Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I could send out for an overnight full blood panel, and get the results tomorrow morning, if that's what we want?My personal vote for test is on NSFW - full blood
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I could send out for an overnight full blood panel, and get the results tomorrow morning, if that's what we want?My personal vote for test is on NSFW - full blood
I agree with this. Let's send out an overnight?I could send out for an overnight full blood panel, and get the results tomorrow morning, if that's what we want?
I'm leaning towards NSFW. He hasn't said much, most of his posts are agreeing with others, not much analaysis.I agree with this. Let's send out an overnight?
Who are we doing it on? NSFW?
But it's been mentioned previously that anyone else with cancer will be villagers - there aren't any more cancer patients that are wolves. If we can choose a test that would give us enough data to diagnose cancer, that could help us.I'd personally pick serher and I have a feeling that bloodwork may not give any significant findings for some players
Example, sending out bw on me would probably reveal high phosphorus (age), maybe slight increase wbc and maybe increased globulins... and that's probably it.
We may want to consider doing physical exams on people. My physical exam would reveal much more information about my condition than bloodwork. Obviously, this will vary depending on the person.
And, again, I don't think knowing anyone's condition/ailment will give us info on if they are wolf or villager.
What test will be the most helpful right now? We're fairly confident that other cancers will be village. Having a stockpile of tests will be helpful as we find other wolves and 'clear' their categories as non-originals. But what test gives the most clues for identifying category of illness?
@DVMDream @LetItSnow @SummerTheLynx to tag some doctor-y people, but please anyone jump in with opinions
There is so more cancer villagers IF the game mechanics guess is correct.But it's been mentioned previously that anyone else with cancer will be villagers - there aren't any more cancer patients that are wolves. If we can choose a test that would give us enough data to diagnose cancer, that could help us.
So I'm more inclined to believe that each disease grouping might have a wolf, with the rest as villagers.
But it's been mentioned previously that anyone else with cancer will be villagers - there aren't any more cancer patients that are wolves. If we can choose a test that would give us enough data to diagnose cancer, that could help us.
So I'm more inclined to believe that each disease grouping might have a wolf, with the rest as villagers.
I mean. I can do a physical examination. No clue how much history I can get from it, but I can see.I don't know that I can answer that. I mean. It just depends on the patient.
Rads maybe for metastatic disease. Ultrasound for metastatic disease .... lymph nodes .... etc. PE for peripheral lymph nodes or mass palpation. Bloodwork for an elevated Ca for paraneoplastic syndrome....
I mean.... just hard to say what the 'best' way to find cancer is because cancer is really just a big huge category for some pretty widely varying diseases.
To identify category of illness? Um........ I vote for taking a good history. I mean, I'm usually halfway to a diagnosis at that point.
But really, I don't think it's that easy.
There is a game that I have seen my humans play before. It is a game where they take little pieces of paper and...no, they do not eat the paper or try to chase it. I agree that would be more fun. But anyways, they take these little pieces of paper called "cards", and they ask a question like "if someone has cancer, then they are a villager." The best way to find out if this is true is to find out if there is a wolf who has cancer. Maybe this will help them understand better: https://www.socialpsychology.org/teach/wason.htm
But it's been mentioned previously that anyone else with cancer will be villagers - there aren't any more cancer patients that are wolves. If we can choose a test that would give us enough data to diagnose cancer, that could help us.
So I'm more inclined to believe that each disease grouping might have a wolf, with the rest as villagers.
I mean. I can do a physical examination. No clue how much history I can get from it, but I can see.
I don't think we can quite make that leap that anyone else with cancer=villager. Yes that's the current theory, but we need to still keep an open mind.
And cancer isn't something that you're going to easily pick up on bloodwork unless it is something stupid obvious (leukemic crisis).
I don't think we can quite make that leap that anyone else with cancer=villager. Yes that's the current theory, but we need to still keep an open mind.
And cancer isn't something that you're going to easily pick up on bloodwork unless it is something stupid obvious (leukemic crisis).
Heck, sometimes you think an animal has cancer and you've run all the tests and still can't find it.
A good history and physical exam gives you the best information. And I'm usually running tests to confirm what I already think or to just rule out any concurrent conditions.
Agreed on both accounts (except maybe for hypercalcemia .... sure, there are all the HOGS IN YARD rule/outs, but let's face it, next to renal failure, cancer is the biggie ... everyone will say "a-ha! hyperparathyroidism!" but gimme a break - how many hypercalcemic patients are hyperparathyroid compared to how many are cancer?).
I wouldn't mind a good physical exam from CDO. 😉
As the name suggests.Snort. Nicely played.
Why did I know you were gonna do that? You're high on the list, NSFW, you wouldn't need to tell me twice.I wouldn't mind a good physical exam from CDO. 😉

***lynch AM***
still leaning off of gwen from her results she posted.
Would still like to hear why people are still so set on Gwen after her results, since the ability that would give those seems pretty obvious and is very villager like.
Any test would include species, gender, age- basic stuff that you have to enter when entering the panel info.
Twice, early morning.Has Gwen checked in at all today (Sunday)?
