- Joined
- Apr 2, 2019
- Messages
- 3,473
- Reaction score
- 2,212
I'm obviously not going to be reveried and Barks calling me a noob rustled my jimmies 😛
I'm obviously not going to be reveried and Barks calling me a noob rustled my jimmies 😛
Hey I never used that word 😛I'm obviously not going to be reveried and Barks calling me a noob rustled my jimmies 😛
This seems like a bit of a reach, but possible. I see it as a stronger possibility the person will have a higher likelihood of living longer.Idk I could also see the logic in killing whoever’s blocked assuming they may have some PR that they are unable to use to avoid the kill.
If they could have a PR, why keep them alive long enough to use it?
What do you think innate abilities are? I was considering it a possibility that was referring to royalty.Not sure about that due to the "innate abilities" not being affected.
I sure hope not.
Did you actually see this as a possibility people would agree to or did you just want to propose an idea?I mean, it would be interesting to see what happens if we all vote for ourselves and all get the rev.
Seems odd that you're ignoring the fact that the mod has said twice now that the benefit of rev would go to all of us.
This is a bit obtuse. He stated the rev would reach everyone. But an empowerment for someone evil is no benefit to the virtuous.No one. I'm making an observation. You said you were scared something bad would happen, and the mod replied to you and said that the benefit would be given to all involved. You then repeated that it spooks you. Why does it spook you?
you like the block idea but why do you like revering pips?Ok I like the block idea so
unblock coop
rever pips
Did you actually see this as a possibility people would agree to or did you just want to propose an idea?
Propose: put forward (an idea or plan) for consideration or discussion by others.I didn't propose the idea. I just agreed that it would be interesting to see what would happen. No way everyone agrees to it.
What do you think innate abilities are? I was considering it a possibility that was referring to royalty.
I have looked and relooked but I can't seem to find where MsP voted for barks. Did I just miss it?Official First Day Tally
REVERIE
Animal Midwife (1) - Animal Midwife
Coopah () -
Coffee (1) - Coffee
genny (2) - genny, zigjaz
miz () -
pippy (6) - pippy, capri, sar, mpm, miz, paws
barks (6) - cubs, barks, dina, matty, doggo, MsP
sov (1) - skim
lawpy () -
pbc () -
stagg (1) - stagg
dubz (3) - pbc, dubz, coop
mel (2) - grebes, mel
BLOCK
Animal Midwife () -
Pippy () -
coop () -
mpm (1) - mutts
jahboi (4) - jahboi, allie, kcough, lawpy
Current vote tally: 28/33
Missing votes: 5 people
Time Remaining: Approximately 50 hours
Gif of the day:
![]()
To continue the conversation we were having... However, it doesn't seem we are getting anywhere.What's the point of this question? Feels scaly.
I have looked and relooked but I can't seem to find where MsP voted for barks. Did I just miss it?
Propose: put forward (an idea or plan) for consideration or discussion by others.
I am unsure of how your comment doesn't qualify as this.
What is the purpose of bringing something up if you don't see it as a possibility?
So 1 way ties all around?![]()
I did miss that. My apologies.Did you miss this?
I was responding to that. Just because I think something might be interesting doesn't mean I think it'll happen.
I did miss that. My apologies.
Interesting observation. I previously looked up reverie and revere because I couldn't decide which word it actually was supposed to be and because both could potentially fit. Reverie does point to information.The revere vs. reverie typos are driving me batty. Reverie is a daydream. I can't help but want to jump to the conclusion that those people selected will get a little more info.
Commenting on this for the purposes of anyone doing an unofficial tally, the vote is valid.
Glad I’m not the only one HahaThe revere vs. reverie typos are driving me batty. Reverie is a daydream. I can't help but want to jump to the conclusion that those people selected will get a little more info.
Ok so now can we please discuss why MsP is voting for barks but she has not voted anywhere on thread? @Ms Procrastinator ?
What direction were you hoping the conversation would take?To continue the conversation we were having... However, it doesn't seem we are getting anywhere.
You said there is a big difference between vanilla for 5 days and being blocked for 5 days was because of the "innate" portion.
Navi said in the intro that some characters would be entering at different times. I'm assuming that is why MsP isn't on thread yet.
