Yes to what? I don’t understand what you are saying? What are these dates? I’m fine with certain areas ending restrictions now if they go into that decision with a clear plan in place. The I-95 corridor in the Northeast, on the other hand, is a place that should remain shutdown until the curve trends downward. The social distancing in NY metro worked and probably prevented a humanitarian crisis unlike anything we’ve ever seen in this country.
We live in a Covid rich state 1.2 mil metro area, 1,000 Covid cases, 150 in hospital, 76 inICU, 46 on vent. One of our 8 regional med centers could handle all cases. Our cases are thankfully starting to drop, local university is starting to do elective procedures. Keeping our fingers crossed! Praying for all first responders. PPE is scarce but not reusing.
IMHO, I expect 3/4 of states to partially reopen by May 18th. Some states in early May with others Mid to Late May. I have no idea about NYC as that was the hardest hit area in the USA.
![]()
This is where all 50 states stand on reopening
Stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders are being lifted in some states and extended in others as the coronavirus pandemic continues to upend life. Here’s the latest on where states stand in their plans to reopen.www.cnn.com
I agree with Cramer who is a Dermocrat. Open up the country ( or some of it) by May 11, 2020.
Following the trend line (which I admit is anything but certain) Cramer thinks by May 11th the numbers will be very low:
There is no such thing as a simple math question when the leaders making these decisions cannot do simple math. This has already been proven. A big reason we are where we are is that this country does not understand grade school level math. Let's not even start about basic science knowledge or data driven policy-making. Any decision these ppl make that ends up being right will be purely a result of dumb luck. Keep your fingers crossed.It’s a simple math question. Can your healthcare system handle a surge in patients? Is there a plan in place to handle such a surge?
China has actually have performed some truly cutting-edge research on algorithms to distill monitored social behavior down to a numerical score.We should also demand access to everyone’s social media accounts and if you were one of the *****s who contracted the virus from one of your idiotic rallies then you get denied care...or at least charged exorbitant fees. This is a situation where we need to ration care and rationing based on stupidity seems to be a reasonable approach.
We could call it whatever the antonym of "freedom" is.China has actually have performed some truly cutting-edge research on algorithms to distill monitored social behavior down to a numerical score.
Maybe we could come up with something similar. Not sure what we could call it, perhaps a "system of credit in the social realm" though that doesn't really have a neat ring to it. We could apply it to eligibility determinations for all sorts of government programs.
Not just freedom, but basic morality. What China is doing with their Social Credit System is straight up immoral and evil.We could call it whatever the antonym of "freedom" is.
Following the trend line (which I admit is anything but certain) Cramer thinks by May 11th the numbers will be very low:
View attachment 303091
Our official case count is 800k and our actual case count is probably in the millions. How do you contact trace that many cases? I think we could have done contact tracing in February but that is not possible now.
t.co
We could call it whatever the antonym of "freedom" is.
Or maybe when the currency collapses and there is no food in the grocery with rampant crime in the streets you may come around to the realization that this response was idiotic from the beginning. People need to work.People still don't get it. There are two kinds of places: places that have already seen a Covid tsunami and have learned their lesson, and places that haven't yet.
Places that can do whatever the heck they want because they will never see one don't exist. That's like the *****s who believed it was all a democratic hoax, just to die of Covid one month later. Social isolation will be our way of life for at least the near future. That's the main reason the whole country doesn't look like NYC today.
I am almost looking forward to all these red states reopening without restrictions, and then crashing a month later, because they won't believe their dear leader is incompetent until their loved ones get sick.
Isn’t adequate PPE part of healthcare capacity? If you use all the masks for elective cases, there won’t be enough for a surge. Same for propofol.
We have some hospitals in town that have 10 COVID cases but others that have over 50 and the COVID census can double overnight. Are patients even going to show up for elective surgeries knowing that hospitals have COVID within their doors?
Lol, I’d wager predominantly yes. People are using a hair cut as an absolute need to get back to normal you think they’re going to put off their not purely elective surgeries? The only reason we won’t be 90% speed ahead with elective ortho is because hospitals aren’t going to open up truly electives right away.
Would you go to a barber shop knowing people in their waiting room have COVID?
Not just freedom, but basic morality. What China is doing with their Social Credit System is straight up immoral and evil.
Frustrating as it can be, caring for dumb people with self-inflicted disease is what we have always done. Outside of pediatrics almost all disease and injury is the fault of the afflicted person, at least to some degree. I'm not at all interested in the US adopting a system that makes moral judgments on who deserves care and who doesn't.
Would you go to a barber shop knowing people in their waiting room have COVID?
