Vote for President

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Vote for President

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 150 52.1%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 138 47.9%

  • Total voters
    288
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's funny that people call Trump a bigot, when he's not actually a bigot.

Default accusations from the leftists are "racist, misogynist, xenophobe", and nobody cares anymore, because everyone is accused of this now.


"
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/donald-trump-white-nationalist-afp-delegate-california

Trump Selects a White Nationalist Leader as a Delegate in California

On Monday evening, California's secretary of state published a list of delegates chosen by the Trump campaign for the upcoming Republican presidential primary in the state. Trump's slate includes William Johnson, one of the country's most prominent white nationalists. [Update: Responding to this story late Tuesday, the Trump campaign blamed Johnson's selection on a "database error," and Johnson told Mother Jones he would resign. Here are documents showing the Trump campaign's personal correspondence with Johnson yesterday.]

Johnson applied to the Trump campaign to be a delegate. He was accepted on Monday. In order to be approved he had to sign this pledge sent to him by the campaign: "I, William Johnson, endorse Donald J. Trump for the office of President of the United States. I pledge to cast ALL of my ballots to elect Donald J. Trump on every round of balloting at the 2016 Republican National Convention so that we can MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" After he signed, the Trump campaign added his name to the list of 169 delegates it forwarded to the secretary of state.

"I can be a white nationalist and be a strong supporter of Donald Trump and be a good example to everybody," Johnson says.
Johnson leads the American Freedom Party, a group that "exists to represent the political interests of White Americans" and aims to preserve "the customs and heritage of the European American people." The AFP has never elected a candidate of its own and possesses at most a few thousand members, but it is "arguably the most important white nationalist group in the country," according to Mark Potok, a senior fellow for the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which tracks hate groups.

Johnson got the news that he had been selected by Trump in a congratulatory email sent to him by the campaign's California delegate coordinator, Katie Lagomarsino. "I just hope to show how I can be mainstream and have these views," Johnson tells Mother Jones. "I can be a white nationalist and be a strong supporter of Donald Trump and be a good example to everybody."

Johnson says that in his application to be a delegate for Trump he disclosed multiple details about his background and activism, though he did not specifically use the term "white nationalist." The Trump campaign and Lagomarsino did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Whether or not Johnson was vetted by the Trump campaign, the GOP front-runner would have a hard time claiming ignorance of Johnson's extreme views: Johnson has gained notice during the presidential primary for funding pro-Trump robocalls that convey a white nationalist message. "The white race is dying out in America and Europe because we are afraid to be called 'racist,'" Johnson says in one robocall pushed out to residential landlines in Vermont and Minnesota. "Donald Trump is not racist, but Donald Trump is not afraid. Don't vote for a Cuban. Vote for Donald Trump."

Armed with cash from affluent donors and staffed by what the movement considers to be its top thinkers, the AFP now dedicates most of its resources to supporting Trump. Johnson claims that the AFP's pro-Trump robocalls, which have delivered Johnson's personal cellphone number to voters in seven states, have helped the party find hundreds of new members. "[Trump] is allowing us to talk about things we've not been able to talk about," Johnson says. "So even if he is not elected, he has achieved great things."

"This message is paid for by William Johnson, a farmer and a white nationalist."
On multiple occasions, Trump has failed to forcefully repudiate this sort of support. After being endorsed by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke in August last year, Trump told Bloomberg News, "I don't need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn't want his endorsement. I don't need anybody's endorsement."

Asked in February about the robocalls, which are funded by Johnson through a super-PAC, a Trump spokeswoman would only tell CNN that the candidate had "disavowed all super-PACs offering their support." In April, the Huffington Post reported that Trump returned a $250 donation to his campaign from Johnson.

The SPLC's Potok says Trump has "legitimized and mainstreamed hate" in ways we haven't seen since the days of George Wallace. Though nobody can say for sure how many people belong to America's largest hate groups, the SPLC has found that the number of such groups grew by 14 percent in 2015, reversing years of declines. Potok worries that Trump could fuel the spread of the AFP's ideas for years to come.

