2014-2015 Waitlist Support Group

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
@gcmom415, it is VERY hard. Wishing all the waiting folks get the news they're hoping for SOON. I got a call from WashU this evening. . . unexpected. Sometimes there is a bolt from the blue. I'm a stranger to all of you, but that does not stop me from sending positive energy your way.

Hey congrats to you! Good on ya!
 
Hi @gyngyn,
What do you mean by pre-matriculation program? I'm waitlisted at one institution and want to remain in the running. However, I've begun the background check/health documentation for the school where I am accepted and made plans to attend orientation...
Pre-matriculation programs include instruction.
If your orientation has not started and you have not attended classes you are free to remain on any wait list
 
@BengaliBrat You are like the most supportive person on this support group thread (aside from @gyngyn ) so thanks for that. This has certainly been a struggle. I was planning on submitting AMCAS again today, but then decided to work on my personal statement some more. Motivation is low. Keep steady everyone. :xf:
 
@gyngyn

Are you only able to see movement from students that are wait-listed or already accepted at your program?

Or can you see all movement in general from any school, even if those students have nothing to do with your program?

Lastly, is there any way you can know if schools have filled all their seats or are currently holding open positions?
 
@gyngyn

Are you only able to see movement from students that are wait-listed or already accepted at your program?

Or can you see all movement in general from any school, even if those students have nothing to do with your program?

Lastly, is there any way you can know if schools have filled all their seats or are currently holding open positions?
Admissions officers can see acceptances from both their wait list and the list of their accepted students.
No one can see all acceptances until after the cycle is complete.
If waitlist movement has not started by now, one can reasonably be sure that the class is still filled. This does not preclude the possibility that continued poaching may bring the number down to a point at which waitlist drawing must occur.
 
Admissions officers can see acceptances from both their wait list and the list of their accepted students.
No one can see all acceptances until after the cycle is complete.
If waitlist movement has not started by now, one can reasonably be sure that the class is still filled. This does not preclude the possibility that continued poaching may bring the number down to a point at which waitlist drawing must occur.

So, for example, if a student is accepted off of a wait-list at X university and withdraws their acceptance at Y university, you wouldn't know about it because you're at Z university (given there's no overlap between X, Y, Z), correct?
 
So, for example, if a student is accepted off of a wait-list at X university and withdraws their acceptance at Y university, you wouldn't know about it because you're at Z university (given there's no overlap between X, Y, Z), correct?
If X is also on my waitlist, I would know.
If we never interviewed X, I would not know until everybody else finds out from the Clearinghouse data.
 
If X is also on my waitlist, I would know.
If we never interviewed X, I would not know until everybody else finds out from the Clearinghouse data.

Got it.

So as long as one was interviewed at a school, that school will know that one person's movements throughout the post 4/30 cycle? Even if the school rejected the individual?
 
@BengaliBrat You are like the most supportive person on this support group thread (aside from @gyngyn ) so thanks for that. This has certainly been a struggle. I was planning on submitting AMCAS again today, but then decided to work on my personal statement some more. Motivation is low. Keep steady everyone. :xf:

+1
 
Last edited:
Got it.

So as long as one was interviewed at a school, that school will know that one person's movements throughout the post 4/30 cycle? Even if the school rejected the individual?
If the school outright rejects someone, they no longer appear on daily reports.
 
Has there been any movement at RFUMS at all this cycle? I haven't seen much at all on the forum... What is the likelihood there will be any movement there before the school year starts?
 
Has there been any movement at RFUMS at all this cycle? I haven't seen much at all on the forum... What is the likelihood there will be any movement there before the school year starts?
Given how late they interview and the new nature of their interviewing process it might take some time. That is the only reason I can think of for the slow waitlist movement or the class is full this year early and movement is stifled, which seems to be prevalent in a lot of schools oddly.
 
All I've got today is Einstein and a lot of it!
Thanks for the update gyngyn! Very much appreciated. Are you able to disclose how much "a lot" is? I'm still hoping for an acceptance!
 
Each school submits an orientation start date to AMCAS. After traffic day the potential poaching school must refer to this list to make sure that orientation has not started for this student and notify the poachee school of the intended purloinment. This is would be when when the poachee informs the poacher that the object of theft has started a pre-matriculation class (or other similar program).
Does this count for DO school? I am accepted to a DO school that starts at end of July, but previous threads for my MD school where I am waitlisted show that they were not released off of the waitlist until Early August. If I start at the DO school then get accepted to my MD school, where does that leave me?
 
