choices as a wolf, so I am sure I have gone for it at some point just for the fun of it. hehe
I'd do it for the lulz

Samac may very well have painted herself into a corner where she might feel like it would look odd for her not to go for a mayor role. I'm not sure on the others, would need someone with a better memory to say whether any of them have done it in the past.
 
See??? Still 4 pages. I guess kaydubs tagged me in both threads and I responded to the wrong one... anyway... heres what i said:

Why are there 4 pages already???? I just had a 25 surgery day. So Ima pour a drink and

promote Dina

and come read past page 1 later.

ETA: Thanks for the heads up @supershorty
 
it has to do with AM's tone and syntax. I don't want to say more than that because AM hasn't figured it out yet, but I can reliably read her
I believe you, because sometimes I can read her. Sometimes. And usually too late, but yeah.

The issue is your read can only be trusted if I trust you. Or if my own read of her agrees (which would give me a consensus on her, but still doesnt tell me your Aff)
 
I don't expect people to know that. I also don't expect several people to jump down my throat about reading someone early. ffs, you guys are making posts that are alignment indicative at this point. Having reads is not unheard of

and instead of telling me you're going to disregard everything I said, you could have said I'll take it with a grain of salt. Instead it was complete denial

It's like no one wants to think about the reasoning for reads anymore, they just jump to the most paranoid

I may owe an apology here - my delivery was probably harsher than my intent. I meant to convey that I didn't like that specific post, but not that I would ignore everything you have to say in the future. I appreciate the context provided by you and others which makes me feel a little better, though I still reserve my grain of salt
 
I meant the person doing the reading. If I can usually correctly read you as village when you are village and I am village, that's great. But if I'm wolf, my correct read of you as a villager when you are village, means a lot less for figuring out my own aff in this example, yes? Reading card holding status is much more useful when you have some sense of the person doing readings aff. Without that, it could just be a wolf protecting a packmate with a village read, or a wolf maintaining meta by village reading a villager they hold a card for.

Can you explain the Lawpy example more specifically? I don't follow.
Yes, I suppose that's what I'm trying to explain to others. So in the end, you do get a useful data point to narrow the POE and it shouldn't be wholly discarded.

My read on Lawpy (when he's playing) is fairly equivalent to dy's read on me. Which is still very strange to me, but that's just how it is, I guess.
 
I believe you, because sometimes I can read her. Sometimes. And usually too late, but yeah.

The issue is your read can only be trusted if I trust you. Or if my own read of her agrees (which would give me a consensus on her, but still doesnt tell me your Aff)
I have reason to tell the truth about this as both alignments. you can still choose not to trust me if you want, but that's on you
 
I have reason to tell the truth about this as both alignments. you can still choose not to trust me if you want, but that's on you
Yup! I remember being taught that very important lesson by you in some game when I first started playing because someone you said was village was village and I thought, I can trust this person! Oh naive Lupin. haha
 
The way Dubz helped to smooth that out is giving me town vibes. I find she is much less helpful at creating understanding and peace as she is at actively or passively causing more dissension when she wolfs.

I am also leaning townish for similar reason on AM.
 
Yup! I remember being taught that very important lesson by you in some game when I first started playing because someone you said was village was village and I thought, I can trust this person! Oh naive Lupin. haha
Arrow maybe? Damn, that's gonna bug me now.
 
I'd do it for the lulz

Samac may very well have painted herself into a corner where she might feel like it would look odd for her not to go for a mayor role. I'm not sure on the others, would need someone with a better memory to say whether any of them have done it in the past.
Did you self vote? I need to copy the tally to this page.

ETA: Oh, yes you did then you voted me. My memory is suffering currently. obviously. lol
 
Bread already giving me a headache confusing me
Was saying people need to watch it to understand my joke vote
Fair enough, and I didn't say anything about that. Just that those sorts of jokey flavor related comments always make me a little unsettled. That's not the same as not following. And this flavor of humorlessness about comments that are flavor related and may or may not be actually game-mechanics related, is common for me.

It's a bit compensatory because I often don't pick up on softs and such. My attempts to watch for game related TMI and the like often leads me to take issue with players like Mayo and Bread who Crack flavor related jokes.
I have a lame sense of humor so I could not skip that one.

Side note to keep me accountable: i should really start taking notes in on some scratch paper since I mostly play on mobile or I jump between 2 computers
 
Top