- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 34
I'm assuming you didn't hear anything until April?Good luck to you both! I was on the alternate list last year and I can tell you, it was Awful having to wait. Hang in there though!
I'm assuming you didn't hear anything until April?Good luck to you both! I was on the alternate list last year and I can tell you, it was Awful having to wait. Hang in there though!
You've called admissions?
Mine was received late sept and I havent heard a peep until I called and they said it was with vet adcomm. Don't fret yet!yea, I called admissions....all i got was "they have all of my stuff"....my application was turned in in october, GRE scores received, letters of rec received, and nothing, no interview, no denial letter, zero communication.....![]()
just so stressful...im from california, got rejected from UC Davis, trying so hard to stay on the west coast.....not knowing what youre doing in 8 months from now is quite nerve wracking!![]()
Did you also apply to Washington/Oregon?
I also applied to a bunch of schools. Also didn't get Davis. We'll land somewhere. 8 months is still a long time to figure stuff out.yea. I appplied to tons of schools, Oregon and Washington included, a few on the east coast that I liked too
I interviewed in late March, was put on the alternate list right away and was accepted in the middle to end of April.I'm assuming you didn't hear anything until April?
Hey everyone,
I had my interview on Nov 9th and I was told I should have an answer on Nov 24th but I'm getting nervous. Yesterday I received rejection letters from UC Davis and Western (had the interview on Nov 2nd). What are my chances of getting in to Midwestern when I've already been rejected by two other schools? My overall GPA is 3.6, science GPA is 3.5. GRE not so good. 152 verbal, 147 quantitative, and 4 analytical writing. I have 2,200 hours as a vet assistant/tech. My experience is from two small animal clinics and Banfield working with cats, dogs, with a little bit of exotics and wildlife too. Has anyone been accepted with similar scores? I'm really feeling discouraged today because I expected to at least be put on the wait list for Western U.
Hey everyone,
I had my interview on Nov 9th and I was told I should have an answer on Nov 24th but I'm getting nervous. Yesterday I received rejection letters from UC Davis and Western (had the interview on Nov 2nd). What are my chances of getting in to Midwestern when I've already been rejected by two other schools? My overall GPA is 3.6, science GPA is 3.5. GRE not so good. 152 verbal, 147 quantitative, and 4 analytical writing. I have 2,200 hours as a vet assistant/tech. My experience is from two small animal clinics and Banfield working with cats, dogs, with a little bit of exotics and wildlife too. Has anyone been accepted with similar scores? I'm really feeling discouraged today because I expected to at least be put on the wait list for Western U.
I think Midwesterns stats for this year are higher. And last year it was like 3.4 I think? Not exactly sure but it's getting higher each year! 3.6 is a good GPA!
Where did you find new stats? Been looking everywhere trying to figure out why I haven't gotten an interview. I've turned into quite the detective, stalking every college's website![]()
Hey everyone,
I had my interview on Nov 9th and I was told I should have an answer on Nov 24th but I'm getting nervous. Yesterday I received rejection letters from UC Davis and Western (had the interview on Nov 2nd). What are my chances of getting in to Midwestern when I've already been rejected by two other schools? My overall GPA is 3.6, science GPA is 3.5. GRE not so good. 152 verbal, 147 quantitative, and 4 analytical writing. I have 2,200 hours as a vet assistant/tech. My experience is from two small animal clinics and Banfield working with cats, dogs, with a little bit of exotics and wildlife too. Has anyone been accepted with similar scores? I'm really feeling discouraged today because I expected to at least be put on the wait list for Western U.
well, when everyone keeps comparing ONLY GPA and wondering why they haven't gotten in, it doesn't seem like it. It's also not the first and only thing some schools look at. School statistics don't mean that much. If you have a stellar set of eLORs, wonderful experience, and a crappy GPA you may still get in. If you have a 4.0 but have no extra-curriculars or much experience, you may not even get an interview. It all depends on the school. But commenting on how a school could reject someone with a 3.88 is ridiculous. Each school looks at different things. Quite honestly, your comment above comes off as a little rude.I think we're all very aware of how the application process works and although it's not GPA entirely (except some schools), that's the first that all schools are looking at before proceeding with the rest of your application.....hence why everyone keeps mentioning their GPA and comparing it to the schools statistics..... it is also highly recommended by almost all Colleges to compare your stats with the statistics of previous entering classes to see where you may fit in, what to improve, etc etc..again why you see GPA on all threads and why people are comparing themselves
well, when everyone keeps comparing ONLY GPA and wondering why they haven't gotten in, it doesn't seem like it. It's also not the first and only thing some schools look at. School statistics don't mean that much. If you have a stellar set of eLORs, wonderful experience, and a crappy GPA you may still get in. If you have a 4.0 but have no extra-curriculars or much experience, you may not even get an interview. It all depends on the school. But commenting on how a school could reject someone with a 3.88 is ridiculous. Each school looks at different things. Quite honestly, your comment above comes off as a little rude.
