Although we all have different criteria to judge MPH schools on with regards to where to attend . . . I would include in my list things like having a program that "failed" (of which there were complaints from NYU CC MPH students here and elsewhere not too many years ago), the perceived reputation and many other factors . . . you have to use something when you look at different schools I would say. Also, I don' t know what "against the grain" means for NYU, certainly faculty at NYU and elsewhere probably felt that NYU CC program was unethical. Here is a snipe of a complaint from just a few years ago:
As a family member of a student in this program, these complaints are completely valid and understated. There were many other problems not mentioned that have arisen. Tuition was supposed to include all meals while overseas. That turned out to be five dinners a week (down from the promised 21). Clean drinking water is not provided. Housing was to be at NYU housing, it is not, comprising the safety and security of the students. Classes were far below masters level. As someone with a PhD I disagree with some of the commenters and feel that a masters program should teach you the fundamentals of the subject matter you are studying, something NYU has regrettably failed to do. My family member in this program may leave with three new letters behind their name but they will graduate with no new knowledge, applicable skills, or valuable public health experience. Additionally, many students have voiced their concerns but were either punished for retaliation or blatantly ignored which has ensured that future open discussion about program improvements will not be held.
Fair enough . . . but you just go to one public health school in a lifetime, and if that happens in the next few years, (versus decades), many applicants want to go to the school which is good
now, not which might have rehabilitated itself in a decade or more. I don't think this is a case of, "NYU needs emotional and financial support now, come be a student and help us build up our reputation!"
It seems like the controversial NYU campus in the UAE is still operating and it has a recent controversial past:
The Labor Abuse That Went Into NYU’s Abu Dhabi Campus. NYU exploited migrant workers, they certainly wouldn't be above exploiting MPH students who are at the bottom of the totem pole, the school has a "business model" which it's first goal isn't typical for a university such as research or education.
I think that you might be giving NYU too much credit they had severe problems with the practicum in Ghana:
- The fall semester also includes 180 hours of field work in the form of a practicum, or internship. Do not be fooled -- these are not internships as you understand them to be. NYU and UG are laughably unorganized in their orchestration of these practicums. We have been here for 7 weeks and there are students who still have not started, students whose internships cancelled on them, students who were not allowed to use the restroom or eat while at work, students who sit for 5-8 hours a day doing nothing because their internship sites do not have work for them to do. I understand this might even be a violation of the CEPH Accreditation standards. The organizations are ill prepared for and/or unable to accommodate interns, but NYU will attempt to sell you on what an "incredible opportunity" they are, and the "insight" you will gain at work.
My first impression when somebody (anybody) is trying to advertise a school is that they often advertise the opposite of what the negative and real impression is. There is a whole "fit for the program" mythology at many programs, that they want special students, of the course the dean would say something positive, but we know from recent history and what reporters have said about NYU is that the school went crazy with growth and charging high tuition for questionable academic activities. I think that NYU is also still trying to recruit numbers!
Of course NYU is going to make general statements that don't have details like "changes across the board" were made. But jeez, the person who posted on Reddit went on about how if in the accelerated CC MPH program if you wanted to party abroad for a year and not study that is the program for you! I've met people who felt that the MPH degree was more about teaching you, "a way of thinking" versus learning hard facts or skills and they seemed pretty . . . nebulous and didn't display critical thinking skills, at least to me, and they weren't exactly working in a public health field after school. I think hard skills are important, as are critical thinking skills, with some many options available for an MPH for probably most students, why go to NYU?
I think NYU is like BU, a new-ish sort of public health school that wants to "grow" their reputation and whom really ramped up the student population the last decade while sacrificing making sure the education is quality, same complaints at BU, a watered down curriculum. BU is pretty much a non-visible school outside of boston in a lot of ways, they wanted admitted students to sell the school and somehow increase their reputation so they can get higher profile students, so they aren't focused on their current students, like a monkey always looking higher up for the next branch they don't care who they're standing on right now. BU pushes students ridiculously hard to be cheerleaders for the school, but offers less in terms of a practicum or post-graduation assistance, I wouldn't be surprised if NYU is the same way. Your education is too important to be caught-up in advertising for the next year's crop.