Johnson is a corporate lawyer who grows persimmons and raises chickens at his 67-acre "ranch" in a Los Angeles suburb. When I met him recently outside his law office in downtown LA's World Trade Center, he was in high spirits. He suggested brightly that we walk downstairs to get lunch at a nearby Korean restaurant. As we sat next to a table of immaculately coiffed Korean Air flight attendants, I mentioned that some might find it surprising that a guy who wrote a book advocating the creation of an all-white ethno-state was eating a plate of bulgogi beef with kimchee. "Koreans don't have to make Korean food," he said matter-of-factly. "One of the best Chinese restaurants I went to in the Bay Area is owned by a Mormon and cooked by a Mormon. Really great Chinese food."

Short, graying, and 61 years old, Johnson favors pressed white shirts and bookish black-framed glasses. He grew up in predominantly white neighborhoods in Arizona and Oregon before moving to Japan in 1974 to study the language. It was there that locals engaged him in "open" discussions about differences between the races, and he came to see America's European heritage as its biggest—and most vulnerable—asset. (This trajectory is not uncommon: Jared Taylor, head of the white nationalist group American Renaissance, also speaks fluent Japanese, and Aryan Nations founder Richard Butler became a white supremacist while immersed in the caste system in India.) In 1985, Johnson published, under a pseudonym,Amendment to the Constitution: Averting the Decline and Fall of America, a book calling for the abolition of the 14th and 15th Amendments and the deportation of all nonwhites. He tried to sound a practical tone, allowing, for instance, that African Americans should receive "a rich dowry to enable them to prosper in their homeland."

The book was a hit on the talk show circuit, and Johnson suddenly found himself appearing on television alongside neo-Nazi skinheads and Klansmen. By 1989, his notoriety and clean-cut appeal convinced a group of white nationalists in Wyoming to tap him to run for Dick Cheney's vacant congressional seat. He garnered a flurry of press coverage when he earned enough signatures to qualify for the ballot; around the same time, the building housing his California law office was bombed. Johnson says the FBI accused him of detonating it himself in a bid for more press. (The bureau declined to comment.)

"The skinheads thought I was too extreme to run the organization."
Twenty years later, after unsuccessfully running for various other offices, Johnson became the head of the American Freedom Party (then known as American Third Position), at the request of a group of Southern California skinheads. Johnson's post was supposed to be temporary: "The skinheads thought I was too extreme to run the organization," he explained. But they were the ones who ended up dropping out, replaced by what has become a sort of white nationalist brain trust: Party leaders now include a former Reagan administration appointee and a professor emeritus at California State University-Long Beach.

After our Korean lunch, Johnson rushed back up to his office to host the latest episode of For God and Country, a Christian AM talk show currently broadcast in California, Louisiana, and Texas. His Filipino American co-host, the Rev. Ronald Tan, nodded approvingly as Johnson praised Trump on the air for "busting up the concept of political correctness."

The show allows Johnson to push a Trump-centric version of white nationalism to a potentially receptive audience—up to a point. Several radio stations in Iowa recently canceled the program out of objection to its content. During a commercial break, Johnson fidgeted. "Are you going to quote any more Scriptures?" he asked Tan nervously. "Has the station said that we're not Christian enough?" Back on the air, Tan pivoted to 1 Samuel 16, comparing Trump to King David.

In addition to promoting Trump on the radio and over the phone, the AFP streams a podcast called the Daily Trump Phenomenon Hour. It has set up a "political harassment hotline" for Trump supporters who wish to consult with an attorney about being attacked or verbally abused by anti-Trump protesters. Johnson has personally spent $30,000 on the Trump promotions, including $18,000 for the robocalls.

The robocalls, the radio show, and the "harassment hotline" were all things that Johnson mentioned in his application to become a Trump delegate. He specifically cited an anti-Romney robocall commissioned in Utah this past March, which begins, in part, "My name is William Johnson. I am a farmer and a white nationalist."

