Magical WW Signups and Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
This role is very important and you're doing the wolves a HUGE favor!
 
villager Elf, we work with nature, please refrain from suddenly jumping back on us as you will regret it. I think right now PBC is still in the lead, we're 2 votes behind, and AM is a vote or two behind that.
 
This role is very important and you're doing the wolves a HUGE favor!

Why did you not defend yourself before now? Why did you not defend your actions? Why is the only thing you've given us a role name and an unverifiable claim that you a super important? If in fact you are important, why did you not think it would be better to defend yourself using something else rather than painting a target on yourself?

Do you know I don't think you're in the lead anyways based on what zooters said but I still have all these questions?
 
I asked who you thought was wolfy and why, and you thought that was in jest? Why?

Because it was in response to me having so much time and energy. I used that as a kind of defense against being lynched, you replied and expected me to give you wolf suspects day one with significant reasoning. It seemed like the sort of comment that would be made in jest, in response to a defense that was also made in the same spirit. I'm sorry if I misunderstood you.
 
I'm the Mage. You really don't want to lynch me.

Well I'm Little Red Riding Hood, except I forgot to leave a trail back from my Grandma's house and now I'm stumbling around in a forest looking very confused. 😛
 
Because it was in response to me having so much time and energy. I used that as a kind of defense against being lynched, you replied and expected me to give you wolf suspects day one with significant reasoning. It seemed like the sort of comment that would be made in jest, in response to a defense that was also made in the same spirit. I'm sorry if I misunderstood you.

Fair 'nuff. No, I was being serious - if you had time/energy, then I wanted to know what your reads on people were. Both for consideration on my own part, and to have something to ask you about a day or two down the road.
 
This role is very important and you're doing the wolves a HUGE favor!

In a game of magic, I'm the mage and see all kinds of things!!!

Ooh, wait, this is strategy, right? Role reveal a role that may or not be accurate so that people think twice about lynching you until they've had a chance to suss things out for a bit longer? Cool, I like it. 🙂
 
Ooh, wait, this is strategy, right? Role reveal a role that may or not be accurate so that people think twice about lynching you until they've had a chance to suss things out for a bit longer? Cool, I like it. 🙂

This started to sound like trying too hard about 5 posts ago.
 
Ooh, wait, this is strategy, right? Role reveal a role that may or not be accurate so that people think twice about lynching you until they've had a chance to suss things out for a bit longer? Cool, I like it. 🙂
I will say that that strategy works best when it's not 10 minutes to lynch deadline, lol.
 
Well, it's pretty clear to me that I'm not wanted in this game. I've been PMing with kaydubs and am not going to pay any more attention tonight and will consider in the morning if I want to keep playing.
I don't know where this idea of not being wanted is coming from, but I wanted to say that you played great as a wolf in the last game. Hope you feel better in the morning.
 
FINAL LYNCH TALLY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (7) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, vmh, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
25/25
 
Last edited:
FINAL LYNCH TALY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (7) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, vmh, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
25/25
oh crap. you have vmh on there twice.
 
UPDATED FINAL LYNCH TALLY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (6) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
24/25
 
This started to sound like trying too hard about 5 posts ago.

Sorry, I'll try to go with the flow more. :shy: Hey at least I'm enthusiastically trying to be involved in the game, that's how I learnt how to play table top RPG, by starting off as the world's most annoying newbie and asking an incessant amount of questions and attempting to jump 5 paces ahead of myself. 🙂

I will say that that strategy works best when it's not 10 minutes to lynch deadline, lol.

Yes, that is a good point.
 
UPDATED FINAL LYNCH TALLY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (6) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
24/25
My vote is correct now, but you should update Crayola's lynch count to 2. I mean, it doesn't matter because she's not in the lead, but I'm all about annoying details like that 😉
 
UPDATED FINAL LYNCH TALLY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (6) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
24/25
You still have my vote for nyanko on there. Missed that the first time.
Who didn't vote?
 
UPDATED FINAL LYNCH TALLY, CHECK YOUR VOTES
Hay (0)
-
BBC (1) - nyanko
STL (0) -
nyanko (1) - genny
kam (1) - jilary
PBC (6) - STL, Hayley, Trilt, Gwen, AM, wz/caiter
AM (6) - MJ, Kam, finn, genny, LIS, PBC
Finn (3) - BBC, DVMD, mq
WZ (4) - LoTF, raf, dy, FFM
Crayola (1) - ally, vmh
dy(1) - ceke
24/25
***************************************************
:heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah::heckyeah:
*********************************************
 
Let's resume our story. Today, birds did not sing. Magical folk did not clitter-clatter. However, there was still no silence, no rest. They knew evil had taken root in some of them. The good folk thought they knew who to trust, and the evil ones hid well. Magical beings turned on one and other. Darkness was fast approaching, and we all know what happens when the sun sets. As names were tossed about during the town meetings, all logic was thrown out the window. They couldn't bear to lose anyone else, but two names were eventually called out. Two? Two? How could they kill two of their own residence? They... couldn't do it. The score was settled. Today, no one will die. But tonight... They knew tonight would be a different story.

No one has died.

Please get in night actions as soon as possible. You have until 8 am CST.

