- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,922
- Reaction score
- 3,620
Oh I agree. But if he's totally wrong, that tells us something different.I don't think it gives us anything on DocE. He can be a wolf and want chaos gone too.
Oh I agree. But if he's totally wrong, that tells us something different.I don't think it gives us anything on DocE. He can be a wolf and want chaos gone too.
The reason was literally right before.
BBC misunderstanding T4 was one thing, but you jumping on it like it was somehow a wolf tell right after people explained what it meant was absurd. I've seen plenty of wolves eager to go with weird, bad logic just to put a name on the board.
People didn't start explaining until after I voted for T4C. And it wasn't to put a name on the board. At this point in the game I only lynch someone if they've done sketchy things and to put on pressure.
TRH said Ceke told her the same thing, so probably not, actually.Oh I agree. But if he's totally wrong, that tells us something different.
That is patently untrue. You quoted CDC's explanation in the same post where you voted.
Someone voting for someone else for a stupid reason is one of my number one triggers to throw a vote down.
Yes. The doubts are stupid.I quoted cdo because I was explaining why it T4C's wording didn't make sense to me. Is cdo's explanation official and overrides any doubts I may have?
Yes. The doubts are stupid.![]()
Yes. The doubts are stupid.![]()
Yeah, that's not what this is about. Your arguments for voting for people need to make sense. I mean, I guess they don't *need* to, but don't act shocked if super super flimsy reasoning gets me to vote for you.Well, I suppose I should go back to my old ways of trusting everyone and giving secrets to the wolves since doubting is dumb.
Yeah, that's not what this is about. Your arguments for voting for people need to make sense. I mean, I guess they don't *need* to, but don't act shocked if super super flimsy reasoning gets me to vote for you.
BBC didn't know that there were only two people in the group when she first posted. You were the one who came in and grabbed on, even though, let's be honest, it doesn't make any sense to assume "called the group I'm in with soy that we chat within a 'group chat'" somehow translates to wolf. It makes you look eager. I just think it's an absurdly silly leap of reasoning to make. You're entitled to vote however you want, but I'm entitled to take note when your vote makes it look like you're grasping at straws.It made sense to me and the three other people who were voting that way at the time. Just because my views don't aligned with yours doesn't mean their dumb.
BBC didn't know that there were only two people in the group when she first posted. You were the one who came in and grabbed on, even though, let's be honest, it doesn't make any sense to assume "called the group I'm in with soy that we chat within a 'group chat'" somehow translates to wolf. I just think it's an absurdly silly leap of reasoning to make. You're entitled to vote however you want, but I'm entitled to take note when your vote makes it look like you're grasping at straws.
2) I am not a "lynch the chaos" player. I have been chaos so many times and rarely have I been anti-village, more just pro-fun. I would be a hypocrite to lynch ceke without more info on her role abilities and alliance. Hell last game I accidentally help point out 2 wolves being chaotic. he he he.
Voting to lynch chaos is always a good wolf move to deflect attention from themselves. And FWIW, I have only played in a few games where chaos wins over village, and I don't really like those designs (but that is another point).
I'm going to be out of pocket for most of tomorrow, but I may catch up in the afternoon schedule and sneak away time permitting. I guess you could say real life is breaking (my) eggs in the worst way. Just in case, I will recite the people who have excited my feelers in ways many of you can only imagine:
1) Ceke - I've seen this person be very analytical. Now, it's hither and dither, wishy and washy with no sense of direction or astuteness.
Hm I definitely don't mind the ceke vote, I'm of the camp "If it's not village it needs to die". However, I'm not voting T4C because of the odd statement, I'm voting because s/he has literally contributed nothing to the game and I feel that's more prevalent that a potentially chaos player. Also, Doc E drop of that info is sketchy to me. It's very wolfy IMO to chaos hunt, and is completely pulling away from the T4C vote if s/he a wolf. So, I'll be leaving my vote where it it, but I will not upset if ceke goes.
I hesitate to defend DocE since he's usually trouble but I wouldn't say he was "chaos hunting". Ceke dropped the information openly and completely without prompting through PM.
Also, was anyone in the lead prior to Doc dropping that info? Potentially trying to pull attention away from someone.
This would get you mod killed in a game I mod and in most others. You don't cheat. End of story,I am a villager, I am also able to receive messages from the dead.
I told my PM partners that I was chaos, but villager chaos working for the good of the village, which to me meant causing chaos for the wolves (part of this was a misunderstanding initially of my role, part of it was also to see who would spill the beans on me because that would give a good indication of wolf). IF I was the affiliation I claimed, which I am not, I would have tried to get myself converted then passed on the name of one wolf to my PM partners. They in turn were supposed to pretend that I'd just dropped too much information by accident, which I thought seemed plausible considering how all over the place I've been lately. I knew that by doing this I would be lynched as well, so basically it was supposed to be kamikaze mission whereby I took out myself and another wolf at the same time.
I am a villager, I am also able to receive messages from the dead.