After wrapping up the radio show, Johnson led me through his office, where a brush-painted screen hangs alongside shelves stacked with Japanese books and dictionaries. Many of his legal clients, it turns out, are foreigners who speak English as a second language. Yet Johnson says he sees no problem with Trump's isolationist foreign policy, even if it hurts his business—ideally, he'd like to give up his practice and serve as Trump's secretary of agriculture.

We ended up in a mirrored conference room to meet with three AFP sympathizers, two middle-aged women and a young man. They talked about how Trump had enabled a new kind of "honest discourse," how he wasn't a racist but a "racialist," and how he had left them feeling "emancipated." Johnson also now finds it easier to be himself: "For many, many years, when I would say these things, other white people would call me names: 'Oh, you're a hatemonger, you're a Nazi, you're like Hitler,'" he confessed. "Now they come in and say, 'Oh, you're like Donald Trump.'"
"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
It's funny that people call Trump a bigot, when he's not actually a bigot.

Default accusations from the leftists are "racist, misogynist, xenophobe", and nobody cares anymore, because everyone is accused of this now.
I don't know if he's a bigot, because he says what he thinks his supporters want to hear, and changes with the wind. But their is absolutely NO denying that he says things only bigots would say. Or what liars or dumb people would say. He's Sarah Palin with stupid hair.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Well, Trump's gonna start taking big business donations and he's not gonna reveal his taxes.
I think he's lost the election - the Trumpkins loved that he wasn't gonna take big money. I doubt anyone cares about his taxes except for the lefties.
 

I guess Hillary Klanton's support and embrace of a KKK grand dragon doesn't bother you?

gUJyFM.jpg




KKK also raised $20k for Clinton's campaign, and formally endorsed Hillary, but Hillary still hasn't disavowed the KKK, months later.

http://www.vocativ.com/312479/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president/
 
It's ironic also that illegal aliens are now considered a protected racial group by leftists, when illegal aliens are not a race.

Unless of course you yourself are racist in stereotyping all Mexicans as illegal immigrants, like Hillary was guilty of last week.
 
Well, Trump's gonna start taking big business donations and he's not gonna reveal his taxes.
I think he's lost the election - the Trumpkins loved that he wasn't gonna take big money. I doubt anyone cares about his taxes except for the lefties.

He won the Republican nomination without being bought by special interests.

He has no obligation to the lobbyists, unlike $hillary.

And Hillary lost the last several primaries against a 74 year old socialist, despite being completely owned by special interests, yet you think Trump has no chance against the biggest bribed politician in US history.
 
He won the Republican nomination without being bought by special interests.

He has no obligation to the lobbyists, unlike $hillary.

And Hillary lost the last several primaries against a 74 year old socialist, despite being completely owned by special interests, yet you think Trump has no chance against the biggest bribed politician in US history.

The problem is - he will now be joining her and will be bought for as well. If you take big money, it comes with big strings attached. He back pedals on everything anyways, and now it'll be pretty obvious. If he stuck with the little man donations and his strategy of using and abusing the media, he would have been much better off.

I think this election will be close either way, but this assures Hillary wins. Trump won't be able to use his method of campaigning to slam her like he was able to during the Republication debates en route to winning the Republican nomination.
 
The problem is - he will now be joining her and will be bought for as well. If you take big money, it comes with big strings attached. He back pedals on everything anyways, and now it'll be pretty obvious. If he stuck with the little man donations and his strategy of using and abusing the media, he would have been much better off.

I think this election will be close either way, but this assures Hillary wins. Trump won't be able to use his method of campaigning to slam her like he was able to during the Republication debates en route to winning the Republican nomination.

Trump is running against the political machine. Hillary is just another crooked politician that the country is fed up with. I don't think the narrative changes if businesses give money to the RNC for the general election.

How would Hillary even try to use that to her advantage? She still hasn't released her Goldman Sachs transcripts, it's easy for Trump to hit her on that. And the Bernie supporters are still incensed by Hillary's crooked politicking; Trump bringing up the transcripts incessantly will rub salt in their wounds, and they'll either not vote at all, or vote against Hillary.

