- Joined
- May 26, 2013
- Messages
- 101
- Reaction score
- 12
Pretty solid write up by teres and valkyrie.
I'll expand on a couple of things for everyone. The 2013 match list does have matches in those locations - I think it's the most impressive match list so far but not for those reasons. It's really not a great gauge to judge if people matched to NYU or Columbia, for example. It's absolutely no problem for DOs to match at well known hospitals in certain specialties. Half of the faculty at those two schools for PM&R are DOs. Those students may not even be the most competitive that matched there. Looking at highly competitive AOA matches would be a better gauge. With that being said, judging match lists isn't the best practice because interests can very so much year to year. For example, if I got a 270 on the USMLE I would never do an IM residency at Johns Hopkins because I have no interest in that field and would rather do an AOA general surgery residency - a match at a no name program. The lowest AOA ortho match last year had a higher board score than the highest score that matched psych.
There are definitely tests essentially every Monday after the first few weeks pass. A couple times a semester you'll have 2 on a Monday, but usually it's one subject. In addition, about once or twice a month, you'll have an OMM or Physical Diagnosis practical on Wed/Thurs. Those are 10 minutes long. There's two sides to this testing set up. Starting with the negative, it is intense and you're always studying for an exam. I take 1 day off of medicine about every 6 weeks. However, this forces you to really stay on top of the material and make sure you are learning. It's no secret they try to keep the pressure up to mimic the constant pace of residency and rotations. There is GPA and class rank and those that put in the effort consistently will be rewarded. Even those with less work ethic are forced to keep pace and learn the material (this is also where clickers come in - I'll expand on that later). That's a good thing when you're taking out a $300k bet on yourself. The overlap between classes first year is negligible and should be this way IMO. It's pure cramming of basic sciences and linking a biochemistry lecture about a secretion isn't going to help you learn how an artery splits through the same structure in anatomy. In second year, things move more to systems - renal, cardio/pulm, etc. Tests are seriously decreased at that time - about once a month. In summary, I like the curriculum setup but the testing system is very intense, especially if you are aiming for top of the class. This may not be for everyone but clearly has some upside.
The general format is watch the iTunes lecture the night or two before and come to class the next day. There's a 50 minute session where you are presented questions and click in an answer. After you put your initial answer (ungraded), there's a 2 min discussion with whoever is sitting by you or a chance to consult your notes and textbook. Your second answer is graded and you do roughly 10 questions per class. The questions are difficult and allow the professors to teach concepts by explaining right and wrong answers. Again, this forces you to learn the material and not fall behind. You don't have to be an expert, just an initial quick pass because you have open notes, discussion and texts. It is definitely not standard PBL and more like mini-quizzes every day with the doctors elaborating on concepts and simplifying info. After a couple weeks, it becomes VERY low-stress and does not feel like quizzes at all - just a nice way to get a couple practice questions in to see what's important for a tests.
I agree with teres, I would not count on the NJ or Staten locations if you're not a Harlem student. Also, you can take multiple thousands of dollars off the estimated COA. I have an average rent way above other people in my class and took out $7k less than suggested and live more than comfortably.
The rotation resources and this are very helpful! Thanks!
I am curious, though -- how often do people fall behind the curriculum, rendering the quiz time basically useless?
I am just imagining sitting through a quiz when I am not caught up, then having a (possibly confused) student try to explain something to me in two minutes, lose points, then have to be reminded how behind I am for the next 50 minutes, rinse and repeat for that day.