I don't question the 1st and 2nd year. The students don't complain much about that. It's the 3rd/4th year I want to be confident about.
I am NOT a good source for judging the rotation situation at TUCOM, Leotiger or any other graduate/3rd/4th year MS would have a much better opinion. And I DON'T know if the rotations are mediocre or not (I mean the core ones, not the UCSF, Stanford, UCD ones we'd set up ourselves).
At the interview, Touro gave me a list of affiliations. Although they have added several new affiliations, I'll take quality over quantity. Being new, we'll have to wait for MS1 and 2s to tell us how they are. What the quality is, I have no clue.
In fact, I don't know much about any of the places, but leotiger mentioned that some places don't teach, so you have to learn on your own, but you do get to get your hands into a lot. Of course, the quality of the rotation experience depends on several factors like how you learn, what you make of it, the doc you are rotating with, the wide variance of patients and issues you get to encounter, etc. This goes for the "best" and "worst" described rotations. Having said that though, I want to know as much as I can, before I invest $200K.
Sure, those aforementioned schools are big name Great institutions, but how much DO/OMM support/mentorship will I get at those places? I want to be a damn good DO, preferably at TUCOM. How is the question.