And this isn't even touching on her corrupt foundation slush fund, her email scandal, the 3am Benghazi phone call, her disastrous record in Syria with isis, the disastrous Iran deal, the intervention in Libya on behalf of Blumenthal and his private company, her destroying the lives of Bill's rape victims, her support of dictators and regimes with horrible human rights records especially regarding women, selling arms to Saudi Arabia after receiving donations and speaking fees from them.

The list goes on and on. Hillary is really the easiest candidate to take down. Her popularity is already tanking. All she had was the woman card, and she's being destroyed on her record. And Trump hasn't even started on her yet.
 
Hillary claimed all Hispanics are illegal aliens.

That's pretty bigoted of Hillary to say.
As an educated person, you interpret what she said as "all Hispanics" being illegal?

You must wonder how she came to that conclusion. Does she think the government doesn't grant Hispanics citizenship? Does she not know that entire states were Hispanic when they were absorbed into the union along with their Hispanic populations?

My guess is of course she knows those things. I'm not stupid so I recognize that she's just making an effort to make Trump look like a hypocrite because he wants to deport 11 million of the Hispanics he loves.
 
Trump is running against the political machine. Hillary is just another crooked politician that the country is fed up with. I don't think the narrative changes if businesses give money to the RNC for the general election.

How would Hillary even try to use that to her advantage? She still hasn't released her Goldman Sachs transcripts, it's easy for Trump to hit her on that. And the Bernie supporters are still incensed by Hillary's crooked politicking; Trump bringing up the transcripts incessantly will rub salt in their wounds, and they'll either not vote at all, or vote against Hillary.

And this isn't even touching on her corrupt foundation slush fund, her email scandal, the 3am Benghazi phone call, her disastrous record in Syria with isis, the disastrous Iran deal, the intervention in Libya on behalf of Blumenthal and his private company, her destroying the lives of Bill's rape victims, her support of dictators and regimes with horrible human rights records especially regarding women, selling arms to Saudi Arabia after receiving donations and speaking fees from them.

The list goes on and on. Hillary is really the easiest candidate to take down. Her popularity is already tanking. All she had was the woman card, and she's being destroyed on her record. And Trump hasn't even started on her yet.
He started on her months ago. He was talking about her support of Bill despite his affairs and her attachment to Wall Street months ago.

And of course he will "go after her." Attacking others is how he avoids demonstrating his blatantly obvious lack of even a basic understanding of ANY important political issue. I don't know if he's dumb or not, but he hasn't proven otherwise.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
He won the Republican nomination without being bought by special interests.

He has no obligation to the lobbyists, unlike $hillary.

And Hillary lost the last several primaries against a 74 year old socialist, despite being completely owned by special interests, yet you think Trump has no chance against the biggest bribed politician in US history.
You mean somebody who's only 6 years older than her, and 5 older than Trump? I love when people point out Sanders' age, like he's old and crippled, but forget about their own favorite. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump is running against the political machine. Hillary is just another crooked politician that the country is fed up with. I don't think the narrative changes if businesses give money to the RNC for the general election.

How would Hillary even try to use that to her advantage? She still hasn't released her Goldman Sachs transcripts, it's easy for Trump to hit her on that. And the Bernie supporters are still incensed by Hillary's crooked politicking; Trump bringing up the transcripts incessantly will rub salt in their wounds, and they'll either not vote at all, or vote against Hillary.

And this isn't even touching on her corrupt foundation slush fund, her email scandal, the 3am Benghazi phone call, her disastrous record in Syria with isis, the disastrous Iran deal, the intervention in Libya on behalf of Blumenthal and his private company, her destroying the lives of Bill's rape victims, her support of dictators and regimes with horrible human rights records especially regarding women, selling arms to Saudi Arabia after receiving donations and speaking fees from them.

The list goes on and on. Hillary is really the easiest candidate to take down. Her popularity is already tanking. All she had was the woman card, and she's being destroyed on her record. And Trump hasn't even started on her yet.
explain how and why trump puts money in the medical field
 
As an educated person, you interpret what she said as "all Hispanics" being illegal?

