

If we're the only two applying, I like the odds
Ya never know.
Hopefully they print their rejection letters on nice paper.
so i could get at least something out of my applicationHopefully they print their rejection letters on nice paper.

Hopefully they print their rejection letters on nice paper.
or maybe on a cupcake...so i could get at least something out of my application


With the amount of rejections they dish out, I doubt they can afford that many sheets of nice paper (or cupcakes).![]()
Also throwing my hat in. My MCAT is just borderline for them (35), GPA is a mixed bag with Harvard worthy stuff happening within the last two years and terrible, terrible stuff before that. As a nontrad, I've got all that maturity stuff they talk about (I think).
You think they look at nontrads as a separate applicant pool and compare us against one another?
Anybody get the secondary yet?
I applied MSTP to Harvard. I have an ice cube's chance on Venus of getting accepted, given my GPA, and while my MCAT may compensate for that to some extent, they could probably fill their whole class with people with 39+ MCAT and 3.9+ GPA. Sobering.
Still, you'll never know if you don't try, and at $30 + secondary fee, the odds are considerably better than playing the lottery. (Although the lottery never made anyone write an essay.)
I decided to apply after reading the MSAR on their selection criteria and it referenced integrity, matruity, life experience, and leadership potential. They worst they can say is no. And like Gnomes said, it is only $33 plus the secondary fee as a max cash outlay. I live within driving distance if I were to get an interview.
Remember: Harvard could easily be WashU (statwhores, also, not dissing washu, it's a great school) if they wanted to. But they're not.
Awesome - I love to hear current students' thoughts.
How is the atmosphere at Harvard? Do the professors and the students seem to have a good rapport? With so many faculty (and distinguished!) do you actually get taught by them, or by their assistants?
Thanks for offering to answer questions!
How much do you think your 39 helped you?

I think it legitimized my education. My school was formerly Tier 3 (although moved up to Tier 1 during app season) on USNWR. I didn't get the feeling that it would be the sole reason I was accepted by any means. I'm sure there are plenty of people with higher mcat/gpa combos for hms if they wanted to do the stats thing.
It was T3 or T2 when I applied, but now it's edged up to T1. I do wonder if that makes a difference.
Sorry for being a noob, but how do you find out your school's tier? I see the US News Rankings, but I don't see it say anything about the tier.
How much do you think your 39 helped you?
This - my school did the same. It was T3 or T2 when I applied, but now it's edged up to T1. I do wonder if that makes a difference.
As an incoming MS1 - how were your interviews? Casual, or formal? Did they make an effort to put you at ease? Any off-the-wall questions?
Sorry for being a noob, but how do you find out your school's tier? I see the US News Rankings, but I don't see it say anything about the tier.
yepGo to USNews and search for your UG. Check the number - I believe under # 200 means Tier 1.
Has anyone received the secondary? Thanks.
flowrate what's the deal with a PI writing a LOR?
I do clinical research and have some pubs in process, would this be acceptable or are they looking for a basic science mentors to write LOR? sorry if this seems like a dumb question
do you forreal need one from every PI you've ever worked with?
I did basic sci research in engineering and used that PI, but I see no reason why a clinical research PI would not be acceptable. HMS, like pretty much every other (research) med school, supports clinical research as much as it does basic, as far as I can tell.
When you're applying, the LOR requirements are a little scary, or at least they were for me and some of my friends. They sound very strict and specific. After going through the process, I find that only douchebag schools are super super picky about the LOR's, and I personally did not have any (confirmed?) bad experiences with LOR's. Use your clinical research PI and you will be fine--bonus points if you've worked with them for a while (likely) or if they've taught you a class.
I already had my 2 previous PI's write letters of rec for me and sent them off but I am doing a summer internship now with a new PI. Should I ask him for a letter at the end of it and send it as an update? Would 3 PI letters be excessive? Thanks! 🙂I think I vaguely remember that stipulation on HMS' website. If it says so, just do it. Hopefully you have a good relation with all your PI's, or at least the ones you mentioned on AMCAS. I only had one so I don't remember worrying about that.
I already had my 2 previous PI's write letters of rec for me and sent them off but I am doing a summer internship now with a new PI. Should I ask him for a letter at the end of it and send it as an update? Would 3 PI letters be excessive? Thanks! 🙂
I already had my 2 previous PI's write letters of rec for me and sent them off but I am doing a summer internship now with a new PI. Should I ask him for a letter at the end of it and send it as an update? Would 3 PI letters be excessive? Thanks! 🙂
in the same boat as you 👍
Perfect! Thanks for the advice. One more question - When did you get an interview invite?If you already submitted your AMCAS, include them as updates either in mid-late September, if they're only summer jobs or if you don't have an interview invite by then, or in December/January if they're all-year jobs and you already have an invite. (february is getting close to the magic 3/15)
I don't remember exactly. I think I interviewed there in Oct or Nov, probably got my invite in Sept or Oct.Perfect! Thanks for the advice. One more question - When did you get an interview invite?
That makes a lot of sense. I meant to post a statement getting at that: if you have tons of research experiences, it might not be prudent to list them all on AMCAS; I was going to say include ones that you included on AMCAS, if they were that significant. Either way, I agree with what you said 🙂My premed advisor recommended, despite what the HMS website says, to only include PI letters from research experiences that are recent and significant to you.
Her source: meetings with admissions people at HMS.
has anyone heard anything yet? i haven't even gotten a confirmation that they've received my application
I don't remember exactly. I think I interviewed there in Oct or Nov, probably got my invite in Sept or Oct.
That makes a lot of sense. I meant to post a statement getting at that: if you have tons of research experiences, it might not be prudent to list them all on AMCAS; I was going to say include ones that you included on AMCAS, if they were that significant. Either way, I agree with what you said 🙂
This is a really common question. Did you do anything of value there? If they don't remember you, then did you contribute anything? Why list it on your AMCAS if it's not memorable?Regarding the research letter: I was wondering if most of my interactions were with one of the research technicians of the lab, do any of you know if it would be OK with Harvard adcom to get the technician to write the letter and then have the PI cosign it? The reason why I am asking is that I worked in their lab more than 3 years ago so I'm not sure how well the PI (or even the research technician) remembers me.
This is a really common question. Did you do anything of value there? If they don't remember you, then did you contribute anything? Why list it on your AMCAS if it's not memorable?
Anyway, PI preferred, lab tech discouraged. This is not limited to Harvard.
Does Harvard screen pre-secondary?
Does Harvard screen pre-secondary?