No. We are providing a service and want to be paid for it. To be forced to provide a service without being paid is called slavery and is profoundly immoral.Is rationing care based on ability to pay just as immoral? Money and wealth has kind of been our proxy measurement for good decision-making in our society. Are we making moral judgments on people when we refuse care based on their ability to pay for it?
That exact reasoning is why some businesses here in SC haven't reopened despite being allowed to.This kind of thing is going to have effects that people aren't even thinking about. You open the salon or nail parlor or bowling alley and nobody shows up. Now your business is open, you still can't pay your employees, and your landlord is going to expect rent that you can't even dream of beginning to pay....
Or maybe when my investments collapse and there is no gas for my giant truck you may come around to the realization that this response was idiotic from the beginning. I need to work.
Not just freedom, but basic morality. What China is doing with their Social Credit System is straight up immoral and evil.
Frustrating as it can be, caring for dumb people with self-inflicted disease is what we have always done. Outside of pediatrics almost all disease and injury is the fault of the afflicted person, at least to some degree. I'm not at all interested in the US adopting a system that makes moral judgments on who deserves care and who doesn't.
Never claimed to be. I am a greedy, selfish, cold hearted bastard. The fact remains that we need to open up the economy...Fixed that for you.
No-one on this board is a Robin Hood
We already have a similar system in place for certain things, something the government can easily find in your database. Credit scores, financial histories, criminal histories, etc. All these histories reflect your behavior and your past actions. Is it that hard to imagine a social history be incorporated in it? Once its in place for 200 years, people may just think it's normal and part of daily life. What if they set laws in place so it becomes a legal history? Sure it may restrict your freedom more than the US, but everywhere has their own standards. It's not like USA is truly free. it's just more free than china.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Read up on stalinism, maoism etc. Or just "1984" (the novel is not far from what actually ended up happening behind the Iron Curtain.)i mentioned this before but i think its all on a spectrum, and where each government and each individual determines something is immoral and evil are different, especially with the changing times.
We already have a similar system in place for certain things, something the government can easily find in your database. Credit scores, financial histories, criminal histories, etc. All these histories reflect your behavior and your past actions. Is it that hard to imagine a social history be incorporated in it? Once its in place for 200 years, people may just think it's normal and part of daily life. What if they set laws in place so it becomes a legal history? Sure it may restrict your freedom more than the US, but everywhere has their own standards. It's not like USA is truly free. it's just more free than china.
If we shut down a month ago when we had a couple hundred deaths, why are we so eager to open up now that we have 45000 deaths? The COVID crisis is worse now, not better. It will get a lot worse when we open up.
If we shut down a month ago when we had a couple hundred deaths, why are we so eager to open up now that we have 45000 deaths? The COVID crisis is worse now, not better. It will get a lot worse when we open up.
Using that logic, we would never open again. Deaths will never go down. And yes, if you aren't closed down and have less distancing....things will get worse.
Have I been trolled? Are you just being sarcastic and I'm being like Drax?
We shut down our economy to flatten the curve (so that there were enough beds, PPE, vents to treat the currently affected patients). It wasn't ever going to effectively eliminate deaths, just spread them out over time to make more manageable for the system.
Using that logic, we would never open again. Deaths will never go down. And yes, if you aren't closed down and have less distancing....things will get worse.
Have I been trolled? Are you just being sarcastic and I'm being like Drax?
Not trolling. All the guidelines say we need to see 14 days of downward trending new cases and daily deaths before reopening. It’s happened in other countries (Italy, China) but we haven’t seen that yet.
USA
View attachment 303190View attachment 303191
ItalyView attachment 303193View attachment 303198
While I agree that the peak is not yet reached in most places, I think the numbers can’t be taken at face value and need to be adjusted due to the change in the number of tests being administered. Our testing capability was so pathetic at the beginning of this we very well may have missed thousands of cases, as the recent reports of cases in California in January would suggest. In mid March our hospital could barely do 10 tests per day, versus like 100 a day now. So while cases may very well be increasing, the fact that testing is also increasing needs to be accounted for in estimating total infections per day over time. How you would model that mathematically is beyond me.
No. We are providing a service and want to be paid for it. To be forced to provide a service without being paid is called slavery and is profoundly immoral.
My point was we are not “rationing based on ability to pay”. we are a business that provides a service and we want paying costumers. Would that every patient had the ability to pay. No more immoral than the plumber who won’t fix your sink or the grocer that won’t give you food if you don’t pay. Capitalism. It is what it is.You missed my point.
We were just informed that there is a national shortage of disposable glidescope blades and will be reusing them.