I don't actually think AM did much to pocket that game. At some point, is someone trying to put you in their pocket, or do you just choose to live in their butt?
Do you mean the others? Because 'm not salty about it. Some of us not voting you isn't because you really manipulated us. I think for some people it's a personal problem being slow to pull the trigger.
That's not what I mean.
And my understanding was that pocketing doesn't represent a player's hesitation for voting another player overall, but usually implies some personal manipulation on the part of the pocketer.
I'm referring to people being slow to pull a trigger even on a wolfy player, because of personal reasons.
Well I still think for analysis' sake it's important to specify active vs passive pocketing. Active pocketing is more likely a wolf activity. Passive pocketing, where a villager just puts themselves unbidden into someone's pocket - is not necessary AI for the supposed pocketer. I don't call it pocketing if it's a choice to live in someone's butt.
But then later, she said this:
I have her with the barest edge of village. I haven't felt the weird AM wolf manipulation yet that I've learned is trademark for wolf AM. And she's on the edge cuz the weirdness
Which is a little incongruent with what she was saying earlier about how AM wolfed in the last game. To be clear: I'm reading AM as village at this point. This just caught my attention when Cray kind of changed her stance on it.
Then here's all the early 3p stuff.
Lawpy had a few solid posts initially, but as od late if just seems to have devolved into more fluff. A disturbing amount of fluff to content ratio for me. A lot of calling out quiet players. The focus on 3P.... none of this is outside his meta overall, but the balance is off.
So that's actually more than once you've brought up 3P. It wasn't just a tinfoil, and the context is more fishing style.
That's fine to point out, it was the way you asked LIS to comment on the theory that seemed very fishy. And like you want to 3P hunt over just finding anything that isn't village to yeet. Wolves love the former over the latter greatly. Assuming you didn't push it because you're not a wolf, it's not a very pro-village discussion to push. Wolves would love nothing more than to have village help them 3P hunt. Or it's an opening for some of our noobs to start PR talk. Or maybe you were hoping a 3P would make a misstep, I don't know. I don't have a good read on you or AM right now, so it is making hard for me to lean you village with all this.
First it was 3P or factions, then it was the vig thing. More than once you've gone in a direction I find questionable is my point. Focusing on parties wolves usually want to kill, in a way that could be fishing. That is the theme.
Neutrals don't have to die, correct? We're really sure about this?
It depends on the game. I've played with wincon-exclusive neutrals and wincon-inclusive neutrals (though the latter seems significantly more common). The only confirmed thing is that they're 3p and not a wolf. Therefore not a top concern especially since we're not in an endgame situation.
I still have her village, but it isn't bad to reconsider her regularly because of conversion.
I've also considered a 3P seer. That's the tinfoil I alluded to.
3P hunting might be good cover for a 3P, just as wolf hunting is for wolves.
But the person going after the neutral the hardest now is ... Cray.
Interesting that she called out Lawpy for mentioning 3P and now that there's a known neutral, she's quite fixated on it instead of on wolf hunting.
Mayo did the most posting and contributing when he was under fire, and now it makes sense. Let him earn his keep.
If he doesn't want to wolf hunt hard, we should just be rid of him rather than risk he wins and we all lose, because that's a real possibility.
And I don't trust the wolves to be any smarter than all these 3P loving villagers and take him out before his role can ruin the game for all.
Village should never trust wolves to look out for village, even if wolves are looking out for themselves.
I just don't get this because mayo was pressing Zenge and Cyndia. It's not like he hasn't contributed to wolf hunting. With the caveat of not knowing please's affiliation, his VCA looks better than Cray's at the moment.
This is very, very weird. How do you know an attack is what silenced Shorty? And it seems Shorty is disagreeing with this theory. How did you come to this conclusion?
Never could decide if I thought this was intentional obtuseness or if she just missed the post where I had said that.
I think samac makes really good points, it doesn't feel cherry picked to me and it feels very representative. On me and at least one other player you read village and then did a complete 180 seemingly when it suited you.
The Lawpy push feels weird to me but that could be because I'm pretty dang sure of my village read on him based on a previous game with village!Lawpy, genny's description of how wolf!Lawpy plays, and our PM.
I'm wondering if the wolves made an attempt on the 3P last night that failed. Not that he would tell us.
This makes it seem even more important to me that we deal with it and vote him. Might be the only way he dies.
What in the write up made you think the attempt was specifically on mayo?
I voted mayo and sus on him very early, his tone has changed, been saying that for ages now.
If I was a wolf I would just try to NK him, but I can't, sadly I depend on the cooperation of others to remove his threat from the game. I'm afraid if I don't campaign for his death no one will do it.
You say this about multiple people in almost every game, as far as I can tell lol