- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 73,040
- Reaction score
- 119,100
Oh is that who you are?? I was convinced you were lawpy...Zenge (that’s me)
Oh is that who you are?? I was convinced you were lawpy...Zenge (that’s me)
I said earlier today. I am feeling slightly better about him for reasons I cannot explain.How are you feeling about Mel?
Yeah no. I felt like it didn’t need any explanation in the first post because duh! That info is right in post #1. But then low and behold the 2 players I have voted for this cycle decided they had a “gotcha moment”.Where did I ever say that? I did that exact calculation on an earlier page.
But your use of that statistic didn't really match the context for your other statement, in my opinion. It kinda looks to me like you went back later to find an explanation because someone noticed it was sketchy and you can't edit it.
I don’t even know what this references. And I’m not angry right now. I’m just seeing the manufactured sus from you.You definitely have done something similar as a wolf in the past and you got equally angry at me for pointing out "right wolf wrong (?) reason"... although I maintain that time it was not a wrong reason.
Well from my end, I’m actually out more effort into this game than the last one. Maybe because the village was more solid last time. Or maybe because I died night 1I dunno Sunny. Overall you just seem to be giving explanations for your logic in this game that I am really not following. Last time -- when you were a villager -- I saw a lot more driving energy from you and I agreed with a lot of your posts. This game you seem to be expending way more energy acting rankled about people nitpicking your words instead of spending that energy looking for wolves.
As did I. And still do.I interpreted your post as claiming that it was TMI for sunny to say there were 80% villagers, implying you had forgotten there was an open setup
Lottttta jokes and "hey fellow villagersOh is that who you are?? I was convinced you were lawpy...
Ok well... that is just wrongYeah no. I felt like it didn’t need any explanation in the first post because duh! That info is right in post #1.
As did I. And still do.
Yeah, that's the impression I got initially too and I was also confused but with explanation it makes more senseNope, not what I was saying at all, and also not how I interpreted the post she made.
It sounded like she said 2/3 of the people voting for the leading wagons were villagers. And I don't know how she would know that particular statistic.
I mean maybe I'm a dummy but it seems strange to me to extrapolate a game-wide breakdown -- and not even the right one (2/3 ≠ 80%, last time I checked) to a specific voting set. How does she know all 3 wolves weren't on the genny vote, for example? Idk it just struck me as kinda weird.
Although to be transparent, Sporty "hmmm" reacting my popcorn emoji also felt weird to me, so. 🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️
I don’t have a read on mkg but given that 80% of the roster was village for yeet 1, I could buy that she really was completely uninformed at all and didn’t want to risk voting a villager. Not because of how a vote on the villager would be perceived, but because she could contribute to/cause the loss of a villager blindly.
...what
How is that confusing? It’s an open setup game. All 15 players were still alive before yeet 1. 12 out of 15 are village. 12/15= 0.8=80% village
Wth would you need popcorn for that? Seems weird you’re trying to make it into something more than it is.
Yeah but it’s not just when he knows stuff others don’t. He himself thinks in elaborate ways that aren’t always helpful because no one else is doing that so what he thinks other people are doing isn’t accurate.
I too like to use math to try to cover up sketchy statements I can't edit. Looks professional!
Guys this is literal open set up. There are no 3P.
which reminds me, further strengthening my Pippy sus..... she has used this game setup argument any time someone gets a whiff that she could maybe might be 3P, but “suddenly” she doesn’t know how a villager could know there were 80% villagers at the start of the game.
Where did I ever say that? I did that exact calculation on an earlier page.
But your use of that statistic didn't really match the context for your other statement, in my opinion. It kinda looks to me like you went back later to find an explanation because someone noticed it was sketchy and you can't edit it.
You definitely have done something similar as a wolf in the past and you got equally angry at me for pointing out "right wolf wrong (?) reason"... although I maintain that time it was not a wrong reason.
I dunno Sunny. Overall you just seem to be giving explanations for your logic in this game that I am really not following. Last time -- when you were a villager -- I saw a lot more driving energy from you and I agreed with a lot of your posts. This game you seem to be expending way more energy acting rankled about people nitpicking your words instead of spending that energy looking for wolves.
I never said anything you’re saying I did. And yeah 2/3 doesn’t equal 80. But now you’re erecting straw men saying I was referencing “leading wagons” and then later in the same post saying I was referencing people voting Genny, pick a lie pip. I was referring to the entire roster. And btw while making a comment about a third party to a different third party. None of this was the crux of any decision making.Nope, not what I was saying at all, and also not how I interpreted the post she made.