You must wonder how she came to that conclusion. Does she think the government doesn't grant Hispanics citizenship? Does she not know that entire states were Hispanic when they were absorbed into the union along with their Hispanic populations?

My guess is of course she knows those things. I'm not stupid so I recognize that she's just making an effort to make Trump look like a hypocrite because he wants to deport 11 million of the Hispanics he loves.

Trump has only ever talked about deporting illegal aliens.

Hillary knows this.

But she implies that when Trump says he loves Hispanics, he also wants to deport them all.

Hillary was the one who made the bigoted conclusion.

Like in 2008 with this gem of a quote:

"'I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,' she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article 'that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.'"

Crooked Hillary Clinton is a racist and a bigot.
 
Trump has only ever talked about deporting illegal aliens.

Hillary knows this.

But she implies that when Trump says he loves Hispanics, he also wants to deport them all.

Hillary was the one who made the bigoted conclusion.

Like in 2008 with this gem of a quote:

"'I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,' she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article 'that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.'"

Crooked Hillary Clinton is a racist and a bigot.
Careful, not to become a bully yourself, by picking up his bad habits. ;)

"Whites who had not completed college" is a typical poll classification. It's about as racist/bigoted as saying that malignant hypertension is more frequent in African American men. It's a fact.
 
You mean somebody who's only 6 years older than her, and 5 older than Trump? I love when people point out Sanders' age, like he's old and crippled, but forget about their own favorite. ;)

Despite Hillary being slightly younger, she doesn't have the stamina to be commander in chief.

She also apparently has some serious issues with elder confusion:
Newly released email shows top aide Huma Abedin warned colleagues Hillary was 'often confused' and needed hand-holding

  • Abedin: Have you been going over her calls with her? So she knows singh is at 8? [India Prime Minister Manmohan Singh]
  • Hanley: She was in bed for a nap by the time I heard that she had an 8am call. Will go over with her
  • Abedin: Very imp to do that. She’s often confused.

Not even to mention she didn't answer the 3am phone call for help in Benghazi.

Where was she?
 
Careful, not to become a bully by association. ;)

"Whites who had not completed college" is a typical poll classification. It's about as racist/bigoted as saying that malignant hypertension is more frequent in African American men. It's a fact.

I was referring to her stating the hard working Americans are primarily white Americans:
"hard-working Americans, white Americans"
 
I was referring to her stating the hard working Americans are primarily white Americans:
"hard-working Americans, white Americans"
She could have been stating also that white Americans are hard-working. ;)

Listen, both candidates are far from ideal, if one looks carefully. Just don't let either of them brainwash you.
 
She could have been stating also that white Americans are hard-working. ;)

Listen, both candidates are far from ideal, if one looks carefully. Just don't let either of them brainwash you.

Repeal of obamacare should be our #1 priority.
 
Whether or not Trump is a bigot or racist, I guess can be debatable. But what is not debatable is that those people definitely flock to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Whether or not Trump is a bigot or racist, I guess can be debatable. But what is not debatable is that those people definitely flock to him.

KKK Grand Dragons flock to Hillary Clinton.

Americans are flocking to Donald Trump and his message of Putting America First.

There are bad players in all circles, and even Hillary Klanton has her KKK supporters.
 
Not at any price. The country is more important than my checkbook.

Healthcare can be done cheaper and better.

Obamacare was never the answer. The intent of Obamacare was actually the accelerated collapse of the healthcare system and pushing it towards single-payer.

Hospitals were forced to consolidate with obamacare, buy up individual practices, get all physicians under one umbrella. Once everybody is under the umbrella, the government takes the umbrella away and beats everyone under it to death.

We need insurance competition across state lines (remove monopolistic conditions), and more transparency for healthcare service pricing so that everyone can compete on price. Decrease the reliance on third-party payors.

And Hillary is open to the public-option, aka Medicare buy-in.

If you don't like Medicare now, get ready to get raped in the ass by Hillary's plans.
 
Last edited:
KKK Grand Dragons flock to Hillary Clinton.

Americans are flocking to Donald Trump and his message of Putting America First.

There are bad players in all circles, and even Hillary Klanton has her KKK supporters.

