UC Davis c/o 2025

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Can someone who took CASPer on Jan. 12 post here when their score is received as shown on portal? I still have one prereq left for Davis, I plan to take this online course that starts Jan. 27 and the last withdrawal date is Feb. 3. I really need to know whether I'll hear back from Davis on the final decision before I can drop the course with full refund🤣
 
Can someone who took CASPer on Jan. 12 post here when their score is received as shown on portal? I still have one prereq left for Davis, I plan to take this online course that starts Jan. 27 and the last withdrawal date is Feb. 3. I really need to know whether I'll hear back from Davis on the final decision before I can drop the course with full refund🤣
hi!! i took mine earlier for another school but i emailed with brandy and she said they take two weeks to get the score, but their goal is to have decisions out by the 29th!! (yes next friday yes the freak out begins)
 
hi!! i took mine earlier for another school but i emailed with brandy and she said they take two weeks to get the score, but their goal is to have decisions out by the 29th!! (yes next friday yes the freak out begins)
Oh wow it's getting real!
 
hi!! i took mine earlier for another school but i emailed with brandy and she said they take two weeks to get the score, but their goal is to have decisions out by the 29th!! (yes next friday yes the freak out begins)
Great... I'll now be focusing on nothing until next Friday. (gaaaaaaaaaah).
 
hi!! i took mine earlier for another school but i emailed with brandy and she said they take two weeks to get the score, but their goal is to have decisions out by the 29th!! (yes next friday yes the freak out begins)
Omg waiiittttt it's potentially the 29th now? I've literally told like 600 people I'm finding out the 31st lol
 
It might be even earlier than the 29th (hopefully?). At the info session, they said if CASPer scores come out earlier, they will let us know earlier (unless I misheard)
 
Last edited:
I took my test on Jan 12th and they haven’t been posted to my portal yet, I’ll keep y’all updated. I think they said the soonest they will get the last batch of scores is Jan 26, then they need to review them and send out decisions hopefully by the last business day of Jan which is the 29th.
 
That timing seems really tight (based on when they'll get the last of the CASPer results). Anyone know why they're trying to rush the notification of results? (e.g., to line up with decisions from other schools, etc.)?
 
That timing seems really tight (based on when they'll get the last of the CASPer results). Anyone know why they're trying to rush the notification of results? (e.g., to line up with decisions from other schools, etc.)?
Supposedly the just have to rank the CASPer score and that's the only criteria for this round of selection, that's probably why they don't need much time after the scores are received?
 
Supposedly the just have to rank the CASPer score and that's the only criteria for this round of selection, that's probably why they don't need much time after the scores are received?
@Ariel-Li Hm, that makes sense. That being said, I had emailed Davis asking about the Casper Snapshot silliness, and the response was that they "will send a special invite to a select group IF we deem it necessary for further review" (!!!)
 
@Ariel-Li Hm, that makes sense. That being said, I had emailed Davis asking about the Casper Snapshot silliness, and the response was that they "will send a special invite to a select group IF we deem it necessary for further review" (!!!)
I would assume probably for the waitlisted people, but hard to say.
 
Can someone who took CASPer on Jan. 12 post here when their score is received as shown on portal? I still have one prereq left for Davis, I plan to take this online course that starts Jan. 27 and the last withdrawal date is Feb. 3. I really need to know whether I'll hear back from Davis on the final decision before I can drop the course with full refund🤣
I took the CASPER on Jan. 12 and my score was sent to Davis this morning so I am hoping it will show up on my portal either today or tomorrow!
 
I took the CASPER on Jan. 12 and my score was sent to Davis this morning so I am hoping it will show up on my portal either today or tomorrow!
It's getting so real! I had a nightmare last night of being rejected from Davis and got horrible feedback on CASPer...I was like, huh, who knows my personality is that bad!😱
 
It's getting so real! I had a nightmare last night of being rejected from Davis and got horrible feedback on CASPer...I was like, huh, who knows my personality is that bad!😱
I've been having this nightmare for the past week 😂🤣😂
 
I took the CASPER on Jan. 12 and my score was sent to Davis this morning so I am hoping it will show up on my portal either today or tomorrow!
My portal says they received my score!
 