It sounded like she said 2/3 of the people voting for the leading wagons were villagers. And I don't know how she would know that particular statistic.
I mean maybe I'm a dummy but it seems strange to me to extrapolate a game-wide breakdown -- and not even the right one (2/3 ≠ 80%, last time I checked) to a specific voting set. How does she know all 3 wolves weren't on the genny vote, for example? Idk it just struck me as kinda weird.
Although to be transparent, Sporty "hmmm" reacting my popcorn emoji also felt weird to me, so. 🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️
Who’s impression and explanation are you referring to here?Yeah, that's the impression I got initially too and I was also confused but with explanation it makes more sense
Thank you for pulling all of the relevant quotes and putting them into one post. I was also confused and I interpreted it in a similar way to how Pippy did. I think I understand what you’re saying now, but I was confused for a bit thereI never said anything you’re saying I did. And yeah 2/3 doesn’t equal 80. But now you’re erecting straw men saying I was referencing “leading wagons” and then later in the same post saying I was referencing people voting Genny, pick a lie pip. I was referring to the entire roster. And btw while making a comment about a third party to a different third party. None of this was the crux of any decision making.
Not any better. There’s been nothing today that makes me want to give Bread village cred. He’s walked back his read of me in a wishy-washy kind of way, mostly for defending sunny, but then is also suspicious of sunny.How do you feel about his D2 posts? Not asking for a full iso unless you want to, just point me to posts you’ve already talked about them if you have
Not sure how I feel about targeting Dubz because I am not sure when she is driving back home but will definitely start looking into her after looking at Sunshine and Mel. So far Mel has not really pinged me though but rereads always help.
Like does some of it kind of track, logically? Sure. But overall, like these are kind of the most comprehensive reads we’ve gotten. Kind of sort of back tracking on me. And looking kind of sort of looking into Sunny and Mel, but not really committed to Mel as a potential candidate. And will maybe look at Dubz later.Although this does make me feel a little better about Zenge because when we wolfed together last game he did point out that Sunny can be an easy misyeet. At the moment I think I might interpret this as more village unless he is a wolf trying to save Sunny for a future misyeet(I feel like this may be more suspicious if he does this though because that would be back tracking)
No fun police up in hereLottttta jokes and "hey fellow villagerswolf focus group, what do you think about this pack?" posts coming from your direction today
Not gonna lie I have no idea where you got 2/3 from nor how you interpreted her post as saying anything about the wagon compositionNope, not what I was saying at all, and also not how I interpreted the post she made.
It sounded like she said 2/3 of the people voting for the leading wagons were villagers. And I don't know how she would know that particular statistic.
I mean maybe I'm a dummy but it seems strange to me to extrapolate a game-wide breakdown -- and not even the right one (2/3 ≠ 80%, last time I checked) to a specific voting set. How does she know all 3 wolves weren't on the genny vote, for example? Idk it just struck me as kinda weird.
Although to be transparent, Sporty "hmmm" reacting my popcorn emoji also felt weird to me, so. 🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️
“given that 80% of the roster was village for yeet 1”For anyone who isn’t trying to twist everything I do to manufacture a case against me, please explain in what world “80% of the roster” could be interpreted as “80% the leading wagons” or “80% of the votes on genny’s wagon”
How can I possibly know what is inside your head? I might have read it wrong, but that's how I read it. It's NOT a lie for me to say "this is how I interpreted your post." It's my own opinion.I never said anything you’re saying I did. And yeah 2/3 doesn’t equal 80. But now you’re erecting straw men saying I was referencing “leading wagons” and then later in the same post saying I was referencing people voting Genny, pick a lie pip. I was referring to the entire roster. And btw while making a comment about a third party to a different third party. None of this was the crux of any decision making.
The first time I read your 80% thing, I thought you meant like 80% of the people on the leading vote were village with the way you said "was village for yeet 1." That did not make sense though so I kept reading and now it does make sense and I understand what you meantWho’s impression and explanation are you referring to here?
