- Joined
- Sep 23, 2003
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 0
Does anyone have the list? Would be interested if you could post...
Unfilled programs don't mean they are bad. Plenty of well known, highly respected programs have gone unfilled.
Now if a program goes has to scramble for three or four years in a row, then that would make me concerned about the program.
Forgive the naive 2nd year ms question....
but why are these unfilled? Don't these spots go out to prospective EM residents who did not match? Did they not even fill during the scramble?
I thought those people who are bummed they did not match into any EM residency would get a shot at these unfilled slots? How does it work?
cheers
d
Sparrow has scrambled at least 2 of the last 3 matches, and I can't remember last year if they did.
Sparrow filled last year, I was the chief resident for recruiting. ... You come out of there knowing how to work in the pit, and you pass your boards. Period. No fluff, no big time showmanship.
I think that the "unfilled" status of Sparrow must have something to do with the way they are reporting since they have spots reserved for DO's from last years match. I thought Lansing seemed like a great program. The hospital was one of the nicest of the programs I interviewed at (maybe, the nicest). The residents there were great too. Unfortunately, I was a little afraid of the cold weather and the fact that Michigan's economy seems to be in the gutter, which trickles down to everyone in the state. With those factors seeming to be the largest possible contributors, I'm having a hard time understanding how Lansing wouldn't fill and Saginaw would. Again, nothing against Saginaw but it seems like it would have had about the same difficulty as Lansing and Grand Rapids.Sparrow filled last year, I was the chief resident for recruiting. I suspect applicants just are not thrilled with living in Lansing or Saginaw Michigan. But I also know that applicants seem to be getting much more sure of themselves as far as the match. I met many, many candidates during the interviews who were simply incredibly arrogant. Many were only going to rank their top 4 programs. I know for a fact that there were candidates this year who did not rank Sparrow, only to find them begging for a spot in the scramble.
So I think there is sometimes a level of confidence beyond the person's probability of gaining a spot somewhere. And where Sparrow was concerned when I was there we sometimes only ranked 35 candidates, a very, very short list. This was done simply because we felt if we had to scramble we could get people who were the top of the heap of those that maybe overreached and went for competitive programs they didn't have a realistic chance of getting into. This was considered a better option than ranking people we simply didn't care to have on board.
Two years ago we obtained a guy in the scramble who is the chief resident this year and one of the best residents I've ever worked with. But he got into the process late the year he applied, applied only on the East Coast, and simply was not a good fit for them.
I've noticed ever since I was in medical school that medical education has changed dramatically in the past 5 years or so. Medical schools cater to how students want to be taught and residency programs have followed suit. Many big programs practically have PR people working for them. I went to the SAEM residency fair 3 years ago, and the big programs had slick New York/Madison ave style banners, candy, pens, etc., etc. They were surrounded by med students, like trying to get a date with the prom queen. There were students falling all over themselves trying to get attention from one of the residents. It was like watching high school kids, and it disgusted me.
I'll take the Sparrow program any day. It's a meat and potato type of place...grind it out work, sick patients, 100,000/year census, huge new ED with helicopter. You're not pampered as a resident, you work very independently and have to figure stuff out on your own a lot. You come out of there knowing how to work in the pit, and you pass your boards. Period. No fluff, no big time showmanship.
And where Sparrow was concerned when I was there we sometimes only ranked 35 candidates, a very, very short list. This was done simply because we felt if we had to scramble we could get people who were the top of the heap of those that maybe overreached and went for competitive programs they didn't have a realistic chance of getting into. This was considered a better option than ranking people we simply didn't care to have on board.
Th e AOA positions are not reported as unfilled for dual programs. When DO interns have matched both into the internship and residency, they first year of their
I think he meant Alpha Omega Alpha, the national honor society for medical schools, not the American Osteopathic Association.
I find this line of reasoning a little disturbing.
Programs not filling cause people to wonder what went wrong. It usually results in someone from the program to post something along the lines of what you said - scramble vs ranking people we don't want. The solution seems to be to interview enough people to have enough people to rank in order to fill without having to resort to the scramble, not the reverse.
Getting people from the 'top of the heap of people who didn't have a realistic chance of matching into the programs they interviewed at' sounds like the same group of smug candidates that only ranked 4-5 programs that overeached and were overconfident in their abilities in matching. As I recall you didn't think much of them during interview, but you're entertaining signing those same people during the scramble?
It doesn't make sense.
Buffalo didn't fill last year. We didn't rank enough people. Period.