Prevets pretty much do it every year. They worry and turn to GPA for answers. While you definitely have every right to discuss it and it isn't an issue per say, those in vet school and who have graduated keep trying to let you guys know that the rest of your application is extremely important as to why some get in and others don't. Schools are trying to put together a class. They try to pick people that will fill in all the areas of vet med and have some connections to make a "family" of sorts. Honestly, I think this is why some prevets are so incredibly saddened when they worked so hard to get that high GPA and GRE, but let the rest of the application fall short of who they are as an actual individual.Well no I'm not trying to be rude, you can read my comment in whatever tone you please. Students aren't given anything but statistics to compare to. We are given GPAs and GREs and told by colleges to compare yourself to gage admission. So that's what we do. We aren't given a standard of extra curricular activities to compare nor are we given resumes of admitted students to compare ourselves. So while everyone says it's ridiculous to compare oneself to a set standard, those stats are there for a reason and again we are told specifically to compare ourselves. We all know what the admissions process is, and GPA is a big part of it. And if us students want to chat about our GPAs and why we think we may or may not have gotten in or if we stress about our future then that's fine. These boards are here for a reason; So applicants can chat about their application process, worries, fears and we're using these boards to do just that. GPA happens to be a big fear of undergrads as it is engrained in our heads to worry worry worry by our concelors. I don't think we should be called ridiculous or have it insinuated that we don't know what the process is just because we are concerned. It's normal to be freaked out and panic when it comes to ones future and if we wish to discuss our concerns with eachother than that should be of no issue.
Prevents pretty much do it every year. They worry and turn to GPA for answers. While you definitely have every right to discuss it and it isn't an issue per say, those in vet school and who have graduated keep trying to let you guys know that the rest of your application is extremely important as to why some get in and others don't. Schools are trying to put together a class. They try to pick people that will fill in all the areas of vet med and have some connections to make a "family" of sorts. Honestly, I think this is why some prevets are so incredibly saddened when they worked so hard to get that high GPA and GRE, but let the rest of the application fall short of who they are as an actual individual.
This is why I am actually quite disheartened to hear that people are being told to only look at number stats to decide where they fit in. That should not be the case. It is what you have done outside of school and your ambitions that will get you that deeper look. Anyway, just wanted to say that as I think I generally make one post trying to get this across to each year's new set of potentials.
Good luck all.
Yes but a difference in GPA that is 0.2 is not a big part of it. having minor variations is going to do nothing in being able to determine if you're going to be accepted or not. Some schools will give you points and how to determine those points, but otherwise trying to figure out you chance of acceptance based on GPA is about as useful as a screendoor on a submarine. You'd probably have better luck blindfolded and throwing darts.We all know what the admissions process is, and GPA is a big part of it.
Yes but a difference in GPA that is 0.2 is not a big part of it. having minor variations is going to do nothing in being able to determine if you're going to be accepted or not. Some schools will give you points and how to determine those points, but otherwise trying to figure out you chance of acceptance based on GPA is about as useful as a screendoor on a submarine. You'd probably have better luck blindfolded and throwing darts.
We keep telling you it really isn't comparable. And you guys keep trying to compare it...
Prevets pretty much do it every year. They worry and turn to GPA for answers. While you definitely have every right to discuss it and it isn't an issue per say, those in vet school and who have graduated keep trying to let you guys know that the rest of your application is extremely important as to why some get in and others don't. Schools are trying to put together a class. They try to pick people that will fill in all the areas of vet med and have some connections to make a "family" of sorts. Honestly, I think this is why some prevets are so incredibly saddened when they worked so hard to get that high GPA and GRE, but let the rest of the application fall short of who they are as an actual individual.
This is why I am actually quite disheartened to hear that people are being told to only look at number stats to decide where they fit in. That should not be the case. It is what you have done outside of school and your ambitions that will get you that deeper look. Anyway, just wanted to say that as I think I generally make one post trying to get this across to each year's new set of potentials.
Good luck all.
THIS.Yes but a difference in GPA that is 0.2 is not a big part of it. having minor variations is going to do nothing in being able to determine if you're going to be accepted or not. Some schools will give you points and how to determine those points, but otherwise trying to figure out you chance of acceptance based on GPA is about as useful as a screendoor on a submarine. You'd probably have better luck blindfolded and throwing darts.
We keep telling you it really isn't comparable. And you guys keep trying to compare it...
(I feel like maybe I'm slightly off topic rambling instead of studying)THIS.
