- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 19,162
- Reaction score
- 29,474
Unless our seer is now a wolf...
Unless our seer is now a wolf...
Where you at, @killerleaf ? You must have stories to tell of the other side.
That's what I was wondering...
She also said she was having surgery yesterday soShe may still be asleep it's not even 7AM on west coast
Ya that'll do itShe also said she was having surgery yesterday so
Unless our seer is now a wolf...
I'm at least pretty sure about it. Unless she's a wolf and a different wolf has that ability and told her to use that as her defense.But are we really sure what she told us is the truth?
I'm at least pretty sure about it. Unless she's a wolf and a different wolf has that ability and told her to use that as her defense.
She DID say that she gave someone a protector item, so maybe that person believed her too, because they got the item, and then and used it on her.I was thinking kittens would get killed overnight if they were telling the truth, so I am interested to hear what they say today.
She DID say that she gave someone a protector item, so maybe that person believed her too, because they got the item, and then and used it on her.
She DID say that she gave someone a protector item, so maybe that person believed her too, because they got the item, and then and used it on her.
I can barely hoot anymore.Her resolve was set: no more of that crazed hooting.
I have known all along, that I am a target ... a huge target of the killer wolves.
I'm leaning towards DrS as a villager too@Doctor-S, do you have any idea why raf might have been trying to kill you? I'm not saying it's true, but there were hints in the write-up suggesting that. I'm still leaning toward you being a villager, so I'm wondering why she did that?
Or at least a not-wolfI'm leaning towards DrS as a villager too
I have been targeted by killer wolves (and deathly assassins such as raf) because I am a GOOD villager, who lives a life filled with love, happiness, peace and truth.@Doctor-S, do you have any idea why raf might have been trying to kill you? I'm not saying it's true, but there were hints in the write-up suggesting that. I'm still leaning toward you being a villager, so I'm wondering why she did that?
IF she was even responsible for one of the other kills...I don't know. It said she could attempt to kill 2 performers so if she were going after DrS, then she was responsible for only one other kill
You're right it's IF. I was walking between terminals while trying to think and type. My bad. It's also odd raf went after DrS after deciding a vote to lynch DrS wasn't the right choice.IF she was even responsible for one of the other kills...
Potentially someone (like kmittz because of her role reveal) was targeted last night but was protected and it just wasn't in the write up. (But this is just if the wolves get 2 kills but who knows)
But are we really sure what she told us is the truth?
I was thinking kittens would get killed overnight if they were telling the truth, so I am interested to hear what they say today.
1. kmitz is a wolf. I don't think so. She is very consistent if you read through her posts (got abilities and items confused when Dr's said she was attacked - most people thought the protection came from an ability except her. She thought it was an item because she could give that item out)
2. The wolves didn't target her hoping we would see that and think she's a wolf and lynch her today.
3. She was targeted and then protected by someone.
1. kmitz is a wolf. I don't think so. She is very consistent if you read through her posts (got abilities and items confused when Dr's said she was attacked - most people thought the protection came from an ability except her. She thought it was an item because she could give that item out)
2. The wolves didn't target her hoping we would see that and think she's a wolf and lynch her today.
3. She was targeted and then protected by someone.
IF she was even responsible for one of the other kills...
Potentially someone (like kmittz because of her role reveal) was targeted last night but was protected and it just wasn't in the write up. (But this is just if the wolves get 2 kills but who knows)
Good thought!4. They didn't kill her because she could give an item to them since she doesn't know who's a wolf
(Okay now gone til later)
I have sent out two items, one was the ability to see anothers affiliation and the other was a protection.
I mean, I'm not sure that's the greatest idea to force it out of someone. It would put a target on someone's back if the person seered is a villager because then the wolves would know that.So the question is (and I don't think it gives anything away because it was a one time item use, not a nightly ability), who got the affiliation item and what did they see?
Before anyone answers, can we get a consensus that there's nothing to lose from exposing this info? We will know for certain if kittens was lying or telling the truth, and we will know for certain if one of the characters (who was seered) is a villager or wolf.
This all assumes, of course, that the person with the seer item tells the truth. There's no accounting for that.
So the question is (and I don't think it gives anything away because it was a one time item use, not a nightly ability), who got the affiliation item and what did they see?
Before anyone answers, can we get a consensus that there's nothing to lose from exposing this info? We will know for certain if kittens was lying or telling the truth, and we will know for certain if one of the characters (who was seered) is a villager or wolf.
This all assumes, of course, that the person with the seer item tells the truth. There's no accounting for that.
I mean, I'm not sure that's the greatest idea to force it out of someone. It would put a target on someone's back if the person seered is a villager because then the wolves would know that.
Don't the wolves know who the villagers are anyway? I.e. everyone but themselves?I mean, I'm not sure that's the greatest idea to force it out of someone. It would put a target on someone's back if the person seered is a villager because then the wolves would know that.
I agree with that, I can share both items and where they went if there's a consensus on that.
I agree.Wolves already have more info than the villagers, so I think keeping most info under wraps might be a better strategy. What does everybody else think?
I mean, I'm not sure that's the greatest idea to force it out of someone. It would put a target on someone's back if the person seered is a villager because then the wolves would know that.
Right, we're all worried about revealing any special abilities we may or may not have, as some (such as a seer or, sorry kittens, an items maker) are bigger targets than, say, a protector. That's why this is a good chance to get some info without any new role reveals.Don't the wolves know who the villagers are anyway? I.e. everyone but themselves?
But is it not still somewhat of a role reveal?Right, we're all worried about revealing any special abilities we may or may not have, as some (such as a seer or, sorry kittens, an items maker) are bigger targets than, say, a protector. That's why this is a good chance to get some info without any new role reveals.
I agree, it's inappropriate to force anyone out of the closet. They should only come forward, of their own accord, if they feel safe doing so.I really don't think this is a good idea at the moment. If someone thinks it's valuable that they reveal that they received an item, just let them do it. I don't think you should explicitly reveal where you have sent items.
But is it not still somewhat of a role reveal?
I agree, it's inappropriate to force anyone out of the closet. They should only come forward, of their own accord, if they feel safe doing so.