As a parent of an applicant, I am outraged that UCDSVM is using the Casper test as the sole criteria for admission at this point. This is an abdication of responsibility that is mind-boggling, and should not go unnoticed. There were so many other options for interviews, including what many other schools have chosen to do: interviews online. The Casper test was the LAST way admissions should be decided.

The school has a responsibility, vested in them by the public they serve, to be thorough in the admissions process. So many of these students have put years and years into this process, but most of their individual applications will have never been read. (Assuming it's true that the first sweep of applicants was based upon GPA, GRE scores, and LORs). How can a test, one that is normally used only to discover outliers, be used as the determining factor for admission? It is a strikingly apathetic decision, revealing obscene laziness or complete disregard for doing right by the students, or both. It is apparent that UCDSMV admissions does not really care about the students, but only about staying number 1 (as current UCDVM students are so often reminded of in school correspondence). With that attitude, UCDSMV won't stay number 1 for long, and they don't deserve to.

It's time for the vet school to do right, following the lead of the med school, and admit that the CASPER test scores are only able to, at most, be a partial determinant in admissions. Then resume this year's process correctly, justly, and honorably.
 
Last edited:
As a parent of an applicant, I am outraged that UCDSVM is using the Casper test as the sole criteria for admission at this point. This is an abdication of responsibility that is mind-boggling, and should not go unnoticed. There were so many other options for interviews, including what many other schools have chosen to do: interviews online. The Casper test was the LAST way admissions should be decided.

The school has a responsibility, vested in them by the public they serve, to be thorough in the admissions process. So many of these students have put years and years into this process, but most of their individual applications will have never been read. (Assuming it's true that the first sweep of applicants was based upon GPA, GRE scores, and LORs). How can a test, one that is normally used only to discover outliers, be used as the determining factor for admission? It is a strikingly apathetic decision, revealing obscene laziness or complete disregard for doing right by the students, or both. It is apparent that UCDSMV admissions does not really care about the students, but only about staying number 1 (as current students are so often reminded of in school correspondence). With that attitude, UCDSMV won't stay number 1 for long, and they don't deserve to.

It's time for the vet school to do right, following the lead of the med school, and admit that the CASPER test scores are only able to, at most, be a partial determinant in admissions. Then resume this year's process correctly, justly, and honorably.
Yeah I got rejected (based on GPA I assume) so I'm not personally invested in this part of the admissions process now, but just chiming in to say as a graduate of a UC school I'm not surprised. This school system has made it clear to all of us ( at least all recent graduates that I know) that their main priority is always to increase profits, this is more important to them than anything else including but not limited to: fairness in admissions, student well-being, quality of education, fair pay for all of their employees, and remaining the beacons of academic enlightenment that they advertise themselves to be. All of that being said, I am happy with the education that I received and enjoyed my time there but that doesn't make what I said lose its truths IMO.
 
Just from a different perspective, I feel that Davis is very up front about their admissions process and what they use in their application ranking and consideration. Is it perfect? No, but compared to some other schools that do a full holistic review you at least have a better idea of where you stand. And I am not the 4.0 across the board, perfect applicant that got into Davis and doesn't understand the rigor of this process. There are some schools I got rejected from during both my application cycles even after strongly improving the exact areas they said were the weak points and I still couldn't tell you if it made a difference because they look at things so holistically. Whereas with Davis, I knew the exact areas I had to improve because I knew exactly what I would be evaluated on.

As to being upset that they are using CASPer in place of interviews, that unfortunately is not going to change at this point for this cycle. If you truly have serious concerns and you think it should be done differently next cycle, that would be something to contact admissions about. They are typically open to thoughtful concerns. But I know they did a ton of research about the efficacy and comparative results of CASPer to MMI prior to making the decision to use it. Again, not at all saying its a perfect situation, just that they did put a lot of consideration into this decision.

