Long multi-quote coming from the last 4 pages/hours or so. Granted, I'm
extremely groggy posting with a 20 hour+ sleep deficit for the week, so forgive any brainfarts.
Do you have a bus driving license? I think that requires a special operator's class
Hope the fact that MJ flipped village makes you realize that I wasn't busing MJ. I meant what I said: I was testing to see if he would follow suit and keep his word and copy my lynch vote.
Why do you say this? Are you upset that I said I'd 100 percent lynch you? There are plenty of people who post less.
I have zero recollection of you ever saying you would 100% lynch me. I'll have to go back and try to find the post.
I just posted a long analysis in why I was voting dubz. Im not really into posting a bunch of random fluff
When I said that you don't post much, I wasn't asking for fluff, just
any posts. I don't remember you posting a long analysis on why you were voting for dubz, so I'll also have to go back and find your post.
How was I too aggressively against pickles? She's still sketchy and if I'm remembering correctly, you also thought she was sketchy at one point. This also feels slightly retaliatory since part of your reasoning if that you don't like my reasoning against you.
My partial logic is:
1. I know I'm not a wolf.
2. Your reasoning for lynching me didn't make sense to me.
3. I *loved* your reasoning for pickles back then, because I was also suspecting pickles. But in the past few days she seems normal.
4. I'm suspicious of people who vote to lynch me since I know I'm a villager and it's wolfy to want to falsely accuse me of being a wolf and lynch yet another villager. That's how the wolves win.
Anyways, don't read too much into this post, since I'm way too groggy to really articulate my reasoning (will be much better tomorrow afternoon).
Lawper/shelter - shelter was sketchier earlier and I think it would've been better if lawper had just admitted that instead of trying to play it like shelter did analysis and was helping the village. He was definitely reaching to try to make her look not sketchy so that he would look better coming in.
This make sense, but curious how often a wolf would sub out? So shelter being a wolf then giving up then giving that role to Lawper. As I said earlier, being a wolf in WW is (for me) a once in a decade (literally) opportunity, so it's not something I would so easily squander and ask for a sub.
I am going with my initial gut feeling from the beginning based off of our initial reactions (but I kept my lynch off of you but you had me slightly convinced of your argument). I feel that you have a gamestyle (so know enough of the terms and have played with some of the people here and it was pretty smart to use your gap years to your advantage. I hope you don’t flip village, but I do believe it was dangerous that you admitted you played before (yes, I know it wasn’t here on pre-vet WW, but it was still with some of the people that are currently playing here, and you played pretty smart and were able to stay around based on you being rusty and not understanding some lingos).
I don't understand what you mean by "use your gap years to your advantage." If you're implying that my "gap years" where I worked myself to death and didn't play WW is some long strategic move just for WW, you're weird. I legitimately had gap years because life got crazy, so when asked to play WW, had to say no. Same with TP.
I'm also not understanding you when you say that "so know enough of the terms" -- I didn't know ANY of the pre-vet terms. I think that fact can be substantiated being my first pre-vet WW game and not knowing the pre-vet WW terms, and it's reasonable to believe that.
Re: you think it was dangerous to admit that I've played WW before. You are confusing the hell out of me. I played on SDN when it first came out in like 2005 and 2006. We developed a culture and lynched FML on Day 1.
I guess I'm too confused to understand why you're turning on me. FWIW, I think you're village, but you're playing an illogical villager.
I'm not offended that you're voting for me, but I'm definitely confused.
OK, I'm gonna hit "Post Reply" since this multi-quote is enough and then respond to pages 40-42 posts.
