Sure I can. Look at jdh's game when I had a crew and I protected them all to the near end without having a seering ability. I lost that stupid game because in the end I voted my group member over the convert wolf and I still to this day regret it.
Meaning I have been protecting samac and chaos just as much as LIS this game.
This still leaves LIS claiming 3+ neutrals in the game while hard defending you as "not a wolf."
So in the end, you are third person player hunting instead of wolf hunting? Is that what I need to take away from this?
Role reveal whenever, it's a useless ability in the context of what you've told me and unverifiable so I don't think it's gonna get you far in sympathy.
Sure, if that's what you want to take away from it. The player who absolutely loves and defends neutrals is just randomly 3p hunting for fun.
Wait, I thought you said earlier that it was something you thought the game should have?
Well, that seems to be what you are doing if you are lynching LIS and you believe his neutral claim. Then also saying I'm on that bloc too as his possible third neutral. I don't see wolf hunting in that.
I did. It hasn't been used (and/or the mods have not been forthcoming enough) in a particularly helpful manner.
...I don't necessarily believe his neutral claim? I think I've been pretty straightforward about that between hypothesizing about a second pack, a chaos subset, etc...
Considering we've killed three wolves? And don't know if cigs allowed for double kills and whatever else mechanically could be there such as a one time double kill ability or something of the sort? This is where AM would probably be sassy about relying on mechanics instead of analyzing people and their posts/VCA and current play.
I hit d5 with zero wolf suspects by analyzing posts/VCA. I've mentioned this more than once, lol.
I will immediately put in a contingency yeet for Cray and not move it, fingers crossed lol.
Let her reveal, it makes sense.
Also I'm noting you avoided my question about chaos and MJ.
Neutral as claimed.
I didn't avoid chaos. My version of chaos is having MJ put Mayo in as seering neutral when he is in fact something else. If you mean like a chaos 3rd party, then sure, maybe, but I highly doubt it is LIS.
I don't know how you could possibly misinterpret this question as being about Chaos the player.
yup. back in the day
He would want a chaotic player to stick around, so why not make them seer as neutral. Here's what I'm getting at. You all are barking up the wrong tree with LIS. I will stand by that to the end.
I should say, two people in particular that haven't been in discussion much.
The person in finals week, the one at work, chaos (who only occasionally pops in) and Barkley? lol
I'm not sure. I don't understand why she would be working against my mislynch. My main tinfoil on her is that she's also a neutral but not sure that works with what else she's doing lately. That was an earlier thought.
Haha. Jaboo and barks. Even during finals, my ass was on here playing, so I guess I also have judgey standards.
Huh? What do you mean?
From what I've read, there's more than one faction in Bioshock. Like Fontaine is working against Ryan, and the protagonist is fighting them and the Big Daddies.
Big daddies aren’t necessarily bad or good from my understanding.
Honestly at this point, I don't know how village is going to pull this off if we are all concentrating on third parties and not getting at least one more wolf.
My understanding is that the morality/goodness of the Big Daddies depends on whether the player decides to save or kill the little sisters.
I’m still on what I think is a wolf
Is there something about jaboo that has you thinking she's a wolf other than she's pretty much checked out from the thread?
Oh **** so does that mean if we kill him big daddy will power up and turn evil instead of neutral?
this is something I have considered, haha.