Personally, I work with faculty and administration pretty frequently and have always felt like the vet school is very student centered. Most of the issues I have observed have been more so with adjustments made because of COVID which I'm sure every single school has had to do. After having experiences at a California State school for undergrad & an out of state school for grad school, I really feel like this program prioritizes student success. I also really appreciate how aware & proactive they are about vet school financially. Aside from the fact it is my instate, every year they give every student a grant towards tuition. They have a fund that they distribute equally, this is regardless of scholarships/loans/or whatever you decide to apply for. This year it was about $7500 per student. Out of all the schools I have visited/talked to through the application process or just personally, Davis SVM was the only one that didn't just acknowledge the debt of vet school, but actually had a plan to proactively reduce it for every student.

Thats the end of my spiel...I really got on here just to wish everyone luck on admissions decisions since they are supposed to come out by the end of the week!! I know the anticipation is literally terrible but just stick in there, and don't forget to *try* to take some deep breaths and remember how awesome you are!!
 
Also an applicant's family here... We had to go through Casper this year as well, and to be honest, I think the test itself is crazy... 😵

Obviously, I can't speak for UCD and why they picked Casper, but some vet schools, med schools, and dental schools are using Casper, and people who are going into education and counseling are also being "evaluated" by Casper. UCD certainly isn't the only school (but might be the only school that the last stage is solidly base on the test?!) I'm not saying it is a fair game, but the whole admission process has never been 100% fair to begin with. I do hope that they are trying to be as fair as possible but unfortunately, I think not one policy can serve everyone.

There is one applicant I happen to know very well. She has the skills as she has been working in a specialty hospital for over 10 years. She is a good teacher, a good friend, a good teammate, a leader in local community, and she has amazing work ethics. But, she is just not that type of person who will make a grand speech on the world is a wonderful places, and we can do this and that to get over the sadness "right away." She is also not that type of person who will strongly publicize her opinion and convince you to follow her steps. She is like the perfect example of "action speaks louder than words". Some of the questions in MMI will throw her off, and that's what happened last admission cycle. She practiced before the interview, and from what I know, she did well. But, her performance was just not good enough "compared" to others. However, she did wonderfully in traditional interviews and eventually received an admission from a well-respected vet school.

Will MMI pick wonderful students? Yes. Will MMI also miss some incredible applicants? Yes. Same as Casper and any kind of admission process...or job hunting/interview/test in the future to be honest. I understand the frustration. I was once in admission process and also served on the admission team as a student interviewer. We used to have this meeting after each interview day to discuss whom we will recommend to the admission office, so I had been on both sides. I know it's absolute annoying when (you feel) your fate is basically base on how couple people see you (or your answers/essays) in such a short time. But, I truly believe that if one wants to become a vet (or any good person in the society), this admission game will never stop him or her from becoming one. It is a very small portion of your life, with or without an admission to a certain school does NOT in any way decides who you are, and what you can achieve. 😉

Just wanted to wish everyone a good luck!
 
does anyone have a clue if we will be getting phone calls again this cycle or just emails? just trying to prepare my phone anxiety to one type of communication 😂
 
does anyone have a clue if we will be getting phone calls again this cycle or just emails? just trying to prepare my phone anxiety to one type of communication 😂
In the interview offer message it says that all interviewed applicants will be notified of admission decisions via the Applicant Portal by January 31, 2021. So I am assuming they will notify us through the portal/email!
 
does anyone have a clue if we will be getting phone calls again this cycle or just emails? just trying to prepare my phone anxiety to one type of communication 😂
Yeah we usually had a call night where student volunteers would call accepted applicants. I don't think this is happening due to COVID this year. Sorry guys! We try our best to make it special for you so hopefully by the time you get here we'll have something worked out to make up for it 🙂
 
Yeah we usually had a call night where student volunteers would call accepted applicants. I don't think this is happening due to COVID this year. Sorry guys! We try our best to make it special for you so hopefully by the time you get here we'll have something worked out to make up for it 🙂
makes total sense!! thanks for the update 🙂
 