I'm from West Virginia and met both Robert Byrd and Jay Rockefeller while they were in the Senate. You should learn a little more about Byrd, the mistakes people make over the course of a 90+ year life, and then decide what is the true definition of atonement. Would I have preferred that Byrd had never joined the KKK? Of course. Do I think that another person in his shoes over the course of his entire Senate career could have done more good for WV? Probably not.

"
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2002/12/what_about_byrd.html

What About Byrd?
142
0
Unlike Thurmond, he renounced his racist past.
By Timothy Noah

Since posting an item pointing out that, contrary to Washington legend, Strom Thurmond never renounced his segregationist past, Chatterbox has been inundated with rude e-mails. The theme of these e-mails is: What about former Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd? Byrd, a Democrat who still represents West Virginia, belonged to the Ku Klux Klan when he was a young man. Past membership in the Klan is heavier moral baggage than past advocacy of segregation. But Byrd, unlike Thurmond, renounced his youthful participation in a racist cause. See, for example, this exchange with CNN's Bernard Shaw in Dec. 1993:

Q: What has been your biggest mistake and your biggest success?

A: Well, it's easy to state what has been my biggest mistake. The greatest mistake I ever made was joining the Ku Klux Klan. And I've said that many times. But one cannot erase what he has done. He can only change his ways and his thoughts. That was an albatross around my neck that I will always wear. You will read it in my obituary that I was a member of the Ku Klux Klan.


Contrast that with an interview Thurmond gave Joseph Stroud of the Charlotte Observer in July 1998 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of his presidential bid on the segregationist Dixiecrat ticket. Asked if he wanted to apologize, Thurmond said, "I don't have anything to apologize for," and "I don't have any regrets." Asked if he thought the Dixiecrats were right, Thurmond said, "Yes, I do." Thurmond said this four years ago!

Chatterbox has not yet received any rude e-mails asking: What about Senate Democrat Ernest Hollings? Hollings ran for governor of South Carolina in 1958 pledging to protect "the Southern way of life," which in those days meant segregation. Once in office, though, Hollings switched sides and supported integration. When Howell Raines of the New York Times asked Hollings in 1983 about his brief career as a segregationist, Hollings didn't just say he knew it was wrong now. He said, "I knew it was wrong" then.

Have Byrd and Hollings atoned sufficiently for their previous views and policies? Probably not. But they have renounced them. Thurmond never will.
"


"
Robert Byrd: KKK Says Late Senator ‘Wasn’t A Klansman Long Enough To Get His Sheet Broke In’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/02/robert-byrd-kkk-says-late_n_633701.html

In the wake of the passing of Sen. Robert Byrd, the Ku Klux Klan, an organization Byrd briefly belonged to, is coming to the defense of the West Virginia Democrat who served in the Senate for 51 years.

The Daily Caller reports:

As politicians and columnists across the country debate the life and legacy of the late Sen. Robert Byrd, the West Virginian’s membership in the Ku Klux Klan has been a sticking point for many. Today’s KKK, though, says Byrd did nothing to warrant such ire.

“He wasn’t a Klansman long enough to get his sheet broke in,” said Travis Pierce, national membership director for the Ku Klux Klan, LLC, one of several groups that uses the KKK name. “It’s much ado about nothing.”


The late Byrd knew that his one-time association with the Klan would remain a part of his life — even after death: “It will be in every obit,” he predicted.

Politico’s David Rogers reports:

By Byrd’s account, opposing civil rights legislation in the ‘60s was his greatest legislative mistake, and he would say his eyes were opened later upon seeing a father unable to get water for his young son when the “colored” drinking fountain wasn’t working. In his later years, he struggled to make amends and getting money to help finish the Martin Luther King Jr. memorial became a passion. And Byrd’s famously close relationship with his black Senate driver, Jim Allen, was part of this transition.

