- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 40,061
- Reaction score
- 30,486
Oh. And whoever moved me? Move me back. Please
I am requesting the same. Please and thanks. 🙂
Oh. And whoever moved me? Move me back. Please
I don't think it works like that 😛Lynch rocky, lynch rocky, lynch rocky
you're the mod. you decide how it works (or doesn't)I don't think it works like that 😛
i have this funny feeling I will be their choiceIt would be kind of hilarious if DocE were hoisted by his own petard on this one, but I don't think he's a wolf, so don't do that 🤣
Okay well since the rocky thing is solidified via plurality, can we maybe address this from the write up? Can someone in a gang explain to me how/when you recruit people? If it happens during the day, and one gang recruited someone Day 3, I think if we extrapolate from this that they recruited a wolf (since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang).In addition, our first interesting wiretap can now be listened to.
(as of Day 3) 2 or 3 gangs were wolf free
I'm kind of confused...how are you getting that a gang went from wolf free to not?Okay well since the rocky thing is solidified via plurality, can we maybe address this from the write up? Can someone in a gang explain to me how/when you recruit people? If it happens during the day, and one gang recruited someone Day 3, I think if we extrapolate from this that they recruited a wolf (since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang).
If that's not how it works, then anyone else have any theories about this?
I think that she is saying that if 2-3 of the gang is truely wolf-free from the write-up this morning, and then they will only be infiltrated if they "recruit" wolves. That's what I took from it anyways.I'm kind of confused...how are you getting that a gang went from wolf free to not?i
Speaking of that write-up, does anyone know how if there is any truth to the statement of whoever said that 2-3 gangs were wolf-free or is it one of those "could be true could be false info" things?Okay well since the rocky thing is solidified via plurality, can we maybe address this from the write up? Can someone in a gang explain to me how/when you recruit people? If it happens during the day, and one gang recruited someone Day 3, I think if we extrapolate from this that they recruited a wolf (since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang).
If that's not how it works, then anyone else have any theories about this?
I thought she was saying that a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang over the course of day 3 ("since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang"), and I'm just confused about how she got that from the statement that 2 or 3 gangs are wolf free. Maybe I'm missing something?Oh geez I completely missed the lynch sorry everyone.
I think that she is saying that if 2-3 of the gang is truely wolf-free from the write-up this morning, and then they will only be infiltrated if they "recruit" wolves. That's what I took from it anyways.
it hit a majority vote so it closed earlyLynch closed already? I thought it was at 8:30.
it hit a majority vote so it closed early
3. Plurality rules are in effect. If more then half of the people vote for you, you will be lynched. This means that when you cast a vote, think about your vote, think about whether or not you actually want that person to be lynched before they can give a rebuttle. Because they will be lynched automatically if plurality is hit. Note that the SoV rule DOES NOT APPLY for plurality
no. As trilt quoted, he specifically spelled out that you won't with plurality rulesWill I be penalized for not voting in time?
Ohh okay. Maybe she's just speculating that's one of the ways how those "wolf-free" gangs get wolves in them in general? Unless I'm missing something too haha.I thought she was saying that a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang over the course of day 3 ("since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang"), and I'm just confused about how she got that from the statement that 2 or 3 gangs are wolf free. Maybe I'm missing something?![]()
That's how I interpreted KC, too, and I don't understand where that came from. I'm pretty sure the person is just saying either 2 or 3 groups were wolf free, not that one transitioned.I thought she was saying that a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang over the course of day 3 ("since it was either 2 or 3 gangs wolf free at that point, so a wolf-free gang went to a wolf-containing gang"), and I'm just confused about how she got that from the statement that 2 or 3 gangs are wolf free. Maybe I'm missing something?![]()
This law is officially bunk 😛Swear I haven't abandoned you, hopefully will have an answer soon, still no answer from rocky....
she was just on...Swear I haven't abandoned you, hopefully will have an answer soon, still no answer from rocky....
I feel like that's a stretch. Granted i don't know how recruitment works. But that "2 or 3" seems more like inherent vagueness in the mechanics of the info that person received, than an indication of a transition.So, I interpreted it "2 or 3" to mean that at the time specified (Day 3) there was a transition happening that made it difficult to state definitively the exact number of wolf-free gangs. Again, a lot of assumptions being made here, but if that is when recruiting for gangs happens (during the day) and if a then-wolf-free gang recruited someone that day (day 3) then it would make sense that they recruited a wolf, yielding this information (that as of day 3 there were either 2 or 3 gangs that were wolf free).
If I'm not explaining things clearly let me know, this is just how my brain is interpreting and since I don't know how the recruitment works or anything (not being in a gang) I figured this could be a good way to nail a wolf if my thinking is correct.
That's fair. I may be grasping at straws here, but it would be nice to know how recruitment works.I feel like that's a stretch. Granted i don't know how recruitment works. But that "2 or 3" seems more like inherent vagueness in the mechanics of the info that person received, than an indication of a transition.
That is assuming that at one point there were 3 gangs that were wolf free.From the write ups we know the largest/ Spanish gang has at least 1 wolf. This means that either they have all the wolves or they have some or one and the rest of the wolves would be our unaffiliated.
Anybody want to take bets as to which way it goes?
That's what I thought tooI thought Kam voted for caiter?
Did Kam not waffle. Damn let me yell at Rocky, I took her word...I thought Kam voted for caiter?
Just checked. Kam did not.Did Kam not waffle. Damn let me yell at Rocky, I took her word...
No one gets penalized on plurality days!Does jt at least count for the purposes of me not adding another auto-vote to myself for tomorrow? 🙂
Sent from my iPad using SDN mobile
Lol. Rocky, you are not having a good game. I hope everything is getting better IRL, whatever it is.
No one gets penalized on plurality days!