Another question regarding letters of recommendation here 🙁
I've done research in two labs. One was three years ago, and one was this last semester. I had no problem obtaining a letter from my recent lab supervisor, but my supervisor from three years ago has been uncooperative as far as responding to my attempts to get in touch with him. I called Harvard about a month ago, and the lady I spoke with told me to write send a letter to Harvard explaining my situation. The purpose of the letter is just so that they have something on file. When I asked her if the absence of that one letter would hurt my chances of admission, she replied confidently with a "not at all."
Paranoid and wondering if there were others in the admissions office who shared her opinion, I called again last Friday. I spoke with a man that time, and he mentioned nothing about sending Harvard a letter. He said that it is in "my best interest" to obtain the letter from my supervisor, as if I didn't know that already. I asked if it would hurt my chances of admission, and he said rather apathetically that he didn't know.
So I called again today. Another guy answered. He was friendlier, but his answers were identical to those of the man I spoke with on Friday.
Should I go ahead and send Harvard a letter? Also, and I don't think anyone here is qualified to answer but I'll ask anyway, do you think not having that letter will hurt me?
I guess my post here is more of a chance to complain. It seems pretty presumptuous of Harvard to mandate exactly who you receive some letters from. Don't they know that some research supervisors can be impossible to work with/get in contact with? Even my research under that supervisor was largely independent. Then again, they're setting rules for their own school, and nobody said I had to apply.
Meh.