This says after d1. She has posted on the thread, twice. (edit: just with pictures) And she has liked posts. but she hasn't voted on thread.One thing you may notice at the beginning of the game (starting following the end of day 1) is that certain characters are not available to be voted on or appear unavailable. Unlike many games you may be used to, this game is fluid and meant to tell a story. That means that certain characters, whether good, evil, neutral, or other, may be entering the game at points where it makes the most sense for them to enter. Some of these characters may not be able to interact with you at all until they enter the game. Others may be able to. Others still may have restrictions on how they interact until they are fully within the game. If you are entering the game later, and you have not been told otherwise, you may vote on the thread and participate in the discussion for each lynch cycle leading up to your full addition to the game.
I hadn't noticed, but now that you have pointed it out it I would guess she has not "joined the game" or something.Interesting observation. I previously looked up reverie and revere because I couldn't decide which word it actually was supposed to be and because both could potentially fit. Reverie does point to information.
Ok so now can we please discuss why MsP is voting for barks but she has not voted anywhere on thread? @Ms Procrastinator ?
I had no specific aspirations for the direction of the conversation.What direction were you hoping the conversation would take?
There are plenty of explanations I like, but I'm more interested in what your ideas are.This says after d1. She has posted on the thread, twice. (edit: just with pictures) And she has liked posts. but she hasn't voted on thread.
Interesting observation. I previously looked up reverie and revere because I couldn't decide which word it actually was supposed to be and because both could potentially fit. Reverie does point to information.
Ok so now can we please discuss why MsP is voting for barks but she has not voted anywhere on thread? @Ms Procrastinator ?
Are you in control of your own vote?
Ok you lost me on this one.
I do not currently have the explanation. We can clearly see she is now unable to post words on the thread. It is interesting her vote came in for barks when barks had 5 votes and pip had 4, pushing the vote to be more towards barks. I am not sure what to make of it. Maybe I am just overanalyzing and she hasn't "entered" yet. But then I am unsure why she would be allowed to post pictures.There are plenty of explanations I like, but I'm more interested in what your ideas are.
Then why mention royalty?I had no specific aspirations for the direction of the conversation.
Painting pictures with your mind?
Are you in control of your own vote?
Ok you lost me on this one.
Paintingpictures with your mind?
I don't understand this question. The answer should be clear.Then why mention royalty?
I had no specific aspirations for the direction of the conversation.
MsP is perma-silenced, but she can use telekinesis through pictures to talk.
She can message Nav her votes.
Well that is some faulty logic if I have ever seen it. I did have an opinion. I stated it. I didn't have a specific goal for the way the conversation would go. I don't control how people respond. You've shown time and time again you only like to ask questions. Not answer them. I see no further point in engaging with you.So why are you asking question you don't seem to have any real opinion on?
No, I don't see why you would mention innate abilities being connected to royalty if you didn't want the conversation to go in that direction.I don't understand this question. The answer should be clear.
Well that is some faulty logic if I have ever seen it. I did have an opinion. I stated it. I didn't have a specific goal for the way the conversation would go. I don't control how people respond. You've shown time and time again you only like to ask questions. Not answer them. I see no further point in engaging with you.
I just watched Unicorn Store this weekend so I totally get itAre you in control of your own vote?
Ok you lost me on this one.
You seem to have lost your ability to read this game. I added to the discourse.If you're only going to ask questions with no intention to actually add to the discourse, you will be called out by me time and time again, sometimes you'll even get lynched. You are with me or against me.
You seem to have lost your ability to read this game. I added to the discourse.
Why are you vaguely threatening me?
OT: that whole movie was one f****** psychedelic tripI just watched Unicorn Store this weekend so I totally get it
but why pip? there are still two days of voting, and it isn't either orI'm obviously not going to be reveried and Barks calling me a noob rustled my jimmies 😛
Nice try.Which discourse did you add to?
Nice try.
There is no definitive concrete reason for Pip. I haven’t gotten obvious red flags in what I’ve seen her post so far and it is, at the moment, between her and Barks. Quite honestly I’m not getting bad vibes from either of them, although the way this game is worded I’m not even sure if there are any definite ‘wolf’ characters in this game. If more concrete information comes out I’m happy to switch; I do enjoy a waffle party 😉but why pip? there are still two days of voting, and it isn't either or