Does this count for DO school? I am accepted to a DO school that starts at end of July, but previous threads for my MD school where I am waitlisted show that they were not released off of the waitlist until Early August. If I start at the DO school then get accepted to my MD school, where does that leave me?
Traffic rules do not apply to DO schools.
 
lololol yes, yes I am.

It was USF Morsani, and I'm quite excited about it. Very close to family and Tampa is awesome.



you just never can tell with him, can you?


-------------
I think I want to go to the poacher school, how do I go about politely asking if they might match the FA from my other offer?
SELECT or CORE?
 
@gyngyn I am waitlisted at USF Morsani SELECT. I really want to get into this program and I was wondering if you know about any waitlist movement there. Also, should I be concerned that I have not received a call at this point? Thanks for your advice.
 
@gyngyn I am waitlisted at USF Morsani SELECT. I really want to get into this program and I was wondering if you know about any waitlist movement there. Also, should I be concerned that I have not received a call at this point? Thanks for your advice.

Have you tried contacting the program and how much do they provide you about your position? Sparingly communicating with the right person can help, if it's not done excessively. If excessive you're just asking for trouble.
 
@gyngyn I am waitlisted at USF Morsani SELECT. I really want to get into this program and I was wondering if you know about any waitlist movement there. Also, should I be concerned that I have not received a call at this point? Thanks for your advice.
I am much more familiar with CA schools and those that take a significant number of CA applicants.
Waitlist movement is extremely unpredictable, even for the officials at the school.
Until waitlist movement starts there is really nothing they can tell you.
 
In my opinion, I am beginning to believe that a significant number of applicants are holding "acceptances" at schools they don't want or plan to attend and are remaining on wait lists. Thus, bringing the wait list movement to a HALT. *SIGH*
Well at this point applicants are only given 1-2 weeks tops to hold more than one acceptance. And I don't think most accepted applicants would remain on waitlists at schools they would not attend over their current school. It sucks but just try to hang in there.
 
I agree with @HPY1317 . When I called my top choice admissions office, they said they still had multiple people with multiple acceptances and that this rule of only have one acceptance is not always followed.
 
I agree with @HPY1317 . When I called my top choice admissions office, they said they still had multiple people with multiple acceptances and that this rule of only have one acceptance is not always followed.
Well that is annoying, I know multiple people who were notified by schools after the April 30th date because they were shown to hold more than one acceptance and were told that they needed to make a decision by X date. I guess some schools don’t care though.
 
Well that is annoying, I know multiple people who were notified by schools after the April 30th date because they were shown to hold more than one acceptance and were told that they needed to make a decision by X date. I guess some schools don’t care though.
Yeah it is annoying. But it is good to hear some schools are actually enforcing it!!
 
In my opinion, I am beginning to believe that a significant number of applicants are holding "acceptances" at schools they don't want or plan to attend and are remaining on wait lists. Thus, bringing the wait list movement to a HALT. *SIGH*
No, that's not it. At least not in California.
Most everyone seems to be behaving since traffic day.
The few holding multiples since then have made prompt decisions (after we called!).
 
I hate to also ask this kind of question but has there been any movement at University of Miami or any of the UCs?

Thanks!
 
Perhaps I should clarify, I suspect applicants have "accepted" at a school that is NOT their first choice (just to have a spot "somewhere" lined up), however, are not taking themselves off whatever waitlists they were on (thus clogging up and grinding any possible waitlist movement to a halt). Think about it, you might have accepted at "X" school, however, you might be ranked really high on "Y" waitlist school (or schools). I think there should be a deadline on how long you can retain waitlists (please don't shoot me for saying this). I'm just frustrated, like most people on here. *sigh*
 
No, that's not it. At least not in California.
Most everyone seems to be behaving since traffic day.
The few holding multiples since then have made prompt decisions (after we called!).

have you even known someone to have their acceptances rescinded for not following the traffic rule?
 