T
Yeah we usually had a call night where student volunteers would call accepted applicants. I don't think this is happening due to COVID this year. Sorry guys! We try our best to make it special for you so hopefully by the time you get here we'll have something worked out to make up for it 🙂
This is helpful! So I'll be mindlessly refreshing only my email instead of both -.-
 
Also an applicant's family here... We had to go through Casper this year as well, and to be honest, I think the test itself is crazy... 😵

Obviously, I can't speak for UCD and why they picked Casper, but some vet schools, med schools, and dental schools are using Casper, and people who are going into education and counseling are also being "evaluated" by Casper. UCD certainly isn't the only school (but might be the only school that the last stage is solidly base on the test?!) I'm not saying it is a fair game, but the whole admission process has never been 100% fair to begin with. I do hope that they are trying to be as fair as possible but unfortunately, I think not one policy can serve everyone.

There is one applicant I happen to know very well. She has the skills as she has been working in a specialty hospital for over 10 years. She is a good teacher, a good friend, a good teammate, a leader in local community, and she has amazing work ethics. But, she is just not that type of person who will make a grand speech on the world is a wonderful places, and we can do this and that to get over the sadness "right away." She is also not that type of person who will strongly publicize her opinion and convince you to follow her steps. She is like the perfect example of "action speaks louder than words". Some of the questions in MMI will throw her off, and that's what happened last admission cycle. She practiced before the interview, and from what I know, she did well. But, her performance was just not good enough "compared" to others. However, she did wonderfully in traditional interviews and eventually received an admission from a well-respected vet school.

Will MMI pick wonderful students? Yes. Will MMI also miss some incredible applicants? Yes. Same as Casper and any kind of admission process...or job hunting/interview/test in the future to be honest. I understand the frustration. I was once in admission process and also served on the admission team as a student interviewer. We used to have this meeting after each interview day to discuss whom we will recommend to the admission office, so I had been on both sides. I know it's absolute annoying when (you feel) your fate is basically base on how couple people see you (or your answers/essays) in such a short time. But, I truly believe that if one wants to become a vet (or any good person in the society), this admission game will never stop him or her from becoming one. It is a very small portion of your life, with or without an admission to a certain school does NOT in any way decides who you are, and what you can achieve. 😉

Just wanted to wish everyone a good luck!
I think the key here is that Davis might be the only school to use the CASPer in the FINAL stage, which seems mind bogglingly backwards to me. Using CASPer is analogous to companies doing an HR/phone interview first to screen a huge number of resumes being submitted for a job. Since Davis shortlists based on a very quantitative and character/personality-blind list of qualifications (GRE+GPA+LOR scores), the traditional method of an in-person MMI interview makes a lot of sense as the final stage. But to replace the only 'human' step with yet another quantitative one seems to be a huge miss in the design of this year's application process.

(And for anyone that thinks CASPer actually tests for the characteristics it claims in its marketing copy, for what it's worth, I have an entire previous career of management consulting/organizational development where I've both managed teams and taught seminars on teamwork, and I'm pretty certain those who score higher on the CASPer will be those who've memorized the standard CASPer response format of "state the problem + appear nonjudgmental/empathetic + state priorities + if/then" and those who can type faster. Again, fine for the screening phase, but bewildering as the only determinant for the final stage).

It's a crazy year. I wish all of us luck. But most of all I wish all of us peace, with whatever our next steps are!
 
I think the key here is that Davis might be the only school to use the CASPer in the FINAL stage, which seems mind bogglingly backwards to me. Using CASPer is analogous to companies doing an HR/phone interview first to screen a huge number of resumes being submitted for a job. Since Davis shortlists based on a very quantitative and character/personality-blind list of qualifications (GRE+GPA+LOR scores), the traditional method of an in-person MMI interview makes a lot of sense as the final stage. But to replace the only 'human' step with yet another quantitative one seems to be a huge miss in the design of this year's application process.