Maybe I'm biased, but this seems like odd phrasing to me. Everyone here has a role in this game.
If this is a question directly to me, specifics weren't given.
Reading back I still have feels on Serher. Her posts rub me in the "trying too hard" sort of way. Are we still planning on running blood or T4 on her @cdoconn?
####lynch serher#### to put a vote on the board
Agreed on both accounts (except maybe for hypercalcemia .... sure, there are all the HOGS IN YARD rule/outs, but let's face it, next to renal failure, cancer is the biggie ... everyone will say "a-ha! hyperparathyroidism!" but gimme a break - how many hypercalcemic patients are hyperparathyroid compared to how many are cancer?).
Has Gwen checked in at all today (Sunday)?
Not an excuse, but I I tend to fall into this trap in WW frequently. I don't have a stellar defense other than what I've posted. My ability is passive, which is impossible to prove, doesn't make me a wolf but doesn't make me a villager either.
Ser gives me feels, PBC gives me feels, AM gives me feels. On mobile so I can't pinpoint posts. Which is similar to others feels, so "Gwen is just bandwagoning with everyone else, she doesn't have an original thought!"
I'm familiar with this happening to me, so yeah, I've been hoping for voting to blow over because the reasons for my lynch are, imo, flimsy, but I have no solid reasons to push others so![]()
There's only so many times I can get indignant about being an "easy lynch"
Maybe I'm biased, but this seems like odd phrasing to me. Everyone here has a role in this game.
If this is a question directly to me, specifics weren't given.
Reading back I still have feels on Serher. Her posts rub me in the "trying too hard" sort of way. Are we still planning on running blood or T4 on her @cdoconn?
####lynch serher#### to put a vote on the board
I'd personally pick serher and I have a feeling that bloodwork may not give any significant findings for some players
Example, sending out bw on me would probably reveal high phosphorus (age), maybe slight increase wbc and maybe increased globulins... and that's probably it.
We may want to consider doing physical exams on people. My physical exam would reveal much more information about my condition than bloodwork. Obviously, this will vary depending on the person.
And, again, I don't think knowing anyone's condition/ailment will give us info on if they are wolf or villager.

Lol... I use HARD IONS
Surprisingly enough for how much cancer I attracted in clinics not a single one was hypercalcemic. My only hypercalcemic patient was a primary hyperparathyroid patient.
This is just an aside, I completely agree with your above point. Though the oncologist I did work with stated that while he does see hypercalcemia of malignancy, he feels it is exaggerated how often it really does occur.
Surprisingly enough for how much cancer I attracted in clinics not a single one was hypercalcemic. My only hypercalcemic patient was a primary hyperparathyroid patient.
This is just an aside, I completely agree with your above point. Though the oncologist I did work with stated that while he does see hypercalcemia of malignancy, he feels it is exaggerated how often it really does occur.
I've already said that a PE would be the best choice for me too.
I give up. It is late enough and I am not reading through this again to figure out what I have missed before lynch.
My top 2 choices are Gwen and Lyra right now. Followed by a bunch of the new folks. It bothers me that Gwen is not defending, but I feel like I have memories of her not defending and hard defending as a wolf, so I don't know where to go with that.
I wanna believe Lyra.
Next is AM, serher... that whole kerfuffle.
I guess as my strongest question:
Lynch Gwen
Recently went to CE for one of our local specialty hospitals, and I don't know where they're citing this from or just in their experience, but he claimed in the absence of renal disease, 2/3rds of feline hypercalcemia patients are hyperC of malignancy, and 2/3rds of those are lymphoma.Yeah, I agree with the oncologist. Most cancer patients aren't hypercalcemic. But most hypercalcemic patients are cancer patients if they aren't renal patients. 🙂
well since deadline is in 5 minutes and no one is changing so shes screwed anyway, from her results it seems like she is some sort of tracker (if she wasn't lying about them and they weren't from an item).I wish I could talk to you about this via pm. Argh. If anyone in my pm group agrees with caiter on this point and sees what gwen's ability probably is, please message me about it. And no this is not me fishing for abilities because she will go home if I (and other people) don't change our votes
*************
Recently went to CE for one of our local specialty hospitals, and I don't know where they're citing this from or just in their experience, but he claimed in the absence of renal disease, 2/3rds of feline hypercalcemia patients are hyperC of malignancy, and 2/3rds of those are lymphoma.
well since deadline is in 5 minutes and no one is changing so shes screwed anyway, from her results it seems like she is some sort of tracker (if she wasn't lying about them and they weren't from an item).
That's the only thing that's been holding me back from voting from her, cause again I'm pretty sure I know who she used her ability/item/whatever on that would give those results.
Didn't even think about. Weird, then it seems like it would be an item then? But since gwen hasn't been around to expand on it, I don't really know what to think.I actually thought it was tracking from first glance too, but our odd night tracker just died (karabou). Thanks for sharing
Didn't even think about. Weird, then it seems like it would be an item then? But since gwen hasn't been around to expand on it, I don't really know what to think.
Our mission is to provide students with free, unbiased information, resources, and advising for careers in the health professions. We believe every student deserves access to trustworthy guidance, regardless of background or ability to pay.