Perhaps I should clarify, I suspect applicants have "accepted" at a school that is NOT their first choice (just to have a spot "somewhere" lined up), however, are not taking themselves off whatever waitlists they were on (thus clogging up and grinding any possible waitlist movement to a halt). Think about it, you might have accepted at "X" school, however, you might be ranked really high on "Y" waitlist school (or schools). I think there should be a deadline on how long you can retain waitlists (please don't shoot me for saying this). I'm just frustrated, like most people on here. *sigh*
As someone who is "clogging" a couple waitlists, I would agree to this only if the schools that waitlist me tell me I'm what tier/probability i am to get off the waitlist or if they tell me exactly what my position is. Which is probably too inconvenient for most med schools to tell each waitlistee
 
As someone who is "clogging" a couple waitlists, I would agree to this only if the schools that waitlist me tell me I'm what tier/probability i am to get off the waitlist or if they tell me exactly what my position is. Which is probably too inconvenient for most med schools to tell each waitlistee
I do know that if you're accepted somewhere and you call Miami (one of the schools you mentioned you're wait listed at), they will tell you whether or not you're close to getting accepted off of the wait list, in order to mitigate the exact situation you're talking about. Dean Weisman said this to my group on interview day- you should give them a call!
 
Perhaps I should clarify, I suspect applicants have "accepted" at a school that is NOT their first choice (just to have a spot "somewhere" lined up), however, are not taking themselves off whatever waitlists they were on (thus clogging up and grinding any possible waitlist movement to a halt). Think about it, you might have accepted at "X" school, however, you might be ranked really high on "Y" waitlist school (or schools). I think there should be a deadline on how long you can retain waitlists (please don't shoot me for saying this). I'm just frustrated, like most people on here. *sigh*
Luckily this behavior doesn't really interfere with waitlist movement, though.
I would even go so far as to say it is normal and acceptable.
One should only withdraw from the schools one doesn't prefer to the place one is accepted!
 
I'm not trying to fire up the masses, just expressing my opinion. In the ideal world, the applicant would remove themselves from the waitlist allowing others to be "moved up" in rank or given a better opportunity to be pulled from the waitlist which creates movement all around. Again, I'm just another "hopeful" (read: frustrated) applicant like everyone else on here. I wish us ALL good luck.
 
I'm not trying to fire up the masses, just expressing my opinion. In the ideal world, the applicant would remove themselves from the waitlist allowing others to be "moved up" in rank or given a better opportunity to be pulled from the waitlist which creates movement all around. Again, I'm just another "hopeful" (read: frustrated) applicant like everyone else on here. I wish us ALL good luck.

I'm not understanding how that would be different from the applicant declining their offer at school X after getting off the wait list at school Y. In the end, both scenarios opens up one spot, allowing wait list movement to occur. Conclusion: The applicant staying on the wait list doesn't interfere with wait list movement.
 
I do know that if you're accepted somewhere and you call Miami (one of the schools you mentioned you're wait listed at), they will tell you whether or not you're close to getting accepted off of the wait list, in order to mitigate the exact situation you're talking about. Dean Weisman said this to my group on interview day- you should give them a call!

Yes that's right, I did and really appreciated the info he gave me about my WL position. It's too bad most schools can't do the same as Dean Weisman..
 
@gyngyn How do waitlists work with regards to financial aid at the institution students are supposed to have narrowed down to? I'm confirming my loan amounts right now and it shows the first disbursement as July 21st, 2015. Orientation isn't until the last week of July, but as long as it's before then I can still go to my top choice if accepted off of the waitlist, correct?
You are correct.
 
Happy to report some movement at UCSF today!! Unbelievably happy. 4 interviews, 3 wait lists, and now 1 acceptance.

Stay motivated, stay persistent, stay hopeful. Get your next app ready if you need to, just do it! Keep fighting for it.

Hope everyone hears some good news soon. Thanks to everyone on here for the info and support, especially @gyngyn for your time.
 
Happy to report some movement at UCSF today!! Unbelievably happy. 4 interviews, 3 wait lists, and now 1 acceptance.

Stay motivated, stay persistent, stay hopeful. Get your next app ready if you need to, just do it! Keep fighting for it.

Hope everyone hears some good news soon. Thanks to everyone on here for the info and support, especially @gyngyn for your time.
Way to go. Congratulations.
 
Have you tried contacting the program and how much do they provide you about your position? Sparingly communicating with the right person can help, if it's not done excessively. If excessive you're just asking for trouble.
Yes I have and I know several of them personally. I spoke with a counselor and they said there's nothing I can do at this point because the waitlist is ranked. They also told me not to contact at this point because it would appear to be antagonizing.
 
Top