I think it is ok to compare stats to others, however I do not think it's ok to just say things like "I won't get in because my GRE or my GPA isn't high enough". GPAs and GREs are an important part but I know in many cases they aren't a make it or break it. Take it from a person who has been accepted to two vet schools already and has received another interview offer with an average GPA of 3.5 and embarrassing GRE scores (145,145,4). What I believe have saved me is my non-academic background. I used to get very sad, to the point I'd cry because I was under the impression that my scores were definitely going to keep me out of vet school. But then a wise person said something similar to what Lupin21 and dyachei have mentioned. After that, I made it my goal to show these vets schools that I am more than just my "stats". This mindset has definitely kept me going.
(I feel like maybe I'm slightly off topic rambling instead of studying)
I can't spirit fingers this topic enough. An AVERAGE means there are some below and some above. It annoys me when people (and they still do in vet school) obsess over an average number. How much does that actually tell you? Are there any outlier numbers? How big was the number spread? Did one person make a 100 and the next highest was mutliple 80s but a few failures? Did people either get 100 or fail? Don't point a number and harass someone, and don't point at a number and obsess over it. Maybe it's just our competitive nature but it's annoying as all get out when I hear my fellow students or other vet students bicker about numbers.
Anyway. ImAVet, don't stress. All of my numbers were low for majority of vet school "standards." But my experiences, my interviews and everything made me look more "desirable." I'm only in my first year but I catch myself comparing myself to my classmates and get discouraged if the average is higher than my grade. You will be told not to compare yourself but it happens occasionally and it sucks. So, keep on keeping on and your "below average stats" can take a backseat to how actually awesome you really are.
I think we're all very aware of how the application process works and although it's not GPA entirely (except some schools), that's the first that all schools are looking at before proceeding with the rest of your application.....hence why everyone keeps mentioning their GPA and comparing it to the schools statistics..... it is also highly recommended by almost all Colleges to compare your stats with the statistics of previous entering classes to see where you may fit in, what to improve, etc etc..again why you see GPA on all threads and why people are comparing themselves
Well no I'm not trying to be rude, you can read my comment in whatever tone you please. Students aren't given anything but statistics to compare to. We are given GPAs and GREs and told by colleges to compare yourself to gage admission. So that's what we do. We aren't given a standard of extra curricular activities to compare nor are we given resumes of admitted students to compare ourselves. So while everyone says it's ridiculous to compare oneself to a set standard, those stats are there for a reason and again we are told specifically to compare ourselves. We all know what the admissions process is, and GPA is a big part of it. And if us students want to chat about our GPAs and why we think we may or may not have gotten in or if we stress about our future then that's fine. These boards are here for a reason; So applicants can chat about their application process, worries, fears and we're using these boards to do just that. GPA happens to be a big fear of undergrads as it is engrained in our heads to worry worry worry by our concelors. I don't think we should be called ridiculous or have it insinuated that we don't know what the process is just because we are concerned. It's normal to be freaked out and panic when it comes to ones future and if we wish to discuss our concerns with eachother than that should be of no issue.
We're all totally freaked out and looking for comfort, solice, conversation, and/or advice in individuals who are going through the same things as us, and that's totally ok![]()
That's fine. Just don't expect that when you post in a public forum such as this one that other members of the SDN community can't or shouldn't get involved.We're all totally freaked out and looking for comfort, solice, conversation, and/or advice in individuals who are going through the same things as us, and that's totally ok![]()
I don't see that but i could have easily skimmed past that."ridiculous, uninformed, and absurd."
Cemc005 said:Have you heard anything yet from them?? I know you were in the same boat like me, having everything "completed" in Oct.
I understand where everyone is coming from but i don't think some of you are trying to get your point across in the most productive manner. I think we would all be happy to listen to you if your appeasement of our concerns and advice (which I have taken from some) came with a little bit nicer wording instead of telling us we are "ridiculous, uninformed, and absurd." Like I said, we are concerned, and sometimes fears are totally irrational and that's fine but telling us or me or whomever that I'm ridiculous doesn't come across as trying to help. It comes across as trying to shut our fears down and belittle our concerns. Most of you went through the same thing, which is great and puts you in a great spot to support us, but it's not supportive when our concerns are criticized or made fun of. I love when people say "hey you know what it's gonna be ok! Here's what happened to me last year" or "hey you'll be great" (which some of you have done). But support us without criticism of our concerns or fears, irrational or not, and don't belittle how we feel, irrational or not. It's terrifying time for all of us and we are all just trying to figure out our future one step at a time.
