Suckers...
60% of statistics are made up...
Actually, my stats were dead on if I knew nothing else. Even with what I knew, I was lucky enough with my picks... I was 50-50 at best, and only last minute went hedgie over dyachei...
But, if I wasn't group 2 leader, resistance didn't have a realistic shot. The balance was off with this imo.
The spies made minor inconsistencies that allowed me to call them out as suspicious... FFM not putting himself in, cracker.jack disapproval, then throwing WildZoo out there (I really would have disapproved any group she did), and stl being stl... I laughed when everyone was like "I think it's stl", made mission 2 easy for me to not pick him.
I played it exactly as I would have if I didn't know... Round 1 I was trying to goad them into success, and after round 2, i would have called a spy an idiot if they voted success. I had to do something drastic to get dyachei (who I only figured was the deep spy when she voted no round 4,and when I saw all the spies voted no, I knew 98cats wasn't the sleeper cell) off my trial, hence recommending a spy round 4... I didn't know if you all would follow, glad you didn't, but it might have done the trick with dyachei... That or she probably just couldn't believe I'd be so loud about it if I knew, but come on... It is me. I cursed Chillbo for giving me this role, soooo painful...
I love the concept of this game and think I can tweak the numbers, add more roles (plot cards which work like items, one will allow you to see a vote, one will allow you to auto disapprove, one will make you leader), and make it best of 7,and I think we have something. Thanks Chillbo, and I might roll with this in may...