- Joined
- May 9, 2010
- Messages
- 368
- Reaction score
- 20
Not all schools have +/-. The reason C- cut-off is dumb is a 70% at a +/- school is a C- while the same 70% at another school is a solid C. Good point Also, 70% isn't failing. The arbitrary designation that C- is automatically worse than C doesn't make any sense. Where I went to school, a C- was considered failing because it resulted in a sub-2.0. I was under the impression that this was the general practice.
Also, as far as the rest of your post goes, why take someone who gets <25 on the MCAT when 25 is the average of all test takers? "C" is generally considered an average grade, so C- is below average. Can't take people with a below average grade, but you can take people with below average MCAT scores? Doesn't make sense.Fair enough. Personally I think more emphasis should be put on the MCAT since it is a standardized test whereas the course curves vary greatly from school to school. Good points.
Edit: Anyway, the point I was making is that DO schools having a more holistic process is bogus. Yes, DO schools have lower GPA/MCAT cutoffs than MD schools, but they also disqualify applicants for many more insignificant reasons (C- in a single pre-req, no DO shadowing, no DO/MD LOR, good reason for wanting to be a physician but not for wanting to be a DO specifically) than MD schools do. IMO having specific automatic disqualifiers is the polar opposite of "holistic".
I agree. Neither MD or DO is more holistic than the other in my opinion. Good points. I need to get out of the library more. I'm not thinking outside of my little box as much as I used to.
Also, as far as the rest of your post goes, why take someone who gets <25 on the MCAT when 25 is the average of all test takers? "C" is generally considered an average grade, so C- is below average. Can't take people with a below average grade, but you can take people with below average MCAT scores? Doesn't make sense.Fair enough. Personally I think more emphasis should be put on the MCAT since it is a standardized test whereas the course curves vary greatly from school to school. Good points.
Edit: Anyway, the point I was making is that DO schools having a more holistic process is bogus. Yes, DO schools have lower GPA/MCAT cutoffs than MD schools, but they also disqualify applicants for many more insignificant reasons (C- in a single pre-req, no DO shadowing, no DO/MD LOR, good reason for wanting to be a physician but not for wanting to be a DO specifically) than MD schools do. IMO having specific automatic disqualifiers is the polar opposite of "holistic".
I agree. Neither MD or DO is more holistic than the other in my opinion. Good points. I need to get out of the library more. I'm not thinking outside of my little box as much as I used to.