2024-2025 Oklahoma

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
It’s pretty irritating to know that they’re prioritizing OOS students that will probably never return to Oklahoma to practice over qualified IS students.
It is very irritating. We have a massive physician shortage in our rural areas. I know a family member who travels 45 minutes to see their primary care physician. I have heard from a rural physician in rural OK who is a jack of all trades in his town because he is one of the few physicians in the area. During interview day, OSU Med said the data shows physicians will return to their homestate upon graduation, which is why OSU prioritizes in-state applicants to curb the crisis in our rural towns.
 
I probably won't get a break on either side of the Red River if all these schools are truly just chasing after OOS super high MCAT score and such. Hoping that isn't the case though and we are all pleasantly surprised with good news sooner than later and definitely at some time before never '25.
 
The thing is that they're not even truly prioritizing high stats. A few of the people I know who have gotten accepted have below a 508 MCAT but I know so many people with a 513+ and 4.0 who have not heard back after the interview.
 
The thing is that they're not even truly prioritizing high stats. A few of the people I know who have gotten accepted have below a 508 MCAT but I know so many people with a 513+ and 4.0 who have not heard back after the interview.
Yikes!
 
It is very irritating. We have a massive physician shortage in our rural areas. I know a family member who travels 45 minutes to see their primary care physician. I have heard from a rural physician in rural OK who is a jack of all trades in his town because he is one of the few physicians in the area. During interview day, OSU Med said the data shows physicians will return to their homestate upon graduation, which is why OSU prioritizes in-state applicants to curb the crisis in our rural towns.
So not only are they trying to bump up their averages with OOS applicants, they want to further screw over Oklahomans by putting us further into a shortage of physicians. As a publicly-funded institution, it's concerning that they're more interested in appearances than actually providing healthcare to our communities...
 
Hopefully, they'll be transparent at some point about what appealed to them so much to seed sow A's on so many lower scoring applicants under this newly implemented system. It could save future applicants some fees and heartache. As for our cycle, some of us, OOS and IS, may end up cooked bc we reasonably relied on precedent.
 
i interviewed for the main school on oct 30 and will interview for tulsa on dec 2. given that i can't even get into tulsa if i dont get into the main school itself, and since i havent heard back yet, wouldn't they let me know their admissions decision before i interview on the 2nd?
 
i interviewed for the main school on oct 30 and will interview for tulsa on dec 2. given that i can't even get into tulsa if i dont get into the main school itself, and since i havent heard back yet, wouldn't they let me know their admissions decision before i interview on the 2nd?
I had my okc interview on 10/30 and tulsa on 11/7 so I don't think it works that way.
 
i interviewed for the main school on oct 30 and will interview for tulsa on dec 2. given that i can't even get into tulsa if i dont get into the main school itself, and since i havent heard back yet, wouldn't they let me know their admissions decision before i interview on the 2nd?
Logically, yes. Unfortunately, no one knows what is going on there this cycle. What we may know though is:

OU Med just got serious $ to expand class size (plus new speciality and research endeavors); Our academics, accomplishments and applications are not weighed as heavily as being able to butter up a grp. of interviewers; That some folks on a tour saw their AdComm scores but that the school says they didn't see them; That the sole state MD program has an amorphous cap now on OOS (unlike Texas for ex. which has like 12 state MD schools that caps OOS at 10%); That Dec. is no longer when we all finally learn our fate re A, R or WL and that instead of monthly batch notifications thus far, a few have been doled out here and there; That some low MCAT scorers (no idea if IS or OOS) got A's already for reasons we can only surmise at best; AND finally... that the school is simultaneously chasing high MCAT stats... which may not be suitably prevalent IS.

I think have noted most of what we "know?" Good luck all because this cycle's OU MD ride has sure been extra uncomfortable. The biggest winner overall might well be OSU's DO admissions when all is said and done.
 