“It’s impossible for anyone to try to whitewash the KKK and its overall symbolism,”said Ken Hechler, a former Democratic congressman from Byrd’s home state. “But at the same time... we honor those people who publicly admit the error of their ways.”
"
 
I'm from West Virginia and met both Robert Byrd and Jay Rockefeller while they were in the Senate. You should learn a little more about Byrd, the mistakes people make over the course of a 90+ year life, and then decide what is the true definition of atonement. Would I have preferred that Byrd had never joined the KKK? Of course. Do I think that another person in his shoes over the course of his entire Senate career could have done more good for WV? Probably not.

Hillary Klanton should publicly disavow Byrd, as well as the modern day KKK Grand Dragon who endorsed Hillary for president.

Here's a classic video of crooked Hillary denigrating African Americans:


Crooked Hillary gets a pass on stereotyping and mocking African Americans for being late, she gets a pass with her dealings with KKK Grand Dragon Robert Byrd, and she gets a pass for not disavowing a modern day KKK Grand Dragon who recently endorsed Hillary.

Apparently Hillary can be racist as hell, but she's a Democrat, so she gets a pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
What is up with her Star Trek outfit she always seem to wear in a variety of colors.
If Trump was a part of all that, you'd hear boos all over. But, it's true, it's ok for Hillary and Bill De Blasio to be a part of it. Sure, it got some press coverage but it quickly went away because he really meant "cautious politician time" lol
 
No matter how you feel about Planned Parenthood, the founder of it, Margaret Sanger, was an avowed white supremacist, who founded the organization to "exterminate" the "negro race".

Hillary praised Margaret Sanger on numerous occasions, yet she still has refused to disavow Margaret Sanger.

Hillary is on the same side as an avowed white supremacist who wanted to exterminate African Americans (among other non-white races).

sanger.jpg


margaret-sanger-jewslatinos-human-weeds.jpg%3Fw%3D599

hillary-clinton-margaret-sanger.png
 
Crooked Hillary also talked about bringing young African American males "to heel" back in the day. She calls young African Americans "superpredators".





Or about Bill and Hillary's racist comments about Obama in 2008, about how Obama was the kind of person who would have been carrying their bags in the years prior.
 
What is up with her Star Trek outfit she always seem to wear in a variety of colors.
If Trump was a part of all that, you'd hear boos all over. But, it's true, it's ok for Hillary and Bill De Blasio to be a part of it. Sure, it got some press coverage but it quickly went away because he really meant "cautious politician time" lol

My favorite is her orange jumpsuit.

hillary-orange-is-the-new-black.jpg

1024x1024.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They are a protected group, due to national origin. Civil Rights Act of 1964. If they are a minority race, they are also protected for that.

Illegal aliens are not, by definition, Mexicans.

Illegal aliens can be of any race and ethnicity.
 
Chfo, glad you have the time to post more stuff. It isn't hard to find dirt on Hillary, it's all over her. Of course, vector and Anne, etc will try to convince you otherwise.
 
KKK Grand Dragons flock to Hillary Clinton.

Americans are flocking to Donald Trump and his message of Putting America First.

There are bad players in all circles, and even Hillary Klanton has her KKK supporters.
Chfo, glad you have the time to post more stuff. It isn't hard to find dirt on Hillary, it's all over her. Of course, vector and Anne, etc will try to convince you otherwise.
Nah. I doubt people change their minds much from the political stuff on this board. I don't expect to convince anyone of anything. I just look at the history of the candidates' actions and word choices and do some evaluating and intuiting. And my impression of them in the end is VERY different than yours. There's no helping judging a person a little who has the same info that I do yet looks at it in such an apparently ill-informed and prejudiced way. And I know other people feel the same about me.

Fortunately for me the vast majority agree with me on this particular issue. And Hillary Clinton's is very well-liked by minorities in general because she's been an advocate for them, not because they're stupid. Donald Trump, not so.

My guess is you're not a minority or a woman. I'm NOT saying you're racist or misogynist. I am saying it makes seeing things the way you do much easier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Is anyone making "Racist, Misogynist, Non-minority for Trump 2016!" bumper stickers yet? If not maybe I'll start. I bet I could retire early selling them to the leftist crowd.

