- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 108
- Reaction score
- 0
Alright, so I'm applying the military match this year as an MS4. I liked the idea of EM, especially after urgent care and trauma calls. So I asked to rotate EM, my school wouldn't allow me to rotate the specialty until I was interviewing. So my first EM rotation was as an interview rotation. Short of it: I LOVED the specialty, it was awesome, the people were awesome, I felt like I had found my niche in medicine. I was challenged, and excited about the challenge! My interview rotation felt like a very positive experience, good rapport with residents, worked well with several attendings, made more than a couple peritoneal patients giggle in pain. Good stuff.
However, I got a peek at some of my resident evals, and it seems that of the 3 I was allowed to see (the residents I had the best rapport with had either already turned them in and they'd been sorted out, or hadn't turned them in yet). And 2 of the 3 were more or less stated, "middle of the road candidate," or, "there are better candidates." For the latter eval - that critique focused on commenting on an issue I had minimal control over (transportation on and off shift) amongst other things. Thing is - I wouldn't have had the opportunity to see this feedback had I not run into the program coordinator collecting the evals, and asked. It came as a surprise, since I make a point of asking for verbal feedback after every shift, to try and fix any issues or concerns, and to try and be more than just a "middle of the road," or underwhelming candidate. It's now too late for me to truly address the issues brought up, correct any discrepancies, or work to better myself in the view of those residents.
So here I am, academically, in the military system, I'm a middle of the road candidate. My step scores are nothing to write home about. My clinical grades have largely been heart-warmingly positive in the subjective portions, but average in the objective shelf portions (leading to a string of "P").
EM in the military match is probably the most numerically competitive internship (in terms of # applicants to #selected, 42 applicants this year to 20 in-service spots for the Navy), though it seems subjective evaluations carry the most weight in the decision. I've been told repeatedly, I answer the 3AM question very well. But I'm not standing out, and at least 1 resident has a negative personal view of me.
Suggestions to move out of the middle-of-the-road, underwhelming candidate area? Ways to approach career choices going forward? General advice and thoughts are welcome!
(and now I'm super self-conscious, because a great attending agreed to an LOR, as long as I wrote it; I sent it to him, he confirmed he'd received it, but no further action has been taken on it).
However, I got a peek at some of my resident evals, and it seems that of the 3 I was allowed to see (the residents I had the best rapport with had either already turned them in and they'd been sorted out, or hadn't turned them in yet). And 2 of the 3 were more or less stated, "middle of the road candidate," or, "there are better candidates." For the latter eval - that critique focused on commenting on an issue I had minimal control over (transportation on and off shift) amongst other things. Thing is - I wouldn't have had the opportunity to see this feedback had I not run into the program coordinator collecting the evals, and asked. It came as a surprise, since I make a point of asking for verbal feedback after every shift, to try and fix any issues or concerns, and to try and be more than just a "middle of the road," or underwhelming candidate. It's now too late for me to truly address the issues brought up, correct any discrepancies, or work to better myself in the view of those residents.
So here I am, academically, in the military system, I'm a middle of the road candidate. My step scores are nothing to write home about. My clinical grades have largely been heart-warmingly positive in the subjective portions, but average in the objective shelf portions (leading to a string of "P").
EM in the military match is probably the most numerically competitive internship (in terms of # applicants to #selected, 42 applicants this year to 20 in-service spots for the Navy), though it seems subjective evaluations carry the most weight in the decision. I've been told repeatedly, I answer the 3AM question very well. But I'm not standing out, and at least 1 resident has a negative personal view of me.
Suggestions to move out of the middle-of-the-road, underwhelming candidate area? Ways to approach career choices going forward? General advice and thoughts are welcome!
(and now I'm super self-conscious, because a great attending agreed to an LOR, as long as I wrote it; I sent it to him, he confirmed he'd received it, but no further action has been taken on it).