Honestly I don't even know where I got that number, because I thought that's what she said but people can't edit posts, so I guess I misread it.Not gonna lie I have no idea where you got 2/3 from nor how you interpreted her post as saying anything about the wagon composition
The context was mkg saying she literally knew nothing and was worried about RNG and hitting a villager by voting blindly on the *entire eligible voting pool* which includes the entire roster. And why I said “for yeet 1”? Because there were 2 deaths since that time, and that was the situation that was being discussed.“given that 80% of the roster was village for yeet 1”
I’m pretty sure I skipped some words when I was reading over this sentence. Because I thought it said something along the lines of 80% of the people going to get a yeet and not 80% of the people like overall in the game on day one overall are village
Do you think Mel is wolfy or are you just seeing what happens if you put a vote there?I think that I am going to go with
###Vote Mel###
to shake it up a bit. Not really feeling wolfy vibes from Alley. Still looking at Zenge a little but I feel a little bit better about him and also feel like he would jump to the fact that my vote could be seen as more of a retaliatory vote.
I'm less concerned by the joking, more concerned by the "hey y'all who should we vote next" approach.No fun police up in here
I have posted far more content than my single post asking what people thought about a sunny/bread pack.
Exactly.Not gonna lie I have no idea where you got 2/3 from nor how you interpreted her post as saying anything about the wagon composition
Bread you’re mystery behind the scenes searches and decision making process aren’t really helping. You just kinda name random people in your posts and never really follow up with substance.I think that I am going to go with
###Vote Mel###
to shake it up a bit. Not really feeling wolfy vibes from Alley. Still looking at Zenge a little but I feel a little bit better about him and also feel like he would jump to the fact that my vote could be seen as more of a retaliatory vote.
Well wasn’t it you who didn’t want to give people a pass for routine IRL stuff like driving and work?Honestly I don't even know where I got that number, because I thought that's what she said but people can't edit posts, so I guess I misread it.
I was in the clinic for 10 hours today trying to answer rapid fire on-the-spot questions about experimental chemo protocols 🤷🏼♀️
She said she doesn’t want it used as a reason on its own not to vote for someone, not that it can never explain why someone misread somethingWell wasn’t it you who didn’t want to give people a pass for routine IRL stuff like driving and work?
Curious about this because you were just thinking Dubz might be woof?Also @WildZoo I hate your April read & I'm mildly worried that Zenge may be trying to pocket you by mimicking your reads list.
For VOTING THEM.Well wasn’t it you who didn’t want to give people a pass for routine IRL stuff like driving and work?
I have her smack dab in the middle of neutral right now and I don't want to bite the dust before I got that icky feeling on record.Curious about this because you were just thinking Dubz might be woof?
Honestly I'd be more concerned about Dubz being wolf than Zenge if we were thinking w/v with them. I feel like I can't get a good read of Dubz until it comes down to panic time towards the later half of a game.I have her smack dab in the middle of neutral right now and I don't want to bite the dust before I got that icky feeling on record.
Where did I even say that? I can't remember the last time I didn't ask for other people's opinions when I'm forming reads and packs. What's the point in having village reads if I can't ask for their opinions on stuff?I'm less concerned by the joking, more concerned by the "hey y'all who should we vote next" approach.
Feels touchy feely like friendly neighborhood wolf Dubz.
You didn't say that. It's just a feeling I got from your posts today.Where did I even say that? I can't remember the last time I didn't ask for other people's opinions when I'm forming reads and packs. What's the point in having village reads if I can't ask for their opinions on stuff?
You wanna like, ask WZ this or look at her posts maybe?How is WZ reading April?
Well I'm voting for her soHow is WZ reading April?
Not sure the correlation between mkg and I, and between the slow votes and either of us. In fact, wouldn’t it be more likely the pack would control the board since everyone is so spread out but we’re the leading wagons?I also feel like either mkg or sunshine is wolf because votes are moving like molasses today & there is a very wide split right now.
I think vis described well in this post how I’m feeling about MKG as wellVote mkg
I’m stuck on how her posts sound like struggling-to-catch-up wolf
WolfyHow is WZ reading April?
Well in that case, I agree with your read. 🙂Well I'm voting for her so
She like, answered me.You wanna like, ask WZ this or look at her posts maybe?
Not if both of you are wolves, no.Not sure the correlation between mkg and I, and between the slow votes and either of us. In fact, wouldn’t it be more likely the pack would control the board since everyone is so spread out but we’re the leading wagons?
3 people could control the board when the highest votes are 2 on us.Not if both of you are wolves, no.
Wolves don't have high numbers in the first place in this game so I don't know why you keep bringing up the idea that 3 people can control this situation. They can't all vote together every time -- that's wolf suicide.