Truthfully, this still isn't going to solve the issue because the stipends tend to be very small and don't provide enough incentive for veterinarians to stay in these areas. Yes, I'm sure that Appalachia needs more veterinarians, as do a lot of other more rural parts of the US, but there's several reasons that these places remain underserved, and I hate that almost every new school that has popped up or is planning to pop up within the next few years is exploiting this issue as an excuse to exist. It's not going to help the fundamental core issue at all, and in fact may exacerbate it.
One is simply that there often isn't enough money generated within the local economies to support a veterinarian, especially a recent-ish graduate, who most likely has $150,000+ worth of student loan debt. The stipend programs only touch the surface and barely make a dent in that kind of debt. The army programs are more helpful financially, but as
@batsenecal mentioned above, there are only a handful of spots open for that every year and it's extremely difficult to qualify, especially if you suffer from physical or mental health issues, which a good chunk of the veterinary population does.
Another is the lifestyle. When I was in veterinary school, a pretty substantial number of the large animal and mixed animal students that I knew in my class ended up switching to small animal, and for several of them, it was because they didn't want the rural lifestyle and/or they knew the money wasn't there. People are all gung-ho about being the next James Herriot and being on-call essentially 24/7 for mixed animal practice until they realize what that actually entails and, understandably I feel, they change their minds. And again, the fact that there's little financial incentive to stay only makes the problem worse.
It's going to take a lot more than what is currently being done to address this issue--and I'm talking huge changes to the entire veterinary school process--in order to even begin working on a real solution. Things like halting all development of future schools, freezing or (preferably) finding some way to slash tuition, offering much larger stipends so that these veterinarians can actually afford to service their debt and live halfway comfortably, or maybe even ceasing or decreasing enrollment at some schools until things are more under control. The fact is that this profession has so much going against it right now that I think it's in serious trouble unless something happens. Extreme student loan debts for pitiful salaries, especially in the areas with the greatest need for veterinary care, mental health issues abound, clients, the absolutely grueling nature of veterinary school, oversaturation...
Which gets to why I take issue with so many of these new schools opening without at least a plan to build a full (or at least pretty close to it) service teaching hospital. Almost everyone I have talked to who has attended a school using a distributive model for clinics did not particularly enjoy it and wishes that they had the support and experience of a teaching hospital. What's sadder is that these schools tend to be among the most expensive ones to attend, which feels almost predatory to me. Why pay more for a school lacking a teaching hospital when you can attend a school with one for the same price or even lower?
Especially so with LMU because while, yes, they had a high enough NAVLE pass rate to meet accreditation standards, the rate is still poor compared to the 97%-99% of most schools. That 87.4% means that there were 11 students in their principal class that didn't pass either NAVLE during their final year. That's really not good. That's 11 students who will probably have to scrounge to find some way to start paying back their massive debts before even being able to work as a veterinarian, which as someone who was dismissed from veterinary school and thus had to face something similar, is
soul crushing. I can't even put into words how painful and humiliating an experience that is; it's awful. Most schools have maybe 1-3 people fail the NAVLE per year, so 11 is an astoundingly high number. This is a test that almost everyone passes.
The fact that LMU is among the most expensive veterinary schools in the country, is having accreditation issues which they apparently do not feel the need to be transparent about nor disclose their deficiencies publically so that applicants can make a judgement call, has an unpopular distributive clinical year model and has zero plans to build an actual teaching hospital, and also is providing an education that has proved to only be able to guarantee that 87% of students will pass the exam that they NEED to pass in order to receive their veterinary license and do the work that they poured so much money, time, and effort and tears into... I would personally be very skeptical when considering this school, to be completely honest. I would hope that potential future students (as well as current ones) would be asking about these issues and what is being done to address them.