Last edited:
Logically, yes. Unfortunately, no one knows what is going on there this cycle. What we may know though is:

OU Med just got serious $ to expand class size (plus new speciality and research endeavors); Our academics, accomplishment and applications are not as important as being able to butter up a grp. of interviewers; That some folks on a tour saw their AdComm scores but that the school says they didn't see them; That the sole state MD program has an amorphous cap now on OOS (unlike Texas for ex. which has like 12 state MD schools that caps OOS at 10%); That Dec. is no longer when we all finally learn our fate re A, R or WL and that instead of monthly batch notifications thus far, a few have been doled out here and there; That some low MCAT scorers (no idea if IS or OOS) got A's already for reasons we can only surmise at best; AND finally... that the school is simultaneously chasing high MCAT stats... which may not be suitably prevalent IS.

I think have noted most of what we "know?" Good luck all because this cycle's OU MD ride has sure been extra uncomfortable. The biggest winner overall might well be OSU's DO admissions when all is said and done.
Brother you have the most interesting choice of vocabulary. I hope to see you at the white coat ceremony if we both make it in.
 
i interviewed for the main school on oct 30 and will interview for tulsa on dec 2. given that i can't even get into tulsa if i dont get into the main school itself, and since i havent heard back yet, wouldn't they let me know their admissions decision before i interview on the 2nd?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I think they let you know after your Tulsa interview. I did my HSC interview early and the admin pushed pretty hard for me to do my Tulsa interview earlier because I think they wanted to speed up the decision-making process.
 
Did anyone else get told their sub-510 MCAT would not be a deal breaker, and that we would still be competitive for IS? I was worried I had to retake, but admissions told me there was no need to. Now I hear that they only want high MCAT scores. Very confused.
 
Did anyone else get told their sub-510 MCAT would not be a deal breaker, and that we would still be competitive for IS? I was worried I had to retake, but admissions told me there was no need to. Now I hear that they only want high MCAT scores. Very confused.
They definitely do not only want high MCAT scores. I know around a dozen people with a 512+ MCAT who have not heard back after the interview, but the few people I know who have gotten in all had below a 508. Honestly I wouldn't worry about it for a while because admin won't finalize the class until March this cycle.
 
They definitely do not only want high MCAT scores. I know around a dozen people with a 512+ MCAT who have not heard back after the interview, but the few people I know who have gotten in all had below a 508. Honestly I wouldn't worry about it for a while because admin won't finalize the class until March this cycle.
So Dustye Bailey says that they're increasing the OOS applicant pool due to a lack of qualified IS students and yet they've been only accepting sub 510 students? Nothing makes sense.
 
So Dustye Bailey says that they're increasing the OOS applicant pool due to a lack of qualified IS students and yet they've been only accepting sub 510 students? Nothing makes sense.
I think they're placing more emphasis on LOR and experience as opposed to MCAT, GPA, and research publications.
 
So Dustye Bailey says that they're increasing the OOS applicant pool due to a lack of qualified IS students and yet they've been only accepting sub 510 students? Nothing makes sense.
Exactly right. I have some ideas on what might be going on backstage there to cause the incongruous stuff we're seeing, and where it all could go, but speculation isn't worth anything.
 
I think they're placing more emphasis on LOR and experience as opposed to MCAT, GPA, and research publications.
I wish this was the case but someone mentioned previously that Dustye Bailey told them that they're wanting to bump up their GPA and MCAT scores. Their dental school's acceptances come out on mid-December, I'm hoping all of us who interviewed Aug-Oct. will hear by then as well.
 
Have they been sending acceptances lately? If so, have they made a bunch of calls at once?
 
I interviewed on 9/22, 510MCAT, 3.94GPA, strong ties to Oklahoma (grew up there, went to high school in OK and OU for college before moving abroad), still haven't heard anything.
 
They added another tour day for II people... in mid-January! What's the chance of knowing our fate BEFORE that tour? Does taking that tour mean they hold off for another gander at us live and free range? No idea.

Until this cycle, we would've mostly known A, R or WL around the holidays. In this cycle, we don't even have a reasonable gauge on the metrics they want. It's like there was a corporate takeover after we applied and it kinda stinks bc had we known what was afoot, many of us could have made more informed decisions back when determining schools to apply to. It's hard enough in this process without a good ole bait & switch feel.
 