Me? I'm with PGG. I just want a
Gridlock 2016! bumper sticker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Nah. I doubt people change their minds much from the political stuff on this board. I don't expect to convince anyone of anything. I just look at the history of the candidates' actions and word choices and do some evaluating and intuiting. And my impression of them in the end is VERY different than yours. There's no helping judging a person a little who has the same info that I do yet looks at it in such an apparently ill-informed and prejudiced way. And I know other people feel the same about me.

Fortunately for me the vast majority agree with me on this particular issue. And Hillary Clinton's is very well-liked by minorities in general because she's been an advocate for them, not because they're stupid. Donald Trump, not so.

My guess is you're not a minority or a woman. I'm NOT saying you're racist or misogynist. I am saying it makes seeing things the way you do much easier.

As has been said, crooked Hillary has a long and dirty past that the majority of Americans are familiar with. Hence, her untrustworthy numbers are sky-high.

The vast majority of Americans actually sees Hillary for who she is: a corrupt politician who skirts the law to serve her own personal interest.

You are deluding yourself by saying the majority of America is on your side. Hell, half the Democrat voting base disagrees with you! Take a listen at what Bernie and his supporters say about crooked Hillary, and maybe you will see her in a new light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Nah. I doubt people change their minds much from the political stuff on this board. I don't expect to convince anyone of anything. I just look at the history of the candidates' actions and word choices and do some evaluating and intuiting. And my impression of them in the end is VERY different than yours. There's no helping judging a person a little who has the same info that I do yet looks at it in such an apparently ill-informed and prejudiced way. And I know other people feel the same about me.

Fortunately for me the vast majority agree with me on this particular issue. And Hillary Clinton's is very well-liked by minorities in general because she's been an advocate for them, not because they're stupid. Donald Trump, not so.

My guess is you're not a minority or a woman. I'm NOT saying you're racist or misogynist. I am saying it makes seeing things the way you do much easier.

LOL
Your intuition and assessment about where I fall in the demographics is wrong.
That tells me all I needed to know.
I never said Trump was ideal, but I'm simply saying your Hillary is NOT well-liked and is no better than Trump.
 
As has been said, crooked Hillary has a long and dirty past that the majority of Americans are familiar with. Hence, her untrustworthy numbers are sky-high.

The vast majority of Americans actually sees Hillary for who she is: a corrupt politician who skirts the law to serve her own personal interest.

You are deluding yourself by saying the majority of America is on your side. Hell, half the Democrat voting base disagrees with you! Take a listen at what Bernie and his supporters say about crooked Hillary, and maybe you will see her in a new light.

Women across America are proving that they are well in tuned to the issues and aren't just voting for a candidate who is a woman. They are voting for who they believe is the best candidate according to their own ideologies and belief system. Bernie is definitely giving Hillary a run for her money in the women vote, and he should be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'll likely consider the third party candidate if Trump starts taking big business donor money. If he does, then he will be no different than Hillary (just a bigger blow hard with goofy hair).
 
No matter how you feel about Planned Parenthood, the founder of it, Margaret Sanger, was an avowed white supremacist, who founded the organization to "exterminate" the "negro race".

Hillary praised Margaret Sanger on numerous occasions, yet she still has refused to disavow Margaret Sanger.

Hillary is on the same side as an avowed white supremacist who wanted to exterminate African Americans (among other non-white races).

sanger.jpg


margaret-sanger-jewslatinos-human-weeds.jpg%3Fw%3D599

hillary-clinton-margaret-sanger.png

You do realize that those were the public views at the time, right? The reason Ivy League universities switched from an entrance exam to today's interview system, back in the 30's or so, was exactly because a lot of these "undesirables" got in on merit.

There is still no entrance exam, by the way, in America. ;)

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12

P.S. Stop saying "crooked", because you just sound like Trump's mouthpiece or a bully, or both, and people will just stop having monologues with you. I don't like HRC, but I hate bullies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'll likely consider the third party candidate if Trump starts taking big business donor money. If he does, then he will be no different than Hillary (just a bigger blow hard with goofy hair).
It's the system. When it costs 600 million to get elected as POTUS, there is no way anybody clean can make it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top