Current Roster:

Magical Forest
1. Jilary
2. Flim Flam Man
3. Mad Jack
4. Kam325
5. Trilt

Shimmering Lake
6. allyphoe
7. finnickthedog
8. BeautifulBritishColumbia
9. PrincessButterCup
10. LadyOtheFarm

Top of the Beanstalk
11. SummerTheLynx
12. heyyimhayley
13. Gwenevre
14. Caiter92/WildZoo
15. morninqlory

Fairytale Fields
16. DVMDream
17. LetItSnow
18. dyachei
19. Crayola227
20. nyanko

Valley of Death
21. vetmedhead
22. Ceke2002
23. genny
24. Animal Midwife
25. raf2769
 
********************************
that was no fun for me to watch
*********************************

You mean you didn't enjoy watching me run around like a chook with its head cut off? :laugh:
 
********************************
that was no fun for me to watch
*********************************
*****************************
Abs
Abs I can't tolerate change, pls rectify your username immediately
*****************************
 
Sorry, catching up.
She did do a wolf brag in DRoP when we were wolves together, as some others pointed out. While I can see where you're coming from, I am just not getting as many feels from PBC as I expected to, mostly because when I was a wolf with her in that game she kept all of her enthusiasm in the wolf chat and kept most of it off the thread to avoid suspicion.

Unlynch Peebs.
I actually had forgotten about that wolf brag, so I eat my words there. I still agree that mentioning she'd be wolf bragging x hours out is a bit weird, and I'm still not convinced by her claim even now.
I don't disagree at all, I just think it's stupid. Why bother playing the game? We could all just role reveal at the beginning and whoever has the sketchiest role gets voted. And then some mod will say "haHA! I know! I'll mess with their minds" which has been done a few hundred times now.

It just gets old. People need to play the game the way it was intended - based off of hints, suggestions, tells, and reads. Not "Uhhhhh..... no info, so I'm gonna RNG the game away or force people to role reveal."

I really LIKE that JDH has started prohibiting role reveals.
I agree with you, but I also think that as long as we have roles, they will be leaned upon. Because the reality is that we jump on people for ridiculous things all the time, and if you can dispel the ridiculous things with a good role claim, it would be silly to not. We just talk a lot more before getting to that point. That's why I think a certain amount of "haHA!" is not a bad thing in design.

And even jdh's game allowed roles/abilities to spoken about in PM (although they were not helpful to finding wolves in this past one), so we'd have the same situation where people would simply reveal to a buddy as defense.
That's one of the reasons for asking people to talk about what they're reading and how they're interpreting it. Forcing them to talk more - and commit to how they are interpreting something - builds down the road.

Yeah. Day 1 is always gonna be horse****e. But there's no reason it can't be a foundation for Day 2, Day 3, etc.
Also agreed. And then you get lynched for being "aggressive." :laugh:
 
Last edited:
I dislike that we didn't get any answers at all from this lynch.
And this is a meaningless nothing, so let me elaborate:

I'm still not happy with PBC. Probably tunneling. It's probably nothing. But nothing in that role makes me think of gleeful PBC who loved her "change the role seering of a person" roles and revels in chaos. It still feels wrong to me, and it probably goes without saying that it'd be nice for someone to investigate her.

I genuinely don't think my reasoning on PBC claiming a "villager yada yada" was that bad, and I'm a little perplexed that AM almost got lynched for agreeing (and following) those thoughts. Am I misunderstanding something about that situation?
 
Just means that the first blow is almost guaranteed to be a villager.

Yeah I have noticed that in other games as well. I think the odds of getting a wolf on a first lynch cycle would be extremely low. I'm trying to listen to what others are saying though for future cycles, people have been very helpful with the sorts of things I should be aware of that might hint at wolfiness. Just need to put the mentoring into action. 🙂
 
I agree with you, but I also think that as long as we have roles, they will be leaned upon. Because the reality is that we jump on people for ridiculous things all the time, and if you can dispel the ridiculous things with a good role claim, it would be silly to not. We just talk a lot more before getting to that point. That's why I think a certain amount of "haHA!" is not a bad thing in design.

I didn't say we should never use roles. I'm on board with using all the info, though I hate the quick role reveals. But people in prevet games are like 95% dependent on role info instead of the maybe 15% they should be. Wayyyyy too many people who say "whelp, I don't know anything, so....."
 
And this is a meaningless nothing, so let me elaborate:

I'm still not happy with PBC. Probably tunneling. It's probably nothing. But nothing in that role makes me think of gleeful PBC who loved her "change the role seering of a person" roles and revels in chaos. It still feels wrong to me, and it probably goes without saying that it'd be nice for someone to investigate her.

I genuinely don't think my reasoning on PBC claiming a "villager yada yada" was that bad, and I'm a little perplexed that AM almost got lynched for agreeing (and following) those thoughts. Am I misunderstanding something about that situation?

I could get on board a PBC lynch tomorrow. None of her answers to me were substantive. I just was leery of how that voting seemed to go.
 
I could get on board a PBC lynch tomorrow. None of her answers to me were substantive. I just was leery of how that voting seemed to go.
I think I'd like to look elsewhere tomorrow to keep discussion rolling. But if we get close to lynch close without someone that I feel better about, I'll be back on PBC like white on rice.
 
Me laddies, I may be but a village gowl, but that role description appears a wee bit banjaxed for all of the "excitement". Besides, aren't hobgoblins typically seen as gammy? I know I wouldn't be associating with the likes of 'em
 
Top