Pretty frustrating, I have called and they said everything was in vet med admissions hands at this point, but haven't heard a peep since Oct 1st. I was informed however, that interviews go until April, which I thought was cutting it pretty close to the national deadline
Well no I'm not trying to be rude, you can read my comment in whatever tone you please. Students aren't given anything but statistics to compare to. We are given GPAs and GREs and told by colleges to compare yourself to gage admission. So that's what we do. We aren't given a standard of extra curricular activities to compare nor are we given resumes of admitted students to compare ourselves. So while everyone says it's ridiculous to compare oneself to a set standard, those stats are there for a reason and again we are told specifically to compare ourselves. We all know what the admissions process is, and GPA is a big part of it. And if us students want to chat about our GPAs and why we think we may or may not have gotten in or if we stress about our future then that's fine. These boards are here for a reason; So applicants can chat about their application process, worries, fears and we're using these boards to do just that. GPA happens to be a big fear of undergrads as it is engrained in our heads to worry worry worry by our concelors. I don't think we should be called ridiculous or have it insinuated that we don't know what the process is just because we are concerned. It's normal to be freaked out and panic when it comes to ones future and if we wish to discuss our concerns with eachother than that should be of no issue.
I understand where everyone is coming from but i don't think some of you are trying to get your point across in the most productive manner. I think we would all be happy to listen to you if your appeasement of our concerns and advice (which I have taken from some) came with a little bit nicer wording instead of telling us we are "ridiculous, uninformed, and absurd." Like I said, we are concerned, and sometimes fears are totally irrational and that's fine but telling us or me or whomever that I'm ridiculous doesn't come across as trying to help. It comes across as trying to shut our fears down and belittle our concerns. Most of you went through the same thing, which is great and puts you in a great spot to support us, but it's not supportive when our concerns are criticized or made fun of. I love when people say "hey you know what it's gonna be ok! Here's what happened to me last year" or "hey you'll be great" (which some of you have done). But support us without criticism of our concerns or fears, irrational or not, and don't belittle how we feel, irrational or not. It's terrifying time for all of us and we are all just trying to figure out our future one step at a time.
I understand where everyone is coming from but i don't think some of you are trying to get your point across in the most productive manner. I think we would all be happy to listen to you if your appeasement of our concerns and advice (which I have taken from some) came with a little bit nicer wording instead of telling us we are "ridiculous, uninformed, and absurd." Like I said, we are concerned, and sometimes fears are totally irrational and that's fine but telling us or me or whomever that I'm ridiculous doesn't come across as trying to help. It comes across as trying to shut our fears down and belittle our concerns. Most of you went through the same thing, which is great and puts you in a great spot to support us, but it's not supportive when our concerns are criticized or made fun of. I love when people say "hey you know what it's gonna be ok! Here's what happened to me last year" or "hey you'll be great" (which some of you have done). But support us without criticism of our concerns or fears, irrational or not, and don't belittle how we feel, irrational or not. It's terrifying time for all of us and we are all just trying to figure out our future one step at a time.
The boards are also here so you guys can take advice from people who have actually been through the process. Not just so you can sit around freaking out and whining and huddling together like a passle of scared baby bunnies.
Christ, who pissed in your cornflakes. The world is not here to coddle you and sing you bedtime stories. If you are being ridiculous, we are going to tell you you are being ridiculous. It isn't our job to pat you on the head and tell you everything is going to be ok and keep encouraging this sefl-perpetuating cycle of overreaction.
And for feck's sake, it is not "terrifying" It's veterinary school. It's an application. Do you have any idea how many more truly terrifying things there are going on in the world?
you get to feel however you want to. But come back to these comments in a few months and see the wisdom in what she says.You just proved my point. If I want to be terrified, I'm allowed to be. If we all want to be concerned we are allowed to be. If you want to be supportive, awesome. This is my future and yea, I'm terrified, sorry if you don't approve or don't feel as if my feelings or the conversations on this thread are valid. But you don't need to be sarcastic and rude to get your support across. Thanks.
You just proved my point. If I want to be terrified, I'm allowed to be. If we all want to be concerned we are allowed to be. If you want to be supportive, awesome. This is my future and yea, I'm terrified, sorry if you don't approve or don't feel as if my feelings or the conversations on this thread are valid. But you don't need to be sarcastic and rude to get your support across. Thanks.
you keep saying belittling. I don't think the majority of comments have been belittling. i'm honestly confused as to what you are finding belittling. We are trying to give you advice.trying to belittling how I feel or what I'm thinking
you keep saying belittling. I don't think the majority of comments have been belittling. i'm honestly confused as to what you are finding belittling. We are trying to give you advice.
so how about instead of ganging up on me and telling me how I'm feeling or what I'm thinking is stupid, ridiculous, or the millions other things that have been said, we move on? No one is accomplishing anything by trying to belittling how I feel or what I'm thinking. Really, you're not helping at all.
Good grief people, seriously
In this thread I have been told I am uniformed, being ridiculous, absurd, stupid, over reacting, and too emotionally invested in school. That's not giving me advice. And I'm done with this thread. Have A good day!