Last edited:
I interviewed on 9/22, 510MCAT, 3.94GPA, strong ties to Oklahoma (grew up there, went to high school in OK and OU for college before moving abroad), still haven't heard anything.
I am IS as well and have similar stats (3.9+ GPA and 510+ MCAT) and have also yet to hear back since my interview. I think we are all quite confused as to why even the competitive IS applicants are getting pushed aside for OOSers. Nothing against OOS, however the entire state is aware of the physician shortage and IS applicants are much more likely to stay here in OK and practice.
 
I interviewed on 9/22, 510MCAT, 3.94GPA, strong ties to Oklahoma (grew up there, went to high school in OK and OU for college before moving abroad), still haven't heard anything.
Interviewed on 8/28 with a 4.0 GPA and 507 MCAT, and I have not heard anything either. However, I emailed admin about the timeline, and they emailed back on the 24th saying that the "OU College of Medicine acceptance status communication timeline is late January." Nothing else.
 
No, just a few A's and maybe R's mentioned on here earlier on. From the school, it's just been rando-blast emails on how popular their tour days are and that new ones keep being added well into January. Very disheartening for everyone who interviewed months back.
 
No, just a few A's and maybe R's mentioned on here earlier on. From the school, it's just been rando-blast emails on how popular their tour days are and that new ones keep being added well into January. Very disheartening for everyone who interviewed months back.
It's frustrating that they boast about the number of interviews while many of us are left in the dark about the process. The constant revisions made on the slideshow seem to only benefit those who toured that day.
 
It's frustrating that they boast about the number of interviews while many of us are left in the dark about the process. The constant revisions made on the slideshow seem to only benefit those who toured that day.
This is pretty standard across all med schools. Just go back a few posts to the discussion about all the individual scores and what not...pre med kids kick down the door when the slightest amount of transparency is displayed.

Not saying its right/wrong from either party, and not trying to marginalize the IS applicants frustrations over the changes. Your gripe is valid, but I think in this case it's important to remember that this is how MOST schools operate, not just OU.
 
With it being the first week of December I’m hoping maybe this is the week they make more calls? I need to stop speculating because January is what I keep hearing now but one can hope!
 
This month sure would be nice but again I have to ask... would they be inviting post-II people to tour days in January if they planned on sending out possible A, R, and WL to this same cohort in December? No idea. What a confusing cycle it's been with OU.
 
I do not think the tour invite was intended for people who had already toured. It contained a sentence saying something like “if you already toured feel free to leave us feedback” and had a link to a google form.
 
I do not think the tour invite was intended for people who had already toured. It contained a sentence saying something like “if you already toured feel free to leave us feedback” and had a link to a google form.
I hear ya but people who interviewed and didn't get the chance to tour could sign up for the later added dates. I hope doing so doesn't delay a decision.
 
Aida recently said that 60 people got admitted, and all of them have scores of ≥ 90. She said that admin's gonna keep looking for people with scores ≥ 90 until they fill 100 seats, and that the rest of the seats will be announced in February.
So they are just sitting on already determined R's (based on the score stuff) and plan to just let people worry and twist with false hope until FEB?! That's downright wicked, esp for a state school with rolling admissions. I know applicants who have gone out of their way to get to OKC, taking time off from work, paying for hotels and stuff like that just to attend January tour days in the event they get an A. Meantime, this school already knows that many of these people have zero shot?! Sure "ain't no love in Oklahoma" COM and this is something for a lot of folks to seriously think about.
 
Last edited:
Aida recently said that 60 people got admitted, and all of them have scores of ≥ 90. She said that admin's gonna keep looking for people with scores ≥ 90 until they fill 100 seats, and that the rest of the seats will be announced in February.
We were originally told 4 weeks after our interview (it’s now been 12 weeks for me), then told it would be mid December, then January, now February? I can’t keep up hahah
 
Our luck that admissions trends change drastically this year out of all! Trying to accept the fact that there’s absolutely nothing to do about my admissions decision now. Praying we hear back something before winter break, even if that is a waitlist.
 
