Long post to follow... may have gone overboard with the quotes and computer was lagging a lot!
@ziggyandjazzy is on my top contender list. Came out quick acting sassy in her posts then defensive.
You don't wanna talk about statistics but you did a RNG vote?? Not sure I get that
Why does anyone lynch anyone? Seems pretty straightforward to me
Lol you're going to be asking for a long time to get AM to be less question-y and vague as hell
You think my post seems weird but not mutts'?
Pip, AM, and mutts are sparking my feels
Cuz I put hashtags and lynch in front of your name
Initially lynched AM, was very reluctant in conversing with AM, due to her questioning and game play tactics (limited answers, etc).
You haven't played every game I have. I've played this way before. And lol @aggressive I get that too much irl
I get quickly irritated with AM's play. I don't really like answering her questions because I don't think it is beneficial.
No I don't find her questions helpful because she asks a bunch of other people and never provides answers to other people's questions. I have no problem answering and asking questions, that's all part of the game. It's how she does it.
How is that more beneficial? You going to "force a lynch"?
No she won't. She hasn't answered me. I don't need to tailor my questions to suit her needs. Just like I don't need to answer her.
Dunno why people have so much resistance to this, when most other people's votes don't have much weight behind them, if any at all
You want me to just keep quoting your responses back to you? I really don't understand but this is annoying AF per usual
Then unlynches AM to lynch Stagg, when she is called out.
Ugh I'm on mobile but this is really too easy.
##unlynch am
Lynch stagg##
Then switches vote again from Stagg to Pip, only after realizing Mutts also lynched Stagg via RNG (she didn’t like that). Only reasoning for lynching Pip, thus far, is all her fluff and doesn’t trust her (but why??)
Well now that you say that it makes me feel bad
Also didn't realize mutts was voting for Stagg I don't like that
###unlynch Stagg
Lynch pip###
Became defensive again, when called out for quick responses that others have already asked (didn’t really need to respond defensively IMO)
Huh? Did you not see my post to you earlier? I'm playing on my phone with poor internet. Things don't load quickly.
Guess my time where I don't post will happen earlier this game.
Now that the lynches are stacking up on her, she is backtracking her defensiveness
I know you aren't but you're the mom I need to give me a kick in the butt. Idk what I'm doing. Clearly something wrong. I voted for her because of the fluff and bc I don't trust her.
Clearly everyone's just going to be a sheeple to AM *yawn*
I HIGHLY suggest you look elsewhere.
Only person who’s voting has been all over the place today…
Are you trying to play coy?
@cubsrule4e
what did he mean by profile pic may mean more that what it appears? What more can you tell us?
It may be more important than you think...
NAV
Seems knowledgeable in the game itself, trying to understand how SDNers play by throwing out stats and old game references. Interested to see how it plays out with them.
(I apologize if this is out of order, I am going by the search results to "WW" order)
Ireland: Wolf vote and first post
Anatomy Lab Speed: Wolf vote and first post
Bad Apple: First post by wolf
Back to the basics: hiker: First post by Wolf (who conveniently was also Stayingpositive)
Noob game: Neither
Colorado WW: Both first post and first vote
Scientifically WW: First vote
WW at a Wedding - Auto convert posted first and voted first, not sure if they knew they would auto convert though
Smash bros - First vote by "other"
Back to basics: cycling - Neither (was AM)
First vote: 6/10 (1 being other)
First post: 6/10
I am going to cut off there for now, take from that what you will, and go more into reading how people play the game. But I will take greater than 50% on a day one vote.
@SARdoghandler from what I’ve noticed seems to be a good wolf hunter (could be wrong as I have not played many games nor seen many). Seems to be defending AM’s game play, are you just looking out for her in general or believe she’s could be village?
AM will always answer questions when asked in a correct way. You may not like her answers, but she always does.
It is always helpful to village to share on thread why you are voting for someone, especially when asked specifically to do so. Full stop.
I find you need to ask AM very specific questions because she will always directly answer your exact question. For example, asking "why did you vote for x", she will sometimes reply with "because I felt like it". This is, in fact, a valid answer. So thinking about what I may want from AM, I would ask something more like "What about x's play so far has you voting for them?". Even then, you may still not get an answer that is as forthcoming as you would like, but it's useless to complain that AM 'doesn't answer questions'. She does answer the question, or she will say that she doesn't want to answer, but people just don't like the answers.
Then you'll either have to rephrase your questions, or realize that your method of asking will not yield results. "Not tailoring" your questions feels pretty resistant for a game where we need to work together. There is a certain element of mutual respect and effort that needs to go in if you expect to get it in return.
Computer has been super slow and that took forever to round up the excessive amount of quotes lol.
So I can say where my vote is going tonight
Lynch ziggy
I left off on page 6 of the thread, so I’ll keep reading and update as needed.
