- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,109
- Reaction score
- 20,913
I'm going to throw a wrench in anyways, so act fast
I need a tally first.
I'm going to throw a wrench in anyways, so act fast
Care to explain? You got on my case for voting for vmh###unlynch nohika####
###lynch vmh###
Care to explain? You got on my case for voting for vmh
Lynch meats
Going to go with the possibility that I'm already tunneling on trilt a bit
You did, what is your reasoning for voting for her?Did I, though?
I think it's more likely that you're tunneling on meLynch meats
Going to go with the possibility that I'm already tunneling on trilt a bit
You did, what is your reasoning for voting for her?
Drunk posting has actually made me feel better about her than I did this morning. Had given her a lot of dings early on but didn't really want to push her on the thread because she gets a grace period for being trilt 😛I don’t think Trilt is wolfy. Maybe.
Don't guilt trip me, meats. I'm not the only one on this voteI think it's more likely that you're tunneling on me
It's typical of you and disappointing, tbh
I feel like this is basically a succinct description fo you and I in WW.I don’t think Trilt is wolfy. Maybe.
defend instead of ****posting, k?I think it's more likely that you're tunneling on me
It's typical of you and disappointing, tbh
I got on you for your reason, not your vote.
@MixedAnimals77 @Skyerien @bryndiana.jones why are you on the Lawper lynch?
Nohika is making me think village recently. Mixy I'm willing to believe is villagey. I want to vote Finn, but at this point it'd just be diffusing the lynch vote. Willing to lynch lawper to avoid tie shenanigans if people have solid reasons there.
Lawper's random "hi" followed by lynch and quick disappearance reminds me of a noob wolf play like greeney in MI. That's my reason.@MixedAnimals77 @Skyerien @bryndiana.jones why are you on the Lawper lynch?
Nohika is making me think village recently. Mixy I'm willing to believe is villagey. I want to vote Finn, but at this point it'd just be diffusing the lynch vote. Willing to lynch lawper to avoid tie shenanigans if people have solid reasons there.
ETA: whole lotta ninja'd
I have already defended about the thing I'm getting lynched for - the questioning the question answering early in the game - ad nauseum.defend instead of ****posting, k?
Okay, you have not answered my question yet though. Do you have a reason of your own?.
Limited experience. One game. You cannot meta someone on one game. I feel like you're stretching to fit Lawper into a mislynchOkay, you have not answered my question yet though. Do you have a reason of your own?
In my limited experience with Lawper, he has been very engaged and strongly opinionated in his thoughts about who is sketchy. His activity in this game has been the opposite, which makes me feel like something is off with him.
Except that wasn't a noob wolf play that legit was greeney not being able to get back to the thread.Lawper's random "hi" followed by lynch and quick disappearance reminds me of a noob wolf play like greeney in MI. That's my reason.
You think I'm sketchy because I agreed with the opinions others had formed. Big deal.I’m not gonna bother answering you when you’re busy putting words in my mouth.
Yes, exactly. I am doing the best I can with the information and experience that I have, which is not much.Limited experience. One game
Didn't know that, good to know.Limited experience. One game. You cannot meta someone on one game. I feel like you're stretching to fit Lawper into a mislynch
Except that wasn't a noob wolf play that legit was greeney not being able to get back to the thread.
Unlynch Nohika
Lynch Bryndiana
You think I'm sketchy because I agreed with the opinions others had formed. Big deal.
I think you’re sketchy because that is exactly ALL you’ve offered so far. One or two lousy posts saying you agree with something.... and nothing substantive otherwise.
Which, btw, is different than me criticizing your vote for vmh. Your insistence at misconstruing what I said is sketchy too.
All in all, you add up pretty sketchy.
I mentioned earlier that Crayola has posted a TON of "this is what I did today" stuff, and not so much of substance. So that does not sit too well with me.
True, I have been taking note of those who have been sitting back more, but it seems off to me because posting without substance (like killerleaf has also been called out for) distracts from actual lynching conversation (like how long Cray's and SkiO's little battle went for).
I don't really know any of these players (I would not count one noob game as "knowing" someone well), so I am just going off of what they have posted in the last 24ish hours. Cray seemed irritated that we wanted to hear more from her, and that we didn't just know she was busy. It was a bit over the top.
I gave a short list of those that feel "off" to me. Crayola, Lawper, and Killerleaf all sit on that list, . Having played one game with Lawper, I think I can get a better read on him than Cray, since she and I have never played a game together.
You cannot meta someone on one game
Self preserving vote or self preserving defense?Is there a reason you're not self-preserving @vetmedhead?
If you're actually village this is lame.Anyway I've been due for a D1 lynch for a while. Good luck village! 😀
😵Anyway I've been due for a D1 lynch for a while. Good luck village! 😀
*twitch*choclate chip cookies
I've posted multiple times with my thoughts on who is sketchy and why
INSUBORDINATION*twitch*
Chocolate chip is hands down my favorite cookie. Classic.Omg. Meats was so delicious. Happiness is dead.
are we playing another round of "Post restriction or bad grammar?"*twitch*
I have literally never listened to someone telling me to do thisGET THIS PLACE CLEANED UP AND GET TO WORK.
I'D ADVISE YOU TO LISTEN THIS TIMEI have literally never listened to someone telling me to do this
I'm trying to decide if the above are more "I'm answering this question because these noobs are still green and I want to help them" or "I'm answering this question because look everyone, I'm helping village"![]()