- Joined
- Feb 19, 2018
- Messages
- 3,539
- Reaction score
- 2,666
- Points
- 2,361
- Pre-Veterinary

Don't mod from your phone.Damn Mel, bad form with the video in quote lol
I modded the entire game from my phone lolDon't mod from your phone.
Lol I said that to stagg when I was protector and he was wolf lmaoBut also the “do you trust me” really is a tell. It gives me instant Wolfy vibes and I do not approve.
😕Boom
Stop rooting for wolves!why is MsPro mad 😢
Well I didn’t say it was full proof lol.Lol I said that to stagg when I was protector and he was wolf lmao
I have had many feels throughout this game. They aren’t directed at you. Just mad at the enigma I guess lol.@dolphin106258 don't be mad 🙁
I received an upgrade after pip died that allowed me to target a fellow wolf nightly with a chance of it killing them. I think it finally worked on the... Third try?Also can I know how the upgraded kill happened??
while nursing the baby right?I modded the entire game from my phone lol
It was an upgrade to a specific wolf with a pretty low chance of success for as long as that wolf lived.Also can I know how the upgraded kill happened??
You jelly?while nursing the baby right?
like constantly for the past week?
Balls of steel you have paws. Balls.of.Steel.
am i a joke to youAnd for the most part it sounds like people still had fun.
VOTE COUNT NOWam i a joke to you
I think they let this happen because MJ accidentally outted himself hahaAlso can I know how the upgraded kill happened??
how so? weren't you allowed to kill one wolf, then FTF was just killed because of RNG? So only you and pip were actually the picks iircI do think in general this is a harder win for wolves than a normal game
modkilling wasnt a punishment that's an option here bc it's functionally extra points to your winconIf the new standard is going to be removing ability to vote as punishment in future games than I am legitimately out for awhile. Especially when it is post count based, not quality based, which was moderately annoying.
I could see removing one vote but the entire game just basically makes the person not want to play, which giving a punishment I would think you would want to do the reverse. Plus I dont really understand why Allie couldn't vote because she didnt not meet the requirement twice in a row, though I guess it was cumulative sorta thing not just back to backIf the new standard is going to be removing ability to vote as punishment in future games than I am legitimately out for awhile. Especially when it is post count based, not quality based, which was moderately annoying.
everybody is a joke to me, you're not special 😛am i a joke to you
This is an option we discussed after the fact and if this setup were to run again. We came to a conclusion along the lines of what you said, that losing voting/night action privileges for a single cycle would be appropriate v.s. for the remainder of the game.I could see removing one vote but the entire game just basically makes the person not want to play, which giving a punishment I would think you would want to do the reverse. Plus I dont really understand why Allie couldn't vote because she didnt not meet the requirement twice in a row, though I guess it was cumulative sorta thing not just back to back
Incorrect, it was originally discussed as protection from rojos, did NOT expect a wolf to legit just out themselves on thread lolI think they let this happen because MJ accidentally outted himself haha
I mean but if we mod killed someone they wouldn't be able to play either so same resultI could see removing one vote but the entire game just basically makes the person not want to play, which giving a punishment I would think you would want to do the reverse. Plus I dont really understand why Allie couldn't vote because she didnt not meet the requirement twice in a row, though I guess it was cumulative sorta thing not just back to back
(but also people shouldn't sign up for games they can't play)
oh I must have not understood what you said in spec chat then? I thought you said you added it because of him. was it a planned mechanic the whole time then?Incorrect, it was originally discussed as protection from rojos, did NOT expect a wolf to legit just out themselves on thread lol
RNG thing only happened because of the particulars of the participation punishment in this game and a villager not voting (hence my comment about village apathy/absence)how so? weren't you allowed to kill one wolf, then FTF was just killed because of RNG? So only you and pip were actually the picks iirc
edit oop forgot about SAR shows how close I was following lol
I think you misunderstood me or I wasn't clear enough, my mistakeoh I must have not understood what you said in spec chat then? I thought you said you added it because of him. was it a planned mechanic the whole time then?
What if it increases for each offense like one cycle the first time, two cycles the second, three the third, etc...?This is an option we discussed after the fact and if this setup were to run again. We came to a conclusion along the lines of what you said, that losing voting/night action privileges for a single cycle would be appropriate v.s. for the remainder of the game.
As I said in spec chat, the two were unrelated events. Rebalancing a game in the middle of it running because one player made a bad move is implicitly unfair to the other team, and not something I'd let happen.I think they let this happen because MJ accidentally outted himself haha
Is that the type of punishment you would use in a normal game?What if it increases for each offense like one cycle the first time, two cycles the second, three the third, etc...?
No, I'd probably just kill the person after the second offense instead (provided no one offers to sub).Is that the type of punishment you would use in a normal game?
that's not what you said in spec chat though, unless I am vastly misunderstanding 😳As I said in spec chat, the two were unrelated events. Rebalancing a game in the middle of it running because one player made a bad move is implicitly unfair to the other team, and not something I'd let happen.
MJ outting himself was (according to him) part of his plan to screw with the setup and test the mods.
wait so you literally just let one of the wolves kill MJ because he lost the game for them? or what? lol
yes because we would game-break that badly.
I think you're missing the sarcasm in Mel's response that you quoted from spec chat lolthat's not what you said in spec chat though, unless I am vastly misunderstanding 😳
ehh it's ok tho I didnt read a lot of this game so I'm prob just confused 😕
That was what I was getting at with the silencing. They would no longer be able to participate/strategize in a normal game, so I think something more in line with that would work better here if you wanted to stay in line with your general participation philosophy.No, I'd probably just kill the person after the second offense instead (provided no one offers to sub).
Yeah, the silencing seems good. Just was feeling stuff out for the first time and I appreciate feedback on how to improve this for any future runs.That was what I was getting at with the silencing. They would no longer be able to participate/strategize in a normal game, so I think something more in line with that would work better here if you wanted to stay in line with your general participation philosophy.