But yet, our match list is lackluster every year compared to other schools. I understand it is student based, but more students would go into competitive specialties if they were more prepared. To be honest, the curriculum has to be changed (and I think they're working on it) because we do awfully poor compared to most other osteopathic schools in terms of first time pass rates for COMLEX I.
I think we're told constantly, "Well, you're from PCOM so you'll do OK." This is no longer as true as it once was. The cream of the crop usually gets the best placement, programs, etc.
Obviously there is variation, but for one of the oldest osteopathic schools our academics are subpar compared to many other schools.
I definitely agree with this. There are some systems that are very weak in terms of board prep and clinical applications, and I think with KFD and others implementing a new structure and revising the weaknesses, there will be a lot of improvement. There already has been for the class of 2015. I do wish it had been there from the beginning of first year.
But my advice to new students at any program is that despite what flaws your curriculum may have, it is inevitably up to you to make the most of your education. Be proactive on shadowing, research opportunities, etc. If professors are giving you the questions and answers to their portion of the exam because they want you to actively listen to what they have to say, don't sell your self short by not reviewing all of the material or not finding a text that has the information. Be careful when looking at pass rates for boards, because some schools screen who can and can't take the exam and/or provide a COMSAE a couple months before which may deter students who could have failed from taking it (I don't necessarily think that this is a bad thing!). I do think PCOM's pass rate in the past has reflected flaws in the curriculum, but I can tell you that only you can ultimately control your boards score. Be careful with match lists, because ultimately it is student dependent on which programs they decide to apply for and how they rank their programs. But just because it is student dependent doesn't mean it is not a weak match list. In the end, you are responsible for yourself. I want my peers to do well, but to be honest I don't particularly care where everyone else matches, I care where I will match. It is nice to see students landing competitive programs because it gives you insight that your institution may be preparing you well.
I think you have to look at a program as a whole. Where do you feel the most comfortable? Are you a student that needs a little more direction? Because if you are, you may want to stay away from curriculums that are weaker or schools with lower pass rates, or new programs. If you function pretty independent, you will be fine wherever you go if you work at it. PCOM does have a great reputation and I still do think that it is a benefit. I have heard from multiple attendings how impressed they are with our students and that we have strong clinical skills and a lot of confidence (most of them MDs). Reputation will not rise you above weak grades, weak board scores, or a weak performance, but I do think it is an asset in general.
Maybe i'm just too optimistic, but I would choose PCOM a second time.
and btw - I think the biggest flaw at PCOM is the lack of direction and organization during 3rd and 4th year with rotations and residency apps, but again, be proactive and you can turn it into a better experience. I've heard a lot of horror stories from a lot of other schools in the area and a few other DO schools as well, so I'm not sure that this is just a PCOM thing. I have definitely complained a lot since last January about rotation related issues. Oh - the financial aid department also tends to be a little disorganized, so make sure you are on top of everything and make sure all forms are received.