- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 70,796
- Reaction score
- 116,097
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm sketchIs no one considering that Mixy could have been provided a cover role?
So then why say it? Because I don't think anybody was unlynching her based on her role name...No freakin clue
More sketch
Incorrect use of WIFOMKC popping in first thing but not saying much or voting came off as odd
BBC also popped in early and then poofed outta here, but I've never played with her so idk
But those are just WIFOM. I can't really do reads on people who haven't checked in.
Reading through, really wish I hadn't been attempting to sleep. Could no one figure out that using literally any ability on Mixy would have sufficed? If someone got back results on her that didn't align with a commuter role, boom, lynch. If they got back results that seemed to fit with her claim, they could very well keep quiet unless it was necessary to reveal, just like a seer would if they seered someone village. It's not that hard.What makes me hesitant is that to clear her someone else has to vouch that they used an action, which makes them a target even if they don't reveal what ability they have.
My feels weren't very solid to begin with but I don't love the role reveal. I am leaning towards trusting it (or at least letting it be) for now, but I want to find a better candidate before I switch. I'll catch up more thoroughly and see if I feel the same.
Which part of my logic were you disagreeing with? I remember you responding to one of my posts, and the logic you assumed I was using wasn't actually an argument I had made.Personally, I'm most suspicious of WildZoo at this time. I'm sort-of the opposite of jboo - I think one of the wolves got on the thread early to try and push opinion. It's weak, but out of the early leaders, cray and WildZoo were the ones whose logic I disagreed with most, and I think part of my read on Cray is posting style.
I do typically agree with this, just because it's better play in my opinion. But villagers who feel they don't have other options and are pressed for time tend to jump to role reveal. Especially on d1.I'm saying she took a last ditch attempt (role reveal should always be dead last defense), commented on the people voting for her, role revealed, and that's it. I'm saying there was a lack of effort on her part and I don't like it.
Can we stop lynching people because we disagree with their playstyle please? Kind of hypocritical coming from you, cray.If it feels retaliatory, I'm not surprised. There is a little heat behind my vote here. Not sure I like Mixy's style, frankly. I think her interactions with DVMD and others is not only reactive, counterproductive, arrogant, but also a bit too pushy and without good logic in my view, which I stated earlier about her reaction to DVMD.
Don't extrapolate your meta to other people's. Villagers run the village all the time. Sometimes they run it right into the ground, but run it they do.Villagers can get a bit pushy, yes. I know in my case, I feel at my pushiest as a wolf. It never sits right for me to see a "villager" trying to run the village. I could be wrong on that gut feel, but it is a red flag in my book.