Yeah this cycle has been a rollercoaster. When I found out I got an II from OU I was over-the-moon, felt like the interview went well, and from then on it's been an up and down battle. Some days I'm thinking positive like, "Yeah I interviewed well I'm hopeful I'll hear good news soon." And then other days it's more to the tune of, "With the amount of people interviewing I don't think I have a shot of being accepted." Good times. Hopefully the tour in January will provide some clarity in either direction.
 
Yeah this cycle has been a rollercoaster. When I found out I got an II from OU I was over-the-moon, felt like the interview went well, and from then on it's been an up and down battle. Some days I'm thinking positive like, "Yeah I interviewed well I'm hopeful I'll hear good news soon." And then other days it's more to the tune of, "With the amount of people interviewing I don't think I have a shot of being accepted." Good times. Hopefully the tour in January will provide some clarity in either direction.
I feel you on this it was so nice feeling good after the interview knowing you were fresh in the interviewers minds with only 2 weeks to hear a decision now we really are just numbers once again lmao.
 
Aida recently said that 60 people got admitted, and all of them have scores of ≥ 90. She said that admin's gonna keep looking for people with scores ≥ 90 until they fill 100 seats, and that the rest of the seats will be announced in February.
Lol, so first they say that they want to increase the OOS applicant II in order to increase MCAT and GPA scores and now they're acting as if those things aren't nearly as important since 60 of the points come from your interview and 40 points come from academics/extracurricular. This school is backwards.
 
Lol, so first they say that they want to increase the OOS applicant II in order to increase MCAT and GPA scores and now they're acting as if those things aren't nearly as important since 60 of the points come from your interview and 40 points come from academics/extracurricular. This school is backwards.
It's backwards... forwards, up, down, sideways and inside out too. Can't believe what's happening this cycle at the state's only MD program and OK is just about carrying the anchor nationally in healthcare as it is. The appalling way this has all been run even has me concerned about the program itself going forward, and whether I even want an A here if I’m accepted elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
It's backwards... forwards, up, down, sideways and inside out too. Can't believe what's happening this cycle at the state's only MD program and OK is just about carrying the anchor nationally in healthcare as it is. The appalling way this has all been run even has me concerned about the program itself going forward, and whether I even want an A here if I’m accepted elsewhere.
I agree with you. The admissions process and what we had been told is so different. It’s going to push a lot of accepted students away.
 
Lol, so first they say that they want to increase the OOS applicant II in order to increase MCAT and GPA scores and now they're acting as if those things aren't nearly as important since 60 of the points come from your interview and 40 points come from academics/extracurricular. This school is backwards.
You’d think our actions over years (application) would speak louder than our words over 60 minutes.What if a great applicant was having a rough day or they rubbed one of the interviewers wrong? Hypothetically an applicant could drop a few extra curriculars and strictly work on interview skills and get a seat over someone who did much more for their community who might have less prep interviewing.
Edit: also I find it hard to believe that our interpersonal skills through a screen are outweighing our interpersonal experiences in our essays. It would be a bit different I suppose if the interview was in-person…I personally find in-person interviews of greater quality as I am able to make a real connection with the interviewer. Still, all the hard work, volunteering, working , shadowing, etc. thousands of hours put in just to be boiled down to 40% of our score…
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know where the idea of 60% interview and 40% application came from? I never heard anyone from admin say that before but I hear it on here all the time. I also don't know how the interview can even hold that much weight when it's online and they didn't ask any particularly difficult questions.
 
Does anyone know where the idea of 60% interview and 40% application came from? I never heard anyone from admin say that before but I hear it on here all the time. I also don't know how the interview can even hold that much weight when it's online and they didn't ask any particularly difficult questions.
An admissions faculty member came to my university to talk and she told us that the interview accounts for 60 points of our ranking
 
Top