This sounds like Schrodinger's Wolf to me.
i'm not seeing enough to make me want to move my vote
Tbh I think the only reason I haven’t felt bad about her yet is because she’s posted more than I’m used to. I’m getting some very early England vibes. I tend to think absent barky is wolfy barky
This is the same definition of tone read I use. Although vibes and tone read kinda get rolled into one mentally for me.
I'm not explaining myself well, but it's more that for you, specifically, I'll often hit a point where your alignment becomes clear and everything you've said makes sense in the context of that alignment.
What have I been misinterpreting?
I’m getting caught up now and have posted my thoughts so far. Anything you’re wanting me to elaborate on?
It’s still D1, so the fact that I’ve even ordered the players into a rough order of village to wolfy and explained my feels has been more forthcoming than a lot of D1 play 🤷🏻♀️
It feels odd that you’re wolf-reading people who have questioned you the most, but you’re strongly village reading genny who’s actually voting for you (as of the last tally I saw).
I agree about Alissa, I need her to post more before I can accurately read her. She’s not a good D1 vote imo
Mostly myself and Pshelty. I phrased that a little rudely, but it feels like you and I and she and you have been speaking past each other at several points.
I agree with this assessment but imo I'm doing a really poor job of explaining my thoughts so I don't really blame AM.
I mean in theory, her list shouldn't really be correlated to who's putting suss on her if she's village and trying to gamesolve.
💯
genny just feels fine to me. I don't think she's wolfing so I'm village reading her.
@alleycat03 this is pretty mild defensiveness for alissa recebtly if memory serves, she’s been pretty on edge about misyeets.
Fwiw, I enjoyed the joke
I read this sentence like 6 times before I understood what you were asking
Yes and yes. The list I gave you earlier is ordered from oldest wolf game to most recent
That was a rough game for wolves, maybe you can ask @SportPonies about her extremely accurate vig gun. That was my first wolf game, and I distinctly remember being the only one disagreeing with a wolf!cray yeet. I was swiftly yeeted the next day and the game ended 😅
I agree with this definition. Though I think vibes read and tone read are almost similar in my head.
I didn’t explain it very well, idk how to put into words what I was seeing.
Why does that feel odd?
Wolf reading the people who think you’re sus solely because they’re suspicious of you isn’t the best method though. You should wolf read people who are actually sus, not just people who are wolf reading you.
i don't spell my name AM
Because it seems reactionary, and I explained my thoughts a bit further to true above this.
It didn’t seem mild to me, but point taken. It felt different from the misyeet edginess.
Wait I am confused
I'm aware. But given the main person we've been discussing is me, that's going to color my reads.
genny isn't voting for me. AM is.
Yeah I just realized that 😬
it's probably because of that weird thing i said to zengeOkay I’m stupid, I thought genny was voting PSV and not Alissa
Frowning at this post
But why is it weird that genny is at top? Is that not just evidence that she’s not automatically OMGUS reading, but is evaluating how different pushes on her feel?
Why? Reactionary cross-voting is bad. You don’t vote for people solely because they’re voting for you.
whomst are you inclined to vote at?
I got confused and thought genny was voting for PSV and not Alissa. PSV explained her read on genny and I understand her better now
Nah I was going on the assumption genny was voting psv due to multiple people stating it. My issue with your reasoning is based on that.
It’s straw-manning
I understand what a straw man argument is, but I don’t follow what discussion/argument you’re claiming is a straw man.