(And for anyone that thinks CASPer actually tests for the characteristics it claims in its marketing copy, for what it's worth, I have an entire previous career of management consulting/organizational development where I've both managed teams and taught seminars on teamwork, and I'm pretty certain those who score higher on the CASPer will be those who've memorized the standard CASPer response format of "state the problem + appear nonjudgmental/empathetic + state priorities + if/then" and those who can type faster. Again, fine for the screening phase, but bewildering as the only determinant for the final stage).

It's a crazy year. I wish all of us luck. But most of all I wish all of us peace, with whatever our next steps are!
This is precisely the reason why I'm worried about my CASPer. I took it way earlier this application cycle for 2 other schools (that I don't quite care a lot about). If I had known Davis would use this for sole selection criteria I would have put in a lot more effort finding the "correct" way to answer those questions. I literally took it as a "personality test" and went in sincere - unprepared!
 
This is precisely the reason why I'm worried about my CASPer. I took it way earlier this application cycle for 2 other schools (that I don't quite care a lot about). If I had known Davis would use this for sole selection criteria I would have put in a lot more effort finding the "correct" way to answer those questions. I literally took it as a "personality test" and went in sincere - unprepared!
Exactly the same for me 🙁 I took it way earlier in the cycle for other schools that I didn’t really care that much for. I went into it totally unprepared
 
Last edited:
I think the key here is that Davis might be the only school to use the CASPer in the FINAL stage, which seems mind bogglingly backwards to me. Using CASPer is analogous to companies doing an HR/phone interview first to screen a huge number of resumes being submitted for a job. Since Davis shortlists based on a very quantitative and character/personality-blind list of qualifications (GRE+GPA+LOR scores), the traditional method of an in-person MMI interview makes a lot of sense as the final stage. But to replace the only 'human' step with yet another quantitative one seems to be a huge miss in the design of this year's application process.

(And for anyone that thinks CASPer actually tests for the characteristics it claims in its marketing copy, for what it's worth, I have an entire previous career of management consulting/organizational development where I've both managed teams and taught seminars on teamwork, and I'm pretty certain those who score higher on the CASPer will be those who've memorized the standard CASPer response format of "state the problem + appear nonjudgmental/empathetic + state priorities + if/then" and those who can type faster. Again, fine for the screening phase, but bewildering as the only determinant for the final stage).

It's a crazy year. I wish all of us luck. But most of all I wish all of us peace, with whatever our next steps are!
Exactly.
 
Is today the day...hopefullly? I’m been refreshing my email every 5 min
 
Is today the day...hopefullly? I’m been refreshing my email every 5 min
I just got an email from UC Davis SVM... from a newsletter inviting me to register for a CE event. 🤣 We probably won't hear until tomorrow tbh.
 
I think since the final casper scores were received several days ago it's possible we hear today!
 
Yeah, it's sort of amazing that the CASPer is being used. I personally thought it was fun to take, but how is it supposed to weed out candidates when we are the best of the best applicants? I bet a bunch of us get the exact same score... and then what? We wouldn't have made it this far if we didn't have the qualities CASPer tests for... so how is a personality test going to help them decide? The CASPer says that it works in quartiles, but if a lot of us on are the same level, the quartile range is going to be the difference of a few points. They might as well have determined our admissions based on our zodiac star chart and our meyers-briggs!
 
Just told my husband, "Need to go to bed early tonight. Tomorrow I need to walk up early and frantically refreshing my email although Davis is probably going to send out decisions 5pm PST" 🤣
 
Yeah, it's sort of amazing that the CASPer is being used. I personally thought it was fun to take, but how is it supposed to weed out candidates when we are the best of the best applicants? I bet a bunch of us get the exact same score... and then what? We wouldn't have made it this far if we didn't have the qualities CASPer tests for... so how is a personality test going to help them decide? The CASPer says that it works in quartiles, but if a lot of us on are the same level, the quartile range is going to be the difference of a few points. They might as well have determined our admissions based on our zodiac star chart and our meyers-briggs!
#funnynotfunny.

Okay officially holding my breath now and sending good juju across the vast interwebs to all of you out there!
 
Top