I told my PM partners that I was chaos, but villager chaos working for the good of the village, which to me meant causing chaos for the wolves (part of this was a misunderstanding initially of my role, part of it was also to see who would spill the beans on me because that would give a good indication of wolf). IF I was the affiliation I claimed, which I am not, I would have tried to get myself converted then passed on the name of one wolf to my PM partners. They in turn were supposed to pretend that I'd just dropped too much information by accident, which I thought seemed plausible considering how all over the place I've been lately. I knew that by doing this I would be lynched as well, so basically it was supposed to be kamikaze mission whereby I took out myself and another wolf at the same time.
The reason I told my PM partners this was because I figured if I was wolf killed, one of them should be suspected; if my 'affiliation' (villager, not chaos, but they didn't know that when I first told them the plan to kill a wolf) was revealed then it would also mean the person who revealed the information should be looked at with suspicion, because why would a villager try to stop a plan to kill a wolf?
So in summary, think of the Chaos affiliation as a misdirection in order to clear or confirm wolves. I am a villager, and receiver of messages from the dead (which I'm also still trying to work out how I can best use to the villages advantage.
Once you are converted, that is now your team, and that is who you want to win. You don't try to get converted so you can take a wolf down for the villagers, that's not how that works. Also, I'm not sure why you thought you were going to be converted in the first place.I am a villager, I am also able to receive messages from the dead.
I told my PM partners that I was chaos, but villager chaos working for the good of the village, which to me meant causing chaos for the wolves (part of this was a misunderstanding initially of my role, part of it was also to see who would spill the beans on me because that would give a good indication of wolf). IF I was the affiliation I claimed, which I am not, I would have tried to get myself converted then passed on the name of one wolf to my PM partners. They in turn were supposed to pretend that I'd just dropped too much information by accident, which I thought seemed plausible considering how all over the place I've been lately. I knew that by doing this I would be lynched as well, so basically it was supposed to be kamikaze mission whereby I took out myself and another wolf at the same time.
The reason I told my PM partners this was because I figured if I was wolf killed, one of them should be suspected; if my 'affiliation' (villager, not chaos, but they didn't know that when I first told them the plan to kill a wolf) was revealed then it would also mean the person who revealed the information should be looked at with suspicion, because why would a villager try to stop a plan to kill a wolf?
So in summary, think of the Chaos affiliation as a misdirection in order to clear or confirm wolves. I am a villager, and receiver of messages from the dead (which I'm also still trying to work out how I can best use to the villages advantage.
I am a villager, I am also able to receive messages from the dead.
I told my PM partners that I was chaos, but villager chaos working for the good of the village, which to me meant causing chaos for the wolves (part of this was a misunderstanding initially of my role, part of it was also to see who would spill the beans on me because that would give a good indication of wolf). IF I was the affiliation I claimed, which I am not, I would have tried to get myself converted then passed on the name of one wolf to my PM partners. They in turn were supposed to pretend that I'd just dropped too much information by accident, which I thought seemed plausible considering how all over the place I've been lately. I knew that by doing this I would be lynched as well, so basically it was supposed to be kamikaze mission whereby I took out myself and another wolf at the same time.
The reason I told my PM partners this was because I figured if I was wolf killed, one of them should be suspected; if my 'affiliation' (villager, not chaos, but they didn't know that when I first told them the plan to kill a wolf) was revealed then it would also mean the person who revealed the information should be looked at with suspicion, because why would a villager try to stop a plan to kill a wolf?
So in summary, think of the Chaos affiliation as a misdirection in order to clear or confirm wolves. I am a villager, and receiver of messages from the dead (which I'm also still trying to work out how I can best use to the villages advantage.
I don't understand this vote. DocE is the PM partner who called you out, but you vote TRH instead? Is there something she has said behind the scenes that makes you lean more toward her? Because that's how I voted yesterday and I'm ok going there again.Lynch TRH
I don't understand this vote. DocE is the PM partner who called you out, but you vote TRH instead? Is there something she has said behind the scenes that makes you lean more toward her? Because that's how I voted yesterday and I'm ok going there again.
so @Ceke2002 you're claiming YOU made up the "chaos" thing? That wasn't your given role? You're claiming it was misdirection which I'm assuming has backfire now?
Ceke this is super weird, I don't know if I'm missing something obvious but why would you slip a wolf name if you were converted? Why would you think you were going to be converted? This whole thing doesn't add up.
so @Ceke2002 you're claiming YOU made up the "chaos" thing? That wasn't your given role? You're claiming it was misdirection which I'm assuming has backfire now?
so you are or are not chaos?It was initially a misunderstanding that was corrected by the mods via PM, I just chose not to correct my PM partners with the new information to see what they would do.
Like I said, initial misunderstanding of my role. I thought it was just the sort of thing a chaos convert working for the village would be able to do, to me it fit with what I thought was my role in the game so I didn't see it as cheating or messing with the game in anyway. When it was reiterated to me that I was in fact village and not chaos working for the village, I opted not to correct my PM partners on that information because I wanted to see what they would do.
and also if you're waiting to convert to slip us a name, why not give it now, and then you may escape today's lynch? Lots of stuff isn't adding up with you right now. Unfortunately i think it's your playing style and I don't think you're a baddy, but I'm just never sure with you.It was initially a misunderstanding that was corrected by the mods via PM, I just chose not to correct